REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ONL vs PGRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
ONL vs PGRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $161M | $1.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-144M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | -68.8% | 14.7% |
| Total Debt | $482M | $3.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $375M |
ONL vs PGRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orion Properties In… (ONL) | 100 | 16.2 | -83.8% |
| Paramount Group, In… (PGRE) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONL vs PGRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 5.6%
- 5.6% yield, vs PGRE's 1.6%
- +46.7% vs PGRE's +38.7%
PGRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.0%, EPS growth 82.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- -46.2% 10Y total return vs ONL's -83.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 91.7%, current ratio 7.76x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ONL's -10.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.5% margin vs ONL's -98.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs ONL's 1.28 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, vs PGRE's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs PGRE's +38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.2% ROA vs ONL's -11.8%, ROIC 1.5% vs -6.2% |
ONL vs PGRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ONL vs PGRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $723M annually — 5.0x ONL's $146M. PGRE is the more profitable business, keeping -13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ONL's -98.4%. On growth, ONL holds the edge at -4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$45M | $342M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$144M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.7% | +57.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -68.8% | +14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -98.4% | -13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | -11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.2% | -191.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ONL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $621M | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.15x | -31.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PGRE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PGRE delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-22 for ONL. ONL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PGRE's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGRE scores 7/9 vs ONL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.9% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | -1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.2% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $460M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $375M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $482M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.41x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PGRE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PGRE five years ago would be worth $6,949 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,656 for ONL. Over the past 12 months, ONL leads with a +46.7% total return vs PGRE's +38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PGRE at 14.9% vs ONL's -16.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.5% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +38.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.5% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.4% | -30.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.4% | -46.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.4% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ONL and PGRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ONL currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs PGRE's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.05 | $7.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.63 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 322K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ONL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ONL as "Buy" and PGRE as "Hold". For income investors, ONL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.62% vs PGRE's 1.59%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.0% |
PGRE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ONL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ONL vs PGRE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONL or PGRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the stronger pick with 2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Orion Properties Inc. (ONL). Analysts rate Orion Properties Inc. (ONL) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ONL or PGRE?
Over the past 5 years, Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) delivered a total return of -30. 5%, compared to -83. 4% for Orion Properties Inc. (ONL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGRE returned -46. 2% versus ONL's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ONL or PGRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Orion Properties Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning ONL is approximately 326% more volatile than PGRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orion Properties Inc. (ONL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 92% for Paramount Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ONL or PGRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is pulling ahead at 2. 0% versus -10. 4% for Orion Properties Inc. (ONL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Paramount Group, Inc. grew EPS 82. 5% year-over-year, compared to -34. 8% for Orion Properties Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PGRE leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ONL or PGRE?
Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 1% net margin versus -94. 4% for Orion Properties Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGRE leads at 19. 6% versus -65. 4% for ONL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PGRE leads at 60. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ONL or PGRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Orion Properties Inc. (ONL) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 1. 6% for Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE).
07Is ONL or PGRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGRE: -46. 2%, ONL: -83. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ONL and PGRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ONL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PGRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.