Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OM vs FMS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OM
Outset Medical, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$87M
5Y Perf.-99.4%
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNYSE • DE
Market Cap$11.92B
5Y Perf.-49.0%

OM vs FMS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OM logoOM
FMS logoFMS
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Care Facilities
Market Cap$87M$11.92B
Revenue (TTM)$118M$19.36B
Net Income (TTM)$-75M$947M
Gross Margin40.6%26.0%
Operating Margin-56.9%9.7%
Forward P/E10.5x
Total Debt$105M$10.79B
Cash & Equiv.$35M$1.60B

OM vs FMSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OM
FMS
StockSep 20May 26Return
Outset Medical, Inc. (OM)1000.6-99.4%
Fresenius Medical C… (FMS)10051.0-49.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OM vs FMS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FMS leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Outset Medical, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OM
Outset Medical, Inc.
The Growth Play

OM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 85.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.2%
  • 5.1% revenue growth vs FMS's 1.5%
Best for: growth exposure
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
The Income Pick

FMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 3.8%
  • -35.1% 10Y total return vs OM's -99.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 75.6%, current ratio 1.26x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOM logoOM5.1% revenue growth vs FMS's 1.5%
Quality / MarginsFMS logoFMS4.9% margin vs OM's -63.7%
Stability / SafetyFMS logoFMSBeta 0.49 vs OM's 2.49, lower leverage
DividendsFMS logoFMS3.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FMS logoFMS-20.5% vs OM's -60.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FMS logoFMS3.0% ROA vs OM's -27.7%, ROIC 5.6% vs -33.2%

OM vs FMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OMOutset Medical, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
41.5%$85M
Consumables Product
26.5%$54M
Service And Other Revenue
17.0%$35M
Consoles Product
15.0%$31M
FMSFresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
FY 2025
Health Care Services
74.8%$13.1B
Health Care Products
25.2%$4.4B

OM vs FMS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFMSLAGGINGOM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.4B annually — 164.6x OM's $118M. FMS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OM's -63.7%.

MetricOM logoOMOutset Medical, I…FMS logoFMSFresenius Medical…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$118M$19.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$65M$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$75M$947M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$34M$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.6%+26.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-56.9%+9.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-63.7%+4.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-29.1%+9.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.3%-5.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+86.2%-15.4%
FMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricOM logoOMOutset Medical, I…FMS logoFMSFresenius Medical…
Market CapShares × price$87M$11.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$156M$22.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.87x10.96x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.73x0.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.56x0.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.98x
OM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FMS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FMS delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-56 for OM. FMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OM's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMS scores 7/9 vs OM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOM logoOMOutset Medical, I…FMS logoFMSFresenius Medical…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-55.9%+6.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-27.7%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-33.2%+5.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-29.2%+6.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.82x0.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$70M$9.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$35M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$105M$10.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.86x10.17x
FMS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FMS five years ago would be worth $6,410 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $60 for OM. Over the past 12 months, FMS leads with a -20.5% total return vs OM's -60.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FMS at 0.7% vs OM's -75.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOM logoOMOutset Medical, I…FMS logoFMSFresenius Medical…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.5%-7.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-60.1%-20.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%+2.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%-35.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-35.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-75.0%+0.7%
FMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FMS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FMS is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OM's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FMS currently trades 71.1% from its 52-week high vs OM's 21.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOM logoOMOutset Medical, I…FMS logoFMSFresenius Medical…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.49x0.49x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.98$30.46
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.00$20.02
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+21.3%+71.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.336.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded156K527K
FMS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

FMS is the only dividend payer here at 3.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOM logoOMOutset Medical, I…FMS logoFMSFresenius Medical…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts18
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.70
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FMS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallFresenius Medical Care AG &… (FMS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OM vs FMS: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OM or FMS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Outset Medical, Inc.

(OM) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS). Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — OM or FMS?

Over the past 5 years, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.

KGaA (FMS) delivered a total return of -35. 9%, compared to -99. 4% for Outset Medical, Inc. (OM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FMS returned -35. 1% versus OM's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — OM or FMS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.

KGaA (FMS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Outset Medical, Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning OM is approximately 407% more volatile than FMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 82% for Outset Medical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — OM or FMS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Outset Medical, Inc.

(OM) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus 1. 5% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Outset Medical, Inc. grew EPS 85. 5% year-over-year, compared to 82. 6% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA. Over a 3-year CAGR, OM leads at 1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — OM or FMS?

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.

KGaA (FMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -68. 3% for Outset Medical, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMS leads at 9. 3% versus -55. 8% for OM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OM leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — OM or FMS?

In this comparison, FMS (3.

8% yield) pays a dividend. OM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is OM or FMS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.

KGaA (FMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 3. 8% yield). Outset Medical, Inc. (OM) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FMS: -35. 1%, OM: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between OM and FMS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FMS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FMS pays a dividend while OM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

OM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FMS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OM and FMS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OM: -6.3% · FMS: -5.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.