Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OCUL vs ALDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
OCUL vs ALDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.12B | $104M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-290M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 87.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.7x |
| Total Debt | $80M | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $737M | $55M |
OCUL vs ALDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ocular Therapeutix,… (OCUL) | 100 | 137.5 | +37.5% |
| Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX) | 100 | 35.2 | -64.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCUL vs ALDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OCUL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.27
- Rev growth -18.7%, EPS growth -16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
- -10.6% 10Y total return vs ALDX's -72.1%
ALDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and quality.
- 3.6% revenue growth vs OCUL's -18.7%
- 4.1% margin vs OCUL's -5.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs OCUL's -18.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs OCUL's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs ALDX's 1.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs ALDX's -13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -48.4% ROA vs ALDX's -55.5% |
OCUL vs ALDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OCUL vs ALDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALDX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCUL and ALDX operate at a comparable scale, with $52M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$295M | -$45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$290M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$241M | -$40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +48.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OCUL and ALDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $104M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $65M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.82x | -1.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 40.90x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.77x | 1.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OCUL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OCUL delivers a -64.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-65 in annual profit, vs $-88 for ALDX. OCUL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALDX's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OCUL scores 4/9 vs ALDX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -64.6% | -87.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.4% | -55.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.0% | -56.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$657M | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $737M | $55M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $15M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.63x | -21.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OCUL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OCUL five years ago would be worth $5,957 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,386 for ALDX. Over the past 12 months, OCUL leads with a +37.3% total return vs ALDX's -13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCUL at 14.8% vs ALDX's -45.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.1% | -63.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.3% | -13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.2% | -83.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.4% | -86.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.6% | -72.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.8% | -45.5% |
Risk & Volatility
OCUL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCUL is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALDX's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OCUL currently trades 58.9% from its 52-week high vs ALDX's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.44 | $6.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.23 | $1.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.9% | +28.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OCUL as "Buy" and ALDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.0% upside for ALDX (target: $10) vs 163.4% for OCUL (target: $26).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $9.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OCUL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALDX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
OCUL vs ALDX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCUL or ALDX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OCUL or ALDX?
Over the past 5 years, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) delivered a total return of -40. 4%, compared to -86. 1% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (ALDX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OCUL returned -10. 6% versus ALDX's -72. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OCUL or ALDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning ALDX is approximately 14% more volatile than OCUL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 22% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OCUL or ALDX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
grew EPS -16. 4% year-over-year, compared to -46. 9% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OCUL or ALDX?
Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -513. 2% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALDX leads at 0. 0% versus -521. 0% for OCUL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCUL leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OCUL or ALDX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALDX: 459.
0% to $9. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — OCUL or ALDX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is OCUL or ALDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCUL: -10. 6%, ALDX: -72. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OCUL and ALDX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.