Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $57M | $13.35B | $9.03B | $11.19B | $30.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.68B | $4.03B | $8.17B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $460M | $-185M | $489M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.1% | 31.9% | 25.2% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.0% | 11.8% | 11.0% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.5x | 16.9x | 13.9x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $549K | $250M | $3.07B | $3.56B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $497M | $214M | $647M | $1.98B |
OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnKure Therapeutics… (OKUR) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 275.4 | +175.4% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 56.4 | -43.6% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 77.3 | -22.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 10.28x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 10.28x
- 84.4% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 15.8% 10Y total return vs IQV's 177.5%
- 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
- Beta 1.04 vs ICLR's 1.59
CRL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ICLR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (13.9x vs 16.9x)
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.16
- PEG 0.35 vs MEDP's 0.86
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 84.4% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs ICLR's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.7% vs ICLR's -0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs OKUR's -41.5% |
OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • OKUR leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and OKUR operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.7B | $4.0B | $8.2B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | $577M | $824M | $1.5B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $460M | -$185M | $489M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | $745M | $391M | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +29.1% | +31.9% | +25.2% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.0% | +11.8% | +11.0% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +17.2% | -4.6% | +6.0% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +27.8% | +9.7% | +16.4% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.5% | +1.2% | +3.5% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +16.6% | -160.0% | -38.9% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 54% valuation discount to ICLR's 50.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs MEDP's 0.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $13.3B | $9.0B | $11.2B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $13.1B | $11.9B | $14.1B | $45.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | 30.59x | -64.44x | 50.41x | 23.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.51x | 16.90x | 13.86x | 14.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.96x | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 23.27x | 13.04x | 10.11x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.27x | 2.25x | 1.36x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 30.06x | 2.89x | 1.26x | 4.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.57x | 17.42x | 12.98x | 15.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OKUR. OKUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs OKUR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.3% | +120.9% | -5.7% | +5.2% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.5% | +24.8% | -2.5% | +3.0% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +154.9% | +6.3% | +6.2% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.4% | +65.7% | +8.1% | +7.5% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.55x | 0.95x | 0.39x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$247M | $2.9B | $2.9B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $497M | $214M | $647M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $549,000 | $250M | $3.1B | $3.6B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5448.00x | — | 4.29x | 3.83x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for OKUR. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +53.7% total return vs ICLR's -0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 28.9% vs OKUR's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.9% | -18.2% | -7.4% | -22.5% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.4% | +53.7% | +23.5% | -0.6% | +14.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +114.4% | -8.7% | -35.9% | -14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +160.4% | -47.2% | -32.0% | -25.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +1581.7% | +122.4% | +120.9% | +177.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.7% | +28.9% | -3.0% | -13.8% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEDP and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEDP is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 81.9% from its 52-week high vs ICLR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.04x | 1.39x | 1.59x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.38 | $628.92 | $228.88 | $211.00 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $294.07 | $143.06 | $66.57 | $153.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +74.3% | +81.9% | +69.3% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 66.2 | 60.8 | 67.3 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 210K | 365K | 767K | 1.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MEDP as "Hold", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for IQV (target: $222) vs -0.6% for ICLR (target: $145).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $498.86 | $213.17 | $145.36 | $222.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 37 | 30 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.9% | +4.0% | +6.7% | +4.0% |
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 23. 1x versus ICON Public Limited Company at 50. 4x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 13. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -96. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1582% versus OKUR's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 59β — meaning ICLR is approximately 53% more volatile than MEDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medpace Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus 0. 0% for OKUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQV: 22. 5% to $222. 22.
08Which pays a better dividend — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1582% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1582%, ICLR: +120. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OKUR and MEDP and CRL and ICLR and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OKUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.