OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$195M
5Y Perf.-45.9%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OMSE vs NINE vs PUMP vs ACDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+1973.7%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.+188.0%
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$1.19B
5Y Perf.-21.1%
OMSE vs NINE vs PUMP vs ACDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OMSE | NINE | PUMP | ACDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $195M | $427M | $1.91B | $1.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $204M | $571M | $1.18B | $1.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $45M | $-41M | $-12M | $-367M |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.4% | 2.0% | -1.1% | -8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.1x | — | 1993.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $7M | $383M | $249M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $73M | $18M | $91M | $23M |
OMSE vs NINE vs PUMP vs ACDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OMSE
NINE
PUMP
ACDC
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OMS Energy Technolo… (OMSE) | 100 | 54.1 | -45.9% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 2073.7 | +1973.7% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 288.0 | +188.0% |
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMSE vs NINE vs PUMP vs ACDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OMSE leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Nine Energy Service, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
The Income Pick
OMSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.17
- Rev growth 108.9%, EPS growth 307.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 5.4%, current ratio 5.11x
- Beta 0.17, current ratio 5.11x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick
NINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +15.1% vs OMSE's -38.7%
Best for: momentum
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
The Secondary Option
ACDC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OMSE | 108.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% |
| Value | OMSE | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | OMSE | 22.0% margin vs ACDC's -18.9% |
| Stability / Safety | OMSE | Beta 0.17 vs NINE's 3.21 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NINE | +15.1% vs OMSE's -38.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OMSE | 33.1% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 114.6% vs -4.6% |
OMSE vs NINE vs PUMP vs ACDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
OMSE vs NINE vs PUMP vs ACDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOMSELAGGINGACDC
Who Leads Where
OMSE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NINE leads 1 • PUMP leads 0 • ACDC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.
0leads
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
0leads
NINENine Energy Service, …
1leads
OMSEOMS Energy Technologi…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NINEvs PUMPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OMSE4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OMSE9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NINE5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 9.5x OMSE's $204M. OMSE is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, ACDC holds the edge at -4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OMSEOMS Energy Techno… | NINENine Energy Servi… | PUMPProPetro Holding … | ACDCProFrac Holding C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $204M | $571M | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $61M | $154M | $251M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$41M | -$12M | -$367M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$7M | -$11M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +11.5% | +8.3% | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +2.0% | -1.1% | -8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | -7.2% | -1.1% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | -1.2% | -0.9% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -4.4% | -24.7% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -34.6% | -134.2% | -33.3% |
OMSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OMSE and ACDC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, OMSE trades at a 100% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OMSE's 2.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | OMSEOMS Energy Techno… | NINENine Energy Servi… | PUMPProPetro Holding … | ACDCProFrac Holding C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $195M | $427M | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $130M | $791M | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.34x | -7.88x | 1993.59x | -2.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.08x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.02x | 337.01x | 10.67x | 8.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.96x | — | 1.50x | 0.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | — | 1.98x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.19x | — | 44.88x | 60.74x |
Evenly matched — OMSE and ACDC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMSE leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMSE delivers a 53.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. OMSE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMSE scores 8/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | OMSEOMS Energy Techno… | NINENine Energy Servi… | PUMPProPetro Holding … | ACDCProFrac Holding C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +53.1% | — | -1.4% | -38.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +33.1% | -11.5% | -1.0% | -13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +114.6% | +0.7% | +1.4% | -4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +64.4% | +0.9% | +1.8% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | — | 0.30x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $364M | $158M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $73M | $18M | $91M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $383M | $249M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 210.79x | 0.24x | -0.86x | -1.22x |
OMSE leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,633 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs OMSE's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 35.7% vs OMSE's -15.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OMSEOMS Energy Techno… | NINENine Energy Servi… | PUMPProPetro Holding … | ACDCProFrac Holding C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +2682.5% | +58.4% | +62.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.7% | +1505.8% | +201.4% | +55.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | +150.0% | +132.8% | -35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | +385.2% | +41.6% | -63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | -62.3% | +7.2% | -63.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.1% | +35.7% | +32.5% | -13.6% |
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMSE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs OMSE's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OMSEOMS Energy Techno… | NINENine Energy Servi… | PUMPProPetro Holding … | ACDCProFrac Holding C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 3.21x | 1.12x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.86 | $10.23 | $18.50 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.27 | $0.00 | $4.51 | $3.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.7% | +96.3% | +84.1% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 82.9 | 51.9 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 125K | 3.5M | 1.5M |
Evenly matched — OMSE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -8.8% for ACDC (target: $6).
| Metric | OMSEOMS Energy Techno… | NINENine Energy Servi… | PUMPProPetro Holding … | ACDCProFrac Holding C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $14.75 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 30 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
OMSE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NINE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallOMS Energy Technologies Inc. (OMSE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OMSE vs NINE vs PUMP vs ACDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
(OMSE) is the stronger pick with 108. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). OMS Energy Technologies Inc. (OMSE) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC?
On trailing P/E, OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
(OMSE) is the cheapest at 4. 3x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -63. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PUMP returned +7. 2% versus ACDC's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
(OMSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 1836% more volatile than OMSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OMS Energy Technologies Inc. (OMSE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
(OMSE) is pulling ahead at 108. 9% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OMS Energy Technologies Inc. grew EPS 307. 7% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PUMP leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC?
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
(OMSE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMSE leads at 29. 4% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMSE leads at 33. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82.
7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OMSE or NINE or PUMP or ACDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
(OMSE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMSE: -38. 7%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OMSE and NINE and PUMP and ACDC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OMSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OMSE: 108.9% · NINE: -4.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.