Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OCSL vs CGBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
OCSL vs CGBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.08B | $859M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $300M | $168M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $74M |
| Gross Margin | 87.2% | 59.2% |
| Operating Margin | 50.4% | 54.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $968M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $80M | $30M |
OCSL vs CGBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oaktree Specialty L… (OCSL) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Carlyle Secured Len… (CGBD) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCSL vs CGBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OCSL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 14.1%
- Rev growth 60.9%, EPS growth -45.8%
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs CGBD's 47.8%
CGBD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and stability.
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.61 vs OCSL's 0.64
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 60.9% NII/revenue growth vs CGBD's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 8.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs OCSL's 0.64 | |
| Dividends | 14.1% yield, vs CGBD's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.7% vs CGBD's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4% |
OCSL vs CGBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CGBD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCSL is the larger business by revenue, generating $300M annually — 1.8x CGBD's $168M. CGBD is the more profitable business, keeping 53.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCSL's 11.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $300M | $168M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $129M | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $74M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | -$53M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.2% | +59.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | +54.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +53.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +62.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
OCSL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, CGBD trades at a 76% valuation discount to OCSL's 31.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OCSL's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CGBD's 19.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $859M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.31x | 7.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.07x | 8.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.44x | 19.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.59x | 5.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.55x | 8.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OCSL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CGBD delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $3 for OCSL. OCSL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CGBD's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OCSL scores 7/9 vs CGBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.9% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $938M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $80M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $968M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OCSL and CGBD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CGBD five years ago would be worth $14,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,097 for OCSL. Over the past 12 months, OCSL leads with a +3.7% total return vs CGBD's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CGBD at 8.0% vs OCSL's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +26.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.0% | +48.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.5% | +47.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | +8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OCSL and CGBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CGBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCSL's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.77 | $14.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.63 | $10.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +81.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 983K | 785K |
Analyst Outlook
OCSL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OCSL as "Hold" and CGBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for CGBD (target: $15) vs -1.7% for OCSL (target: $12). For income investors, OCSL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.10% vs CGBD's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.1% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.72 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% |
OCSL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CGBD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
OCSL vs CGBD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCSL or CGBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is the stronger pick with 60.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OCSL or CGBD?
On trailing P/E, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OCSL or CGBD?
Over the past 5 years, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) delivered a total return of +48. 5%, compared to +11. 0% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OCSL returned +89. 5% versus CGBD's +47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OCSL or CGBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation's 0. 64β — meaning OCSL is approximately 5% more volatile than CGBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 101% versus 107% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OCSL or CGBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is pulling ahead at 60.
9% versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. grew EPS -3. 7% year-over-year, compared to -45. 8% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OCSL or CGBD?
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus 11. 3% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CGBD leads at 54. 7% versus 50. 4% for OCSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCSL leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OCSL or CGBD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) trades at 8.
1x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGBD: 27. 3% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OCSL or CGBD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 0. 2% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD).
09Is OCSL or CGBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 14. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCSL: +89. 5%, CGBD: +47. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OCSL and CGBD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OCSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CGBD is a small-cap deep-value stock. OCSL pays a dividend while CGBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.