Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OMEX vs DMLP vs BSM vs AMRC vs VNOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Engineering & Construction
Oil & Gas Midstream
OMEX vs DMLP vs BSM vs AMRC vs VNOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Engineering & Construction | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $36M | $1.26B | $2.83B | $1.57B | $17.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $467K | $169M | $468M | $1.98B | $1.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $69M | $297M | $31M | $-46M |
| Gross Margin | -312.8% | 39.0% | 78.0% | 15.6% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | -21.7% | 33.6% | 76.6% | 6.3% | 43.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 21.7x | 14.7x | 25.0x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $777K | $154M | $1.95B | $2.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $42M | $1M | $72M | $13M |
OMEX vs DMLP vs BSM vs AMRC vs VNOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Odyssey Marine Expl… (OMEX) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Dorchester Minerals… (DMLP) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| Black Stone Mineral… (BSM) | 100 | 210.6 | +110.6% |
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 138.3 | +38.3% |
| Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM) | 100 | 447.9 | +347.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMEX vs DMLP vs BSM vs AMRC vs VNOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, OMEX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DMLP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 10.6%
- 270.1% 10Y total return vs AMRC's 5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 15.54x
- Beta 0.04, yield 10.6%, current ratio 15.54x
BSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.69 vs DMLP's 1.50
- Lower P/E (14.7x vs 20.7x)
- 63.5% margin vs OMEX's -65.7%
- 30.7% ROA vs OMEX's -173.0%
AMRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth -22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
- +134.3% vs DMLP's +5.3%
VNOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 56.6% revenue growth vs DMLP's -5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.6% revenue growth vs DMLP's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.7x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 63.5% margin vs OMEX's -65.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs OMEX's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 10.6% yield, vs BSM's 10.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.3% vs DMLP's +5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.7% ROA vs OMEX's -173.0% |
OMEX vs DMLP vs BSM vs AMRC vs VNOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OMEX vs DMLP vs BSM vs AMRC vs VNOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSM leads in 3 of 6 categories
VNOM leads 1 • DMLP leads 1 • OMEX leads 0 • AMRC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 4240.3x OMEX's $467,122. BSM is the more profitable business, keeping 63.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMEX's -65.7%. On growth, VNOM holds the edge at +102.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $467,122 | $169M | $468M | $2.0B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $127M | $398M | $204M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $69M | $297M | $31M | -$46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $123M | $161M | -$251M | -$4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +39.0% | +78.0% | +15.6% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.7% | +33.6% | +76.6% | +6.3% | +43.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -65.7% | +40.8% | +63.5% | +1.6% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.9% | +73.0% | +34.4% | -12.7% | -2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.5% | +36.4% | +63.5% | +13.8% | +102.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -575.5% | +66.7% | -31.5% | -2.5% | -14.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BSM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, BSM trades at a 71% valuation discount to AMRC's 35.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSM offers better value at 0.49x vs DMLP's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $1.3B | $2.8B | $1.6B | $17.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54M | $1.2B | $3.0B | $3.4B | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.07x | 21.73x | 10.43x | 35.76x | -97.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.67x | 25.04x | 20.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 0.49x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.84x | 9.99x | 15.00x | 16.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 46.88x | 8.23x | 6.71x | 0.81x | 13.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.07x | 2.51x | 1.41x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 64.59x | 9.50x | 9.50x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSM delivers a 35.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-0 for VNOM. DMLP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMEX scores 6/9 vs VNOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +22.1% | +35.5% | +2.9% | -0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -173.0% | +21.7% | +30.7% | +0.7% | -0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.7% | +16.1% | +3.3% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.2% | +20.9% | +3.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.14x | 1.73x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$41M | $153M | $1.9B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $42M | $1M | $72M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $777,000 | $154M | $1.9B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | — | 40.14x | 1.20x | 2.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VNOM five years ago would be worth $30,312 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,052 for OMEX. Over the past 12 months, AMRC leads with a +134.3% total return vs DMLP's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNOM at 25.6% vs OMEX's -26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.7% | +17.5% | +1.0% | -3.2% | +22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.4% | +5.3% | +7.3% | +134.3% | +25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.7% | +23.6% | +14.4% | -29.9% | +98.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.5% | +175.1% | +94.7% | -44.0% | +203.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.3% | +270.1% | +60.6% | +542.4% | +245.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.1% | +7.3% | +4.6% | -11.2% | +25.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DMLP and VNOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DMLP is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OMEX's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNOM currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs OMEX's 28.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 0.04x | 0.15x | 2.03x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.43 | $28.95 | $15.49 | $44.93 | $51.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $20.85 | $11.78 | $12.37 | $35.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.7% | +90.1% | +86.2% | +66.1% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 31.5 | 35.2 | 68.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 173K | 437K | 507K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
DMLP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSM as "Buy", AMRC as "Buy", VNOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for AMRC (target: $43) vs 15.4% for VNOM (target: $54). For income investors, DMLP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.62% vs VNOM's 4.90%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $17.33 | $43.17 | $54.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 23 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.6% | +10.1% | — | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.77 | $1.35 | — | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.1% |
BSM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VNOM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OMEX vs DMLP vs BSM vs AMRC vs VNOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Viper Energy, Inc.
(VNOM) is the stronger pick with 56. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Dorchester Minerals, L. P. (DMLP). Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM?
On trailing P/E, Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. (BSM) is the cheapest at 10. 4x versus Ameresco, Inc. at 35. 8x. On forward P/E, Black Stone Minerals, L. P. is actually cheaper at 14. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM?
Over the past 5 years, Viper Energy, Inc.
(VNOM) delivered a total return of +203. 1%, compared to -79. 5% for Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (OMEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +542. 4% versus OMEX's -47. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dorchester Minerals, L.
P. (DMLP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning OMEX is approximately 6711% more volatile than DMLP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dorchester Minerals, L. P. (DMLP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viper Energy, Inc.
(VNOM) is pulling ahead at 56. 6% versus -5. 4% for Dorchester Minerals, L. P. (DMLP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Black Stone Minerals, L. P. grew EPS 11. 3% year-over-year, compared to -112. 6% for Viper Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNOM leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM?
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
(OMEX) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -5. 1% for Viper Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSM leads at 61. 8% versus -1561. 8% for OMEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSM leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. (BSM) trades at 14. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Ameresco, Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMRC: 45. 5% to $43. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM?
In this comparison, DMLP (10.
6% yield), BSM (10. 1% yield), VNOM (4. 9% yield) pay a dividend. OMEX, AMRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OMEX or DMLP or BSM or AMRC or VNOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dorchester Minerals, L.
P. (DMLP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 10. 6% yield, +270. 1% 10Y return). Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (OMEX) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DMLP: +270. 1%, OMEX: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OMEX and DMLP and BSM and AMRC and VNOM?
These companies operate in different sectors (OMEX (Industrials) and DMLP (Energy) and BSM (Energy) and AMRC (Industrials) and VNOM (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OMEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DMLP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VNOM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. DMLP, BSM, VNOM pay a dividend while OMEX, AMRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.