Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OII vs NESR vs ACDC vs OIS vs LBRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
OII vs NESR vs ACDC vs OIS vs LBRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $3.65B | $2.22B | $1.20B | $521M | $5.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.80B | $1.27B | $1.79B | $509M | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $339M | $70M | $-433M | $-106M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 13.9% | -0.3% | -9.3% | 10.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 8.8% | -12.6% | -1.2% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | 15.1x | — | 14.8x | 3638.5x |
| Total Debt | $487M | $409M | $1.14B | $88M | $873M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $689M | $108M | $23M | $70M | $28M |
OII vs NESR vs ACDC vs OIS vs LBRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oceaneering Interna… (OII) | 100 | 287.4 | +187.4% |
| National Energy Ser… (NESR) | 100 | 309.7 | +209.7% |
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| Oil States Internat… (OIS) | 100 | 111.9 | +11.9% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 203.5 | +103.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OII vs NESR vs ACDC vs OIS vs LBRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OII has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.02
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 45.3%, current ratio 1.99x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 1.99x
- 12.1% margin vs ACDC's -24.2%
NESR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 5.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
- 142.9% 10Y total return vs LBRT's 102.6%
- 13.6% revenue growth vs ACDC's -11.4%
- +271.4% vs ACDC's +67.3%
ACDC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.75 vs LBRT's 1.20
OIS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 3638.5x)
LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs ACDC's -11.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 3638.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs ACDC's -24.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs LBRT's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.4% vs ACDC's +67.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.3% ROA vs ACDC's -16.2%, ROIC 23.4% vs -4.6% |
OII vs NESR vs ACDC vs OIS vs LBRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OII vs NESR vs ACDC vs OIS vs LBRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OII leads in 2 of 6 categories
OIS leads 1 • NESR leads 1 • LBRT leads 1 • ACDC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OII leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 8.0x OIS's $509M. OII is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -24.2%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $1.3B | $1.8B | $509M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $394M | $257M | $182M | $37M | $549M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $339M | $70M | -$433M | -$106M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $240M | $46M | $2M | $68M | -$193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +13.9% | -0.3% | -9.3% | +10.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +8.8% | -12.6% | -1.2% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +5.5% | -24.2% | -20.9% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +3.6% | +0.1% | +13.3% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -12.2% | -25.1% | -100.0% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.5% | -18.2% | -3.3% | -60.5% | +16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
OIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, OII trades at a 72% valuation discount to LBRT's 37.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OIS's 12.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $2.2B | $1.2B | $521M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $2.5B | $2.3B | $539M | $6.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.48x | 28.88x | -2.90x | -4.66x | 37.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.27x | 15.15x | — | 14.85x | 3638.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.37x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.47x | 8.98x | 8.21x | 12.59x | 10.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.31x | 1.70x | 0.62x | 0.78x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.44x | 2.43x | 1.21x | 0.89x | 2.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.55x | 17.86x | 61.48x | 7.05x | 380.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OII leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OII delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-48 for ACDC. OIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NESR scores 8/9 vs ACDC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.3% | +7.3% | -48.5% | -16.8% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.3% | +3.9% | -16.2% | -11.3% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | +8.4% | -4.6% | -0.5% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | +10.9% | -6.2% | -0.6% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.45x | 1.30x | 0.15x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$201M | $301M | $1.1B | $18M | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $689M | $108M | $23M | $70M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $487M | $409M | $1.1B | $88M | $873M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.65x | 3.17x | -2.16x | -1.40x | 5.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NESR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OII five years ago would be worth $26,040 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,678 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NESR leads with a +271.4% total return vs ACDC's +67.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NESR at 93.3% vs ACDC's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.1% | +46.3% | +64.9% | +22.5% | +75.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +92.6% | +271.4% | +67.3% | +92.0% | +180.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.8% | +621.9% | -34.7% | +25.1% | +177.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.4% | +71.6% | -63.2% | +34.1% | +153.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.6% | +142.9% | -63.2% | -72.2% | +102.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.2% | +93.3% | -13.2% | +7.8% | +40.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACDC and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBRT's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LBRT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs OIS's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.20x | 0.75x | 1.16x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.12 | $26.85 | $10.70 | $14.50 | $34.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.45 | $5.47 | $3.08 | $4.22 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +86.0% | +62.2% | +59.7% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 48.0 | 46.9 | 29.2 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.1M | 1.5M | 913K | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
LBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OII as "Hold", NESR as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold", OIS as "Hold", LBRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.9% upside for OIS (target: $13) vs -9.9% for ACDC (target: $6). LBRT is the only dividend payer here at 0.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.50 | $26.80 | $6.00 | $13.33 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 6 | 6 | 32 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +0.5% |
OII leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OII vs NESR vs ACDC vs OIS vs LBRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Energy Services Reunited Corp.
(NESR) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Oceaneering International, Inc. (OII) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Energy Services Reunited Corp. (NESR) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT?
On trailing P/E, Oceaneering International, Inc.
(OII) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Liberty Energy Inc. at 37. 2x. On forward P/E, Oil States International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT?
Over the past 5 years, Oceaneering International, Inc.
(OII) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -63. 2% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NESR returned +142. 9% versus OIS's -72. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProFrac Holding Corp.
(ACDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Liberty Energy Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning LBRT is approximately 60% more volatile than ACDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oil States International, Inc. (OIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Energy Services Reunited Corp.
(NESR) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -11. 4% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Energy Services Reunited Corp. grew EPS 515. 4% year-over-year, compared to -933. 3% for Oil States International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NESR leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT?
Oceaneering International, Inc.
(OII) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 7% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OII leads at 10. 9% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OII leads at 20. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oil States International, Inc.
(OIS) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 3638. 5x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3623. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OIS: 53. 9% to $13. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT?
In this comparison, LBRT (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. OII, NESR, ACDC, OIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OII or NESR or ACDC or OIS or LBRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 1. 0% yield, +102. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBRT: +102. 6%, OIS: -72. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OII and NESR and ACDC and OIS and LBRT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OII is a small-cap deep-value stock; NESR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LBRT pays a dividend while OII, NESR, ACDC, OIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.