Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
OKUR logo
OKUR
KYMR logo
KYMR
ARVN logo
ARVN
PRAX logo
PRAX
TNGX logo
TNGX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OKUR vs KYMR vs ARVN vs PRAX vs TNGX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+89.3%
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$489M
5Y Perf.-89.0%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-42.0%
TNGX
Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.59B
5Y Perf.+164.7%

OKUR vs KYMR vs ARVN vs PRAX vs TNGX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OKUR logoOKUR
KYMR logoKYMR
ARVN logoARVN
PRAX logoPRAX
TNGX logoTNGX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$57M$7.04B$489M$7.70B$3.59B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$51M$89M$0.00$57M
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$-315M$-221M$-327M$-107M
Gross Margin33.2%97.4%97.3%
Operating Margin-7.0%-279.3%-206.2%
Total Debt$549K$82M$9M$110K$34M
Cash & Equiv.$59M$357M$143M$357M$112M

OKUR vs KYMR vs ARVN vs PRAX vs TNGXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OKUR
KYMR
ARVN
PRAX
TNGX
StockApr 21Jun 26Return
OnKure Therapeutics… (OKUR)1002.9-97.1%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100189.3+89.3%
Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN)10011.0-89.0%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10058.0-42.0%
Tango Therapeutics,… (TNGX)100264.7+164.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OKUR vs KYMR vs ARVN vs PRAX vs TNGX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OKUR and KYMR are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. TNGX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Leader

OKUR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.

  • 84.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
  • 5.5% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Best for: growth and quality
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

KYMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.91
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91 vs PRAX's 1.55
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

ARVN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PRAX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
TNGX
Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

TNGX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 48.3%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.9%
  • 202.4% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 159.2%
  • +5.1% vs ARVN's +0.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOKUR logoOKUR84.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsOKUR logoOKUR5.5% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyKYMR logoKYMRBeta 0.91 vs PRAX's 1.55
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TNGX logoTNGX+5.1% vs ARVN's +0.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KYMR logoKYMR-22.3% ROA vs OKUR's -41.5%

OKUR vs KYMR vs ARVN vs PRAX vs TNGX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OKUROnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARVNArvinas, Inc.
FY 2025
License
100.0%$130M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
TNGXTango Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
100.0%$62M

OKUR vs KYMR vs ARVN vs PRAX vs TNGX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTNGXLAGGINGPRAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TNGX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARVN and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $89M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -188.2% (TNGX) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$51M$89M$0$57M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$61M-$352M-$245M-$357M-$115M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M-$315M-$221M-$327M-$107M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$51M-$244M-$257M-$283M-$143M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.2%+97.4%+97.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.0%-2.8%-2.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.1%-2.5%-188.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.7%-2.9%-2.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.5%-91.7%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.7%+13.4%-178.9%+2.7%+11.1%
TNGX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — OKUR and ARVN and TNGX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…
Market CapShares × price$57M$7.0B$489M$7.7B$3.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$1M$6.8B$355M$7.3B$3.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.95x-23.36x-5.92x-19.77x-35.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue179.54x1.86x57.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.01x4.61x1.13x6.83x10.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — OKUR and ARVN and TNGX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OKUR. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNGX's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-45.3%-25.0%-44.4%-43.0%-41.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.5%-22.3%-28.4%-40.2%-33.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-24.9%-22.4%-65.0%-38.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-78.4%-27.2%-16.0%-49.3%-34.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934434
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.05x0.02x0.00x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$59M-$275M-$134M-$357M-$79M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$59M$357M$143M$357M$112M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$549,000$82M$9M$110,000$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5448.00x-2119.53x
KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TNGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNGX five years ago would be worth $28,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for OKUR. Over the past 12 months, TNGX leads with a +512.7% total return vs ARVN's +0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs OKUR's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.9%+18.5%-33.9%-6.9%+246.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.4%+82.3%+0.1%+491.9%+512.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.2%+242.9%-73.7%+1757.4%+776.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.4%+70.4%-91.0%-14.2%+182.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.2%+159.2%-52.8%-36.1%+202.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-63.7%+50.8%-35.9%+164.8%+106.2%
TNGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KYMR and TNGX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TNGX currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs ARVN's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x0.91x1.14x1.55x1.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.38$103.00$14.51$366.52$32.79
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.91$36.65$6.06$37.19$4.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.1%+83.7%+52.2%+72.7%+94.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.856.824.131.963.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded210K492K794K396K3.6M
Evenly matched — KYMR and TNGX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: KYMR as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", TNGX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 30.6% for KYMR (target: $113).

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$112.60$14.75$607.15$42.70
# AnalystsCovering analysts26261613
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+18.8%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TNGX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KYMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallTango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OKUR vs KYMR vs ARVN vs PRAX vs TNGX: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OKUR or KYMR or ARVN or PRAX or TNGX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

(TNGX) is the stronger pick with 48. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — OKUR or KYMR or ARVN or PRAX or TNGX?

Over the past 5 years, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

(TNGX) delivered a total return of +182. 6%, compared to -96. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNGX returned +202. 4% versus OKUR's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — OKUR or KYMR or ARVN or PRAX or TNGX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 70% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 10% for Tango Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — OKUR or KYMR or ARVN or PRAX or TNGX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

(TNGX) is pulling ahead at 48. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arvinas, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNGX leads at 35. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — OKUR or KYMR or ARVN or PRAX or TNGX?

OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

(OKUR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OKUR leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — OKUR or KYMR or ARVN or PRAX or TNGX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is OKUR or KYMR or ARVN or PRAX or TNGX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), +159. 2% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +159. 2%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between OKUR and KYMR and ARVN and PRAX and TNGX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OKUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNGX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.