Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $33.87B | $6.91B | $2.50B | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.74B | $51M | $236M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $513M | $-315M | $-369M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | 88.3% | 33.2% | 90.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | -7.0% | -168.6% | — |
| Forward P/E | 51.9x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2.00B | $82M | $99M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.55B | $357M | $222M | $714M |
ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) | 100 | 131.2 | +31.2% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 265.3 | +165.3% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.70
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 55.7%
- 10.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +209.6% vs ONC's +36.5%
IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs ONC's +36.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONC leads in 2 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • RCUS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONC and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $5.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. ONC is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $51M | $236M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $948M | -$352M | -$391M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $513M | -$315M | -$369M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $846M | -$244M | -$489M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.3% | +33.2% | +90.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | -7.0% | -168.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -6.1% | -156.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -4.7% | -2.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.5% | +55.5% | -39.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2547.0% | +13.4% | +10.5% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ONC and KYMR and RCUS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.9B | $6.9B | $2.5B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.3B | $6.6B | $2.4B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.64x | -22.93x | -7.54x | -9.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 51.91x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.20x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.34x | 176.26x | 10.11x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.25x | 4.52x | 4.22x | 5.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.97x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ONC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ONC delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONC's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONC scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | -25.0% | -69.0% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.7% | -22.3% | -35.3% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.6% | -24.9% | -64.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | -27.2% | -42.1% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.05x | 0.16x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.5B | -$275M | -$123M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.5B | $357M | $222M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $82M | $99M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.46x | -2119.53x | -13.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,143 for RCUS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs ONC's +36.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.0% vs ONC's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +16.3% | +6.5% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.5% | +190.7% | +209.6% | +96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.8% | +205.1% | +24.9% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | +92.1% | -18.6% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1045.6% | +154.4% | +45.9% | +173.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +45.0% | +7.7% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ONC and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ONC is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs KYMR's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.15x | 1.95x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $385.22 | $103.00 | $28.72 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $218.31 | $28.06 | $7.06 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +82.2% | +86.3% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 54.1 | 60.5 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 237K | 602K | 1.2M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ONC as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $401.29 | $117.06 | $30.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 26 | 18 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ONC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (51. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -18. 6% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONC returned +1046% versus RCUS's +45. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 180% more volatile than ONC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 46% for BeOne Medicines Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BeOne Medicines Ltd. grew EPS 637. 4% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONC leads at 55. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT?
BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 4% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ONC leads at 8. 4% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 67.
2% to $45. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), +1046% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONC: +1046%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ONC and KYMR and RCUS and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ONC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.