Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ONMD vs INVA vs NVCR vs PRGO vs IDXX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ONMD vs INVA vs NVCR vs PRGO vs IDXX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $33M | $1.69B | $2.04B | $1.62B | $44.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $424M | $674M | $4.18B | $4.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $504M | $-173M | $-1.82B | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | -37.0% | 76.2% | 75.2% | 34.2% | 62.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.1% | 14.8% | -27.2% | -4.1% | 31.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.3x | — | 5.5x | 38.3x |
| Total Debt | $570K | $269M | $290M | $3.97B | $1.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $585K | $551M | $103M | $532M | $180M |
ONMD vs INVA vs NVCR vs PRGO vs IDXX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneMedNet Corporati… (ONMD) | 100 | 10.3 | -89.7% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 170.7 | +70.7% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 25.5 | -74.5% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONMD vs INVA vs NVCR vs PRGO vs IDXX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 111.4% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
- +131.8% vs PRGO's -52.0%
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- PEG 0.71 vs IDXX's 2.68
- Beta 0.11, current ratio 14.64x
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
IDXX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs INVA's 95.6%
- 32.6% ROA vs ONMD's -145.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 111.4% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 38.3x), PEG 0.71 vs 2.68 | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs ONMD's -206.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.8% vs PRGO's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs ONMD's -145.0% |
ONMD vs INVA vs NVCR vs PRGO vs IDXX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ONMD vs INVA vs NVCR vs PRGO vs IDXX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories
IDXX leads 1 • PRGO leads 1 • ONMD leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDXX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 3271.6x ONMD's $1M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ONMD's -2.1%. On growth, ONMD holds the edge at +33.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $424M | $674M | $4.2B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $86M | -$165M | $58M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $504M | -$173M | -$1.8B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $181M | -$48M | $108M | $845M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -37.0% | +76.2% | +75.2% | +34.2% | +62.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +14.8% | -27.2% | -4.1% | +31.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +118.9% | -25.7% | -43.5% | +24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +42.6% | -7.1% | +2.6% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.2% | +10.6% | +12.3% | -7.2% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | +4.0% | -100.0% | -56.4% | +16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INVA and PRGO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 84% valuation discount to IDXX's 42.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), INVA offers better value at 0.67x vs IDXX's 3.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $1.7B | $2.0B | $1.6B | $44.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $1.4B | $2.2B | $5.1B | $45.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.00x | 6.94x | -14.66x | -1.14x | 42.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.31x | — | 5.53x | 38.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x | — | — | 3.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.90x | — | 7.43x | 30.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.61x | 3.97x | 3.11x | 0.38x | 10.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.65x | 5.86x | 0.55x | 28.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.63x | — | 11.17x | 42.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. INVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDXX scores 7/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +47.6% | -50.8% | -50.7% | +70.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -145.0% | +32.4% | -16.5% | -19.8% | +32.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.2% | -16.4% | +3.7% | +42.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +12.4% | -28.9% | +4.3% | +61.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.23x | 0.85x | 1.35x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15,000 | -$282M | $187M | $3.4B | $897M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $585,000 | $551M | $103M | $532M | $180M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $570,000 | $269M | $290M | $4.0B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -40.79x | 63.45x | -96.80x | -7.20x | 35.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,448 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, ONMD leads with a +131.8% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.1% vs ONMD's -54.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.4% | +15.2% | +36.4% | -13.6% | -16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +131.8% | +23.2% | +2.6% | -52.0% | +14.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | +96.0% | -74.2% | -58.1% | +15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +94.5% | -90.2% | -60.3% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +95.6% | +38.5% | -77.7% | +542.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.4% | +25.1% | -36.4% | -25.2% | +4.9% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs ONMD's 24.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.11x | 2.15x | 1.21x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.22 | $25.15 | $20.06 | $28.44 | $769.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $16.52 | $9.82 | $9.23 | $485.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.2% | +91.0% | +89.2% | +41.2% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 44.7 | 70.9 | 53.1 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 604K | 1.4M | 3.3M | 535K |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INVA as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", IDXX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 33.5% for IDXX (target: $748). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 | $33.50 | $36.20 | $747.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 15 | 36 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IDXX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ONMD vs INVA vs NVCR vs PRGO vs IDXX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OneMedNet Corporation (ONMD) is the stronger pick with 111.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. at 42. 8x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innoviva, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 5%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +542. 3% versus ONMD's -89. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 1787% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OneMedNet Corporation (ONMD) is pulling ahead at 111.
4% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVA leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -206. 1% for OneMedNet Corporation — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -711. 3% for ONMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 38. 3x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 32. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ONMD, INVA, NVCR, IDXX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ONMD or INVA or NVCR or PRGO or IDXX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +95. 6%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ONMD and INVA and NVCR and PRGO and IDXX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ONMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while ONMD, INVA, NVCR, IDXX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.