OMCC vs CSWC vs TPVG vs GAIN vs MRCC

For growth investors, Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) is the stronger pick with 73.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Capital Southwest Corporation at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Monroe Capital Corporation wins at 0. 32x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +72.

0%, compared to -31. 1% for Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +319. 3% versus OMCC's -31. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

04β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 84β — meaning CSWC is approximately -2288% more volatile than OMCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) is pulling ahead at 73.

1% versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Old Market Capital Corporation grew EPS 73. 1% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Capital Southwest Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 72.

7% net margin versus -47. 9% for Old Market Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -77. 2% for OMCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMCC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 7x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRCC: 57. 5% to $8. 00.

In this comparison, TPVG (17.

1% yield), CSWC (10. 2% yield), GAIN (10. 0% yield), MRCC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. OMCC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

53), 10. 0% yield, +319. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +319. 3%, MRCC: +22. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OMCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MRCC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CSWC, TPVG, GAIN pay a dividend while OMCC, MRCC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.