Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OKYO vs SGHT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
OKYO vs SGHT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $66M | $286M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $80M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-37M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -44.8% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $41M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $92M |
OKYO vs SGHT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKYO Pharma Limited (OKYO) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Sight Sciences, Inc. (SGHT) | 100 | 61.6 | -38.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKYO vs SGHT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKYO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.79
- -55.2% 10Y total return vs SGHT's -84.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 0.40x
SGHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth 28.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- -3.1% revenue growth vs OKYO's -11K%
- +85.0% vs OKYO's +10.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% revenue growth vs OKYO's -11K% | |
| Quality / Margins | -23.9% margin vs SGHT's -46.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SGHT's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.0% vs OKYO's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -32.2% ROA vs OKYO's -128.4% |
OKYO vs SGHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OKYO vs SGHT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OKYO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGHT and OKYO operate at a comparable scale, with $80M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $80M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +86.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -44.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -46.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -31.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.3% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
OKYO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66M | $286M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64M | $235M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.50x | -7.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SGHT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SGHT scores 5/9 vs OKYO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -59.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -128.4% | -32.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -32.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$51M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $92M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.03x | -14.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OKYO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OKYO five years ago would be worth $4,475 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,579 for SGHT. Over the past 12 months, SGHT leads with a +85.0% total return vs OKYO's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OKYO at -8.7% vs SGHT's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.4% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +85.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | -49.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | -84.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | -84.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.7% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OKYO and SGHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OKYO is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGHT's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SGHT currently trades 57.3% from its 52-week high vs OKYO's 48.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 2.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.35 | $9.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $2.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.4% | +57.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 93K | 357K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OKYO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SGHT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
OKYO vs SGHT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKYO or SGHT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sight Sciences, Inc.
(SGHT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OKYO or SGHT?
Over the past 5 years, OKYO Pharma Limited (OKYO) delivered a total return of -55.
2%, compared to -84. 2% for Sight Sciences, Inc. (SGHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OKYO returned -55. 2% versus SGHT's -84. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OKYO or SGHT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OKYO Pharma Limited (OKYO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Sight Sciences, Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning SGHT is approximately 214% more volatile than OKYO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — OKYO or SGHT?
OKYO Pharma Limited (OKYO) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -49. 7% for Sight Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OKYO leads at 0. 0% versus -48. 0% for SGHT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGHT leads at 86. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — OKYO or SGHT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is OKYO or SGHT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OKYO Pharma Limited (OKYO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79)). Sight Sciences, Inc. (SGHT) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OKYO: -55. 2%, SGHT: -84. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between OKYO and SGHT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.