Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OMCC vs MRCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
OMCC vs MRCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $28M | $110M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $21M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | -77.2% | 51.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $191M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $2M |
OMCC vs MRCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old Market Capital … (OMCC) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Monroe Capital Corp… (MRCC) | 100 | 56.9 | -43.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMCC vs MRCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OMCC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.04
- Rev growth 73.1%, EPS growth 73.1%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.04, Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 9.45x
MRCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 22.8% 10Y total return vs OMCC's -31.1%
- NIM 5.8% vs OMCC's 1.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OMCC's 1.8% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 73.1% NII/revenue growth vs MRCC's -39.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OMCC's 1.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (5.7% vs 114.6%) | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.8% vs OMCC's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OMCC's 1.8% |
OMCC vs MRCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OMCC vs MRCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRCC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $21M annually — 2.0x OMCC's $11M. MRCC is the more profitable business, keeping 53.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMCC's -47.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $21M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$335,000 | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.2% | +51.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.9% | +53.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -96.0% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.2% | -51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
OMCC leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $110M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $108M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.32x | 9.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.58x | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRCC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRCC delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for OMCC. OMCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRCC's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRCC scores 6/9 vs OMCC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.3% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $189M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $191M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MRCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRCC five years ago would be worth $9,905 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,891 for OMCC. Over the past 12 months, MRCC leads with a -6.8% total return vs OMCC's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRCC at 5.7% vs OMCC's -11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.4% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.0% | -6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.1% | +18.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.1% | -0.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.1% | +22.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.7% | +5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMCC and MRCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMCC is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRCC's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRCC currently trades 65.5% from its 52-week high vs OMCC's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.84 | $7.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.72 | $4.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.9% | +65.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 156K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
MRCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +20.3% | 0.0% |
MRCC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OMCC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OMCC vs MRCC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMCC or MRCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) is the stronger pick with 73.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OMCC or MRCC?
Over the past 5 years, Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) delivered a total return of -0.
9%, compared to -31. 1% for Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRCC returned +22. 8% versus OMCC's -31. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OMCC or MRCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Monroe Capital Corporation's 0. 74β — meaning MRCC is approximately -2039% more volatile than OMCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 115% for Monroe Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OMCC or MRCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) is pulling ahead at 73.
1% versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Old Market Capital Corporation grew EPS 73. 1% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Monroe Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OMCC or MRCC?
Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the more profitable company, earning 53.
8% net margin versus -47. 9% for Old Market Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRCC leads at 51. 7% versus -77. 2% for OMCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMCC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OMCC or MRCC?
In this comparison, MRCC (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. OMCC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is OMCC or MRCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Market Capital Corporation (OMCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMCC: -31. 1%, MRCC: +22. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OMCC and MRCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OMCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MRCC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.