OFAL
OFA Group
Engineering & Construction
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-85.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OFAL vs CURV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CURV
Torrid Holdings Inc.
Apparel - Retail
Market Cap$160M
5Y Perf.-70.3%
OFAL vs CURV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OFAL | CURV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $7M | $160M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $733K | $1.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-808K | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | -105.7% | 2.1% |
| Total Debt | $512K | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32K | $20M |
OFAL vs CURV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OFAL
CURV
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFA Group (OFAL) | 100 | 14.9 | -85.1% |
| Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFAL vs CURV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CURV leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OFAL
OFA Group
The Long-Run Compounder
OFAL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -84.7% 10Y total return vs CURV's -93.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
CURV
Torrid Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
CURV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46
- Rev growth -9.4%, EPS growth -146.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, current ratio 0.78x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CURV | -9.4% revenue growth vs OFAL's -61.9% |
| Quality / Margins | CURV | -0.7% margin vs OFAL's -110.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CURV | Beta 0.46 vs OFAL's 1.00 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CURV | -70.9% vs OFAL's -84.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CURV | -1.7% ROA vs OFAL's -219.6%, ROIC 22.5% vs -8.4% |
OFAL vs CURV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
OFAL vs CURV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCURVLAGGINGOFAL
OFALOFA Group
0leads
CURVTorrid Holdings Inc.
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OFALMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CURV4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CURV2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CURV4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CURV4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CURV2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CURV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CURV is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1365.1x OFAL's $732,614. CURV is the more profitable business, keeping -0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OFAL's -110.3%. On growth, CURV holds the edge at -14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OFALOFA Group | CURVTorrid Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $732,614 | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$807,878 | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$495,326 | -$22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -105.7% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -110.3% | -0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -67.6% | -2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.7% | -14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -185.7% |
CURV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CURV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OFALOFA Group | CURVTorrid Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $160M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $290M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.14x | -21.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 34.07x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
CURV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CURV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OFAL scores 4/9 vs CURV's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | OFALOFA Group | CURVTorrid Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.4% | +22.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.0% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $479,725 | $129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31,950 | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $511,675 | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.50x | 0.84x |
CURV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CURV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OFAL five years ago would be worth $1,530 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $634 for CURV. Over the past 12 months, CURV leads with a -70.9% total return vs OFAL's -84.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURV at -26.4% vs OFAL's -46.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OFALOFA Group | CURVTorrid Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.1% | +44.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.7% | -70.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.7% | -60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.7% | -93.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.7% | -93.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.5% | -26.4% |
CURV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURV is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OFAL's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CURV currently trades 25.2% from its 52-week high vs OFAL's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OFALOFA Group | CURVTorrid Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.79 | $6.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $0.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 35.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 227K | 852K |
CURV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | OFALOFA Group | CURVTorrid Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.51 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CURV leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
Best OverallTorrid Holdings Inc. (CURV)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OFAL vs CURV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFAL or CURV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the stronger pick with -9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 9% for OFA Group (OFAL). Analysts rate Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OFAL or CURV?
Over the past 5 years, OFA Group (OFAL) delivered a total return of -84.
7%, compared to -93. 7% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OFAL returned -84. 7% versus CURV's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OFAL or CURV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus OFA Group's 1. 00β — meaning OFAL is approximately 119% more volatile than CURV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — OFAL or CURV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is pulling ahead at -9. 4% versus -61. 9% for OFA Group (OFAL). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OFAL or CURV?
Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 7% net margin versus -353. 8% for OFA Group — meaning it keeps -0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CURV leads at 2. 1% versus -340. 2% for OFAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OFAL leads at 43. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OFAL or CURV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OFAL or CURV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURV: -93. 7%, OFAL: -84. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OFAL and CURV?
These companies operate in different sectors (OFAL (Industrials) and CURV (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OFAL: -70.7% · CURV: -14.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.