OFLX
Omega Flex, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$308M
5Y Perf.-70.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OFLX vs ATO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
Regulated Gas
Market Cap$30.09B
5Y Perf.+76.9%
OFLX vs ATO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OFLX | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $308M | $30.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98M | $4.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $1.35B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 32.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 35.9% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $9.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $204M |
OFLX vs ATO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OFLX
ATO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Atmos Energy Corpor… (ATO) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFLX vs ATO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OFLX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Atmos Energy Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OFLX
Omega Flex, Inc.
The Income Pick
OFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.35, yield 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 5.20x
- Beta 1.35, yield 4.5%, current ratio 5.20x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
The Growth Play
ATO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 9.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.8%
- 179.6% 10Y total return vs OFLX's 39.0%
- 12.9% revenue growth vs OFLX's -3.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ATO | 12.9% revenue growth vs OFLX's -3.3% |
| Value | OFLX | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 21.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | ATO | 27.6% margin vs OFLX's 13.6% |
| Stability / Safety | OFLX | Lower D/E ratio (5.7% vs 68.6%) |
| Dividends | OFLX | 4.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ATO's 1.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ATO | +14.1% vs OFLX's +4.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OFLX | 12.9% ROA vs ATO's 4.5%, ROIC 35.1% vs 5.5% |
OFLX vs ATO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
OFLX vs ATO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLATOLAGGINGOFLX
OFLXOmega Flex, Inc.
2leads
ATOAtmos Energy Corporat…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OFLXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ATO4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OFLX4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OFLX8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ATO6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ATO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 49.8x OFLX's $98M. ATO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OFLX's 13.6%.
| Metric | OFLXOmega Flex, Inc. | ATOAtmos Energy Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98M | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | -$2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +32.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +35.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +27.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | -40.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | +14.5% |
ATO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.7x trailing earnings, OFLX trades at a 15% valuation discount to ATO's 24.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OFLX's 14.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATO's 17.1x.
| Metric | OFLXOmega Flex, Inc. | ATOAtmos Energy Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $308M | $30.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $259M | $39.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.73x | 24.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.60x | 21.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.16x | 17.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 6.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.66x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.04x | — |
OFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OFLX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OFLX delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for ATO. OFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATO's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OFLX scores 6/9 vs ATO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OFLXOmega Flex, Inc. | ATOAtmos Energy Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +35.1% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$48M | $9.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $204M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.61x |
OFLX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATO five years ago would be worth $19,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,377 for OFLX. Over the past 12 months, ATO leads with a +14.1% total return vs OFLX's +4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATO at 17.7% vs OFLX's -32.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OFLXOmega Flex, Inc. | ATOAtmos Energy Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.9% | +8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.8% | +14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | +62.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | +91.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +179.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.5% | +17.7% |
ATO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATO is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OFLX's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATO currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs OFLX's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OFLXOmega Flex, Inc. | ATOAtmos Energy Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | -0.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.92 | $192.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.58 | $149.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 854K |
ATO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OFLX and ATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, OFLX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.46% vs ATO's 1.90%.
| Metric | OFLXOmega Flex, Inc. | ATOAtmos Energy Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $179.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 28 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.36 | $3.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — OFLX and ATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ATO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). OFLX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallAtmos Energy Corporation (ATO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OFLX vs ATO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFLX or ATO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the stronger pick with 12.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX). Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OFLX or ATO?
On trailing P/E, Omega Flex, Inc.
(OFLX) is the cheapest at 20. 7x versus Atmos Energy Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Omega Flex, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OFLX or ATO?
Over the past 5 years, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) delivered a total return of +91.
7%, compared to -76. 2% for Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATO returned +179. 6% versus OFLX's +39. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OFLX or ATO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
00β versus Omega Flex, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning OFLX is approximately -39715% more volatile than ATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 69% for Atmos Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OFLX or ATO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is pulling ahead at 12.
9% versus -3. 3% for Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Atmos Energy Corporation grew EPS 9. 2% year-over-year, compared to -17. 4% for Omega Flex, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATO leads at 3. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OFLX or ATO?
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
5% net margin versus 15. 1% for Omega Flex, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATO leads at 33. 2% versus 17. 2% for OFLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OFLX leads at 56. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OFLX or ATO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Omega Flex, Inc.
(OFLX) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Atmos Energy Corporation — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — OFLX or ATO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 1. 9% for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO).
09Is OFLX or ATO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
00), 1. 9% yield, +179. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATO: +179. 6%, OFLX: +39. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OFLX and ATO?
These companies operate in different sectors (OFLX (Industrials) and ATO (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OFLX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ATO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OFLX: -1.0% · ATO: 0.6%)Net Margin>
%
(OFLX: 13.6% · ATO: 27.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(OFLX: 20.7x · ATO: 24.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.