Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $54.10B | $54.26B | $89.22B | $70.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35.20B | $16.38B | $11.92B | $17.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.53B | $2.13B | $2.84B | $3.31B |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 22.1% | 62.8% | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 21.1% | 38.8% | 28.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 24.9x | 31.2x | 22.3x |
| Total Debt | $32.82B | $17.55B | $29.36B | $32.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $166M | $63M | $109M |
OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) | 100 | 234.0 | +134.0% |
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 1411.1 | +1311.1% |
| The Williams Compan… (WMB) | 100 | 357.1 | +257.1% |
| Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) | 100 | 199.4 | +99.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth 55.4%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- Beta 0.14, yield 4.8%, current ratio 0.71x
- 55.4% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1%
TRGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs WMB's 371.1%
- +61.6% vs OKE's +12.2%
- 8.5% ROA vs KMI's 4.5%, ROIC 13.2% vs 5.6%
WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 23.8% margin vs OKE's 10.0%
KMI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 99.8%, current ratio 0.64x
- PEG 0.23 vs OKE's 0.50
- Lower P/E (22.3x vs 31.2x), PEG 0.23 vs 0.47
- Beta 0.10 vs TRGP's 0.29, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.4% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.3x vs 31.2x), PEG 0.23 vs 0.47 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs OKE's 10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs TRGP's 0.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs TRGP's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs OKE's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs KMI's 4.5%, ROIC 13.2% vs 5.6% |
OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRGP leads 2 • WMB leads 1 • KMI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.2B annually — 3.0x WMB's $11.9B. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OKE's 10.0%. On growth, OKE holds the edge at +19.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35.2B | $16.4B | $11.9B | $17.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.6B | $5.0B | $6.8B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.5B | $2.1B | $2.8B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $1.2B | $722M | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +22.1% | +62.8% | +46.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +21.1% | +38.8% | +28.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +13.0% | +23.8% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +7.1% | +6.1% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | -15.6% | -0.6% | +13.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | -100.0% | +24.6% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
OKE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, OKE trades at a 54% valuation discount to WMB's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KMI offers better value at 0.24x vs WMB's 0.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54.1B | $54.3B | $89.2B | $70.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86.8B | $71.6B | $118.5B | $102.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.84x | 29.63x | 34.09x | 23.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.22x | 24.88x | 31.23x | 22.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | — | 0.52x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.24x | 14.44x | 17.56x | 14.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 3.17x | 7.47x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.40x | 16.97x | 5.94x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.11x | 92.90x | 88.77x | 21.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP delivers a 70.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $10 for KMI. KMI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRGP's 5.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMI scores 8/9 vs OKE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +70.8% | +19.0% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +8.5% | +4.9% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +13.2% | +7.7% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +16.7% | +8.7% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.45x | 5.49x | 1.96x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.7B | $17.4B | $29.3B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $166M | $63M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32.8B | $17.5B | $29.4B | $32.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.56x | 6.52x | 3.37x | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,768 for OKE. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs OKE's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs OKE's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | +36.4% | +20.7% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +61.6% | +27.2% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.3% | +268.0% | +166.3% | +107.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.7% | +592.2% | +224.5% | +108.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.5% | +618.0% | +371.1% | +142.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.6% | +54.4% | +38.6% | +27.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRGP and KMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KMI is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRGP's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRGP currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs OKE's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.29x | 0.17x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.30 | $261.95 | $77.41 | $34.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.02 | $144.14 | $55.82 | $25.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +96.4% | +94.2% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 54.1 | 52.8 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 1.3M | 5.8M | 12.4M |
Analyst Outlook
OKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OKE as "Hold", TRGP as "Buy", WMB as "Buy", KMI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.1% upside for KMI (target: $35) vs -5.8% for TRGP (target: $238). For income investors, OKE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.77% vs TRGP's 1.51%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.88 | $237.70 | $79.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 33 | 34 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +1.5% | +2.7% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 22 | 4 | 8 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.09 | $3.81 | $2.00 | $1.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). TRGP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ONEOK, Inc.
(OKE) is the stronger pick with 55. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI?
On trailing P/E, ONEOK, Inc.
(OKE) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, ONEOK, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kinder Morgan, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus ONEOK, Inc. 's 0. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to +97. 7% for ONEOK, Inc. (OKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +618. 0% versus KMI's +142. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kinder Morgan, Inc.
(KMI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Targa Resources Corp. 's 0. 29β — meaning TRGP is approximately 210% more volatile than KMI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 5% for Targa Resources Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ONEOK, Inc.
(OKE) is pulling ahead at 55. 4% versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Targa Resources Corp. grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for ONEOK, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OKE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI?
The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 10. 1% for ONEOK, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 20. 1% for TRGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KMI leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus ONEOK, Inc. 's 0. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMI: 11. 1% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).
09Is OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 1. 5% yield, +618. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +618. 0%, KMI: +142. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OKE and TRGP and WMB and KMI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TRGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KMI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.