Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OMAB vs DAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
OMAB vs DAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $5.15B | $47.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.96B | $63.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.34B | $5.01B |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 24.5% |
| Operating Margin | 56.0% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $13.59B | $21.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.10B | $4.31B |
OMAB vs DAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (OMAB) | 100 | 302.5 | +202.5% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 290.8 | +190.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMAB vs DAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OMAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 5.0%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- 189.2% 10Y total return vs DAL's 89.5%
DAL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +65.2% vs OMAB's +22.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs DAL's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 13.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.5% margin vs DAL's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs DAL's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DAL's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.2% vs OMAB's +22.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs DAL's 6.2%, ROIC 31.7% vs 12.0% |
OMAB vs DAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OMAB vs DAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.4B annually — 4.0x OMAB's $16.0B. OMAB is the more profitable business, keeping 33.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAL's 7.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.0B | $63.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.8B | $8.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.3B | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.5B | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +24.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, DAL trades at a 43% valuation discount to OMAB's 16.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DAL's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OMAB's 10.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $47.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $64.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.68x | 9.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.77x | 13.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.44x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.14x | 7.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.80x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.10x | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $24 for DAL. DAL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OMAB's 1.19x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.6% | +24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.6% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.7% | +12.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.6% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.5B | $16.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $4.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.6B | $21.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.08x | 9.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMAB five years ago would be worth $25,734 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,667 for DAL. Over the past 12 months, DAL leads with a +65.2% total return vs OMAB's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAL at 29.9% vs OMAB's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +65.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.7% | +119.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.3% | +66.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.2% | +89.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +29.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMAB and DAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAL's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAL currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs OMAB's 79.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.99 | $76.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $87.09 | $44.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 12.2M |
Analyst Outlook
OMAB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OMAB as "Buy" and DAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for OMAB (target: $127) vs 12.5% for DAL (target: $82). For income investors, OMAB offers the higher dividend yield at 5.02% vs DAL's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $127.00 | $82.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $92.57 | $0.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
OMAB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DAL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
OMAB vs DAL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMAB or DAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL). Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OMAB or DAL?
On trailing P/E, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the cheapest at 9. 6x versus Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. at 16. 7x. On forward P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OMAB or DAL?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) delivered a total return of +157. 3%, compared to +66. 7% for Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OMAB returned +189. 2% versus DAL's +89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OMAB or DAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Delta Air Lines, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning DAL is approximately 210% more volatile than OMAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 119% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OMAB or DAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus 2. 8% for Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMAB leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OMAB or DAL?
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 5% net margin versus 7. 9% for Delta Air Lines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMAB leads at 56. 0% versus 9. 2% for DAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMAB leads at 75. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OMAB or DAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for Delta Air Lines, Inc. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMAB: 19. 1% to $127. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OMAB or DAL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL).
09Is OMAB or DAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 5. 0% yield, +189. 2% 10Y return). Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMAB: +189. 2%, DAL: +89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OMAB and DAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.