Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OI vs SLGN vs SEE vs AMBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
OI vs SLGN vs SEE vs AMBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $4.25B | $6.21B | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.40B | $6.58B | $5.36B | $5.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-186M | $283M | $506M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 16.0% | 17.4% | 29.8% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 9.8% | 13.5% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 6.9x | 10.6x | 12.4x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.00B | $4.62B | $4.10B | $4.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $759M | $1.08B | $344M | $522M |
OI vs SLGN vs SEE vs AMBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) | 100 | 85.0 | -15.0% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 109.5 | +9.5% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
| Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OI vs SLGN vs SEE vs AMBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 16.0x)
SLGN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- 80.8% 10Y total return vs SEE's 4.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.22x
SEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 9.4% margin vs OI's -2.9%
- Beta 0.32 vs OI's 1.08, lower leverage
- +44.2% vs OI's -30.1%
- 7.1% ROA vs OI's -2.0%, ROIC 11.2% vs 8.4%
AMBP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 12.0% revenue growth vs OI's -1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs OI's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs OI's -2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs OI's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs AMBP's 11.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs OI's -30.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs OI's -2.0%, ROIC 11.2% vs 8.4% |
OI vs SLGN vs SEE vs AMBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OI vs SLGN vs SEE vs AMBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEE leads in 3 of 6 categories
OI leads 1 • SLGN leads 0 • AMBP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLGN and SEE operate at a comparable scale, with $6.6B and $5.4B in trailing revenue. SEE is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OI's -2.9%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $6.6B | $5.4B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $966M | $965M | $753M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$186M | $283M | $506M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $474M | $307M | $459M | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +17.4% | +29.8% | +10.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +9.8% | +13.5% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +4.3% | +9.4% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +4.7% | +8.6% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | +6.5% | +2.1% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -6.3% | +16.4% | +58.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 18% valuation discount to SLGN's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OI's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SEE's 14.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $4.3B | $6.2B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $7.8B | $10.0B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.71x | 14.91x | 12.29x | -214.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.94x | 10.60x | 12.38x | 15.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 9.66x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.01x | 7.97x | 14.33x | 8.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 0.66x | 1.16x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.89x | 5.02x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.21x | 10.07x | 13.54x | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-11 for OI. SLGN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OI's 3.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | +12.5% | +48.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +3.0% | +7.1% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +8.7% | +11.2% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +9.9% | +14.1% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.46x | 2.03x | 3.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.2B | $3.5B | $3.8B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $759M | $1.1B | $344M | $522M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $4.6B | $4.1B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 3.36x | 1.95x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SLGN and SEE and AMBP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,902 for OI. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs OI's -30.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.4% vs OI's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.6% | -1.9% | +2.0% | -2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.1% | -23.7% | +44.2% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | -11.1% | +2.4% | +34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +1.4% | -19.1% | -46.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.1% | +80.8% | +4.4% | -44.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.2% | -3.8% | +0.8% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OI's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs OI's 53.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.66x | 0.32x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.91 | $57.04 | $44.27 | $5.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $36.15 | $28.15 | $3.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.2% | +70.6% | +95.2% | +78.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 51.1 | 64.0 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 769K | 3.0M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SLGN and AMBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OI as "Hold", SLGN as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", AMBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.3% upside for OI (target: $17) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.08% vs SEE's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.40 | $50.50 | $43.50 | $4.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 21 | 27 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% | +1.9% | +11.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 | $0.81 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OI vs SLGN vs SEE vs AMBP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Silgan Holdings Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, O-I Glass, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP?
Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -51. 0% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLGN returned +80. 8% versus OI's -50. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus O-I Glass, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning OI is approximately 231% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for O-I Glass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus -1. 6% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sealed Air Corporation grew EPS 89. 5% year-over-year, compared to -21. 7% for O-I Glass, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBP leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus -2. 0% for O-I Glass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, O-I Glass, Inc.
(OI) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OI: 93. 3% to $17. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP?
In this comparison, AMBP (11.
1% yield), SLGN (2. 0% yield), SEE (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. OI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OI or SLGN or SEE or AMBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, OI: -50. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OI and SLGN and SEE and AMBP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SLGN, SEE, AMBP pay a dividend while OI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.