Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OP
OceanPal Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
DSX
Diana Shipping Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • GR
Market Cap$339M
5Y Perf.-35.5%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.10B
5Y Perf.+27.7%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+68.1%
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.+187.4%

OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OP logoOP
DSX logoDSX
SBLK logoSBLK
GNK logoGNK
NMM logoNMM
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$3M$339M$3.10B$1.13B$2.16B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$219M$1.04B$114.70B$1.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$24M$84M$9.32B$262M
Gross Margin0.6%42.1%33.0%62.9%56.7%
Operating Margin-97.3%21.8%13.6%0.0%28.2%
Forward P/E6.9x7.2x14.0x4.9x
Total Debt$0.00$638M$1.07B$200M$1.42B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$125M$500M$56M$270M

OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OP
DSX
SBLK
GNK
NMM
StockNov 21May 26Return
OceanPal Inc. (OP)1000.0-100.0%
Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX)10064.5-35.5%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100127.7+27.7%
Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK)100168.1+68.1%
Navios Maritime Par… (NMM)100287.4+187.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NMM leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. OceanPal Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OP
OceanPal Inc.
The Income Pick

OP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 64.5%
  • Rev growth 35.6%, EPS growth 31.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 168.1%
  • Beta 0.99, yield 64.5%, current ratio 2.77x
  • 35.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DSX
Diana Shipping Inc.
The Income Angle

DSX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: industrials exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs GNK's 411.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Value Play

NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.9x vs 14.0x)
  • 19.9% margin vs OP's -96.7%
  • Beta 0.71 vs DSX's 1.46, lower leverage
  • +103.9% vs OP's -97.7%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOP logoOP35.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
ValueNMM logoNMMLower P/E (4.9x vs 14.0x)
Quality / MarginsNMM logoNMM19.9% margin vs OP's -96.7%
Stability / SafetyNMM logoNMMBeta 0.71 vs DSX's 1.46, lower leverage
DividendsOP logoOP64.5% yield, vs NMM's 0.3%
Momentum (1Y)NMM logoNMM+103.9% vs OP's -97.7%
Efficiency (ROA)NMM logoNMM4.4% ROA vs OP's -21.3%, ROIC 8.3% vs -17.5%

OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OPOceanPal Inc.
FY 2024
Tanker Segment
100.0%$934,000
DSXDiana Shipping Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited
FY 2025
Cargo and Freight
100.0%$342M
NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P.

Segment breakdown not available.

OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 5901.7x OP's $19M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OP's -96.7%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.DSX logoDSXDiana Shipping In…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$219M$1.0B$114.7B$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M$93M$311M$112M$693M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M$24M$84M$9.3B$262M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$20M$0$209M-$173M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.6%+42.1%+33.0%+62.9%+56.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-97.3%+21.8%+13.6%+0.0%+28.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-96.7%+11.2%+8.1%+8.1%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-104.0%+26.0%+20.0%-0.2%+2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-54.3%-9.8%-2.7%+1604.6%+1.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.1%+172.5%+58.3%+175.0%-40.6%
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — OP and NMM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.3x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 86% valuation discount to DSX's 46.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.7x.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.DSX logoDSXDiana Shipping In…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Market CapShares × price$3M$339M$3.1B$1.1B$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$5M$852M$3.7B$1.3B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.22x46.09x36.75x-259.10x6.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.86x7.17x14.00x4.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.22x11.88x14.73x5.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x1.49x2.97x3.30x1.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x0.64x1.26x1.25x0.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.72x14.74x
Evenly matched — OP and NMM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-23 for OP. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DSX's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NMM scores 7/9 vs OP's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.DSX logoDSXDiana Shipping In…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.2%+4.9%+3.4%+4.2%+8.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.3%+2.1%+2.2%+3.0%+4.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-17.5%+4.3%+3.2%+0.7%+8.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.4%+5.4%+4.0%+0.9%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926537
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.26x0.44x0.22x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M$513M$572M$145M$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$125M$500M$56M$270M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$638M$1.1B$200M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-141.83x1.40x2.08x0.00x2.78x
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $23,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $49 for OP. Over the past 12 months, NMM leads with a +103.9% total return vs OP's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 49.1% vs OP's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.DSX logoDSXDiana Shipping In…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-63.4%+61.9%+40.4%+43.2%+46.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.7%+97.8%+79.2%+98.8%+103.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%-7.1%+60.7%+108.0%+231.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+16.2%+82.4%+100.2%+137.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+60.1%+977.9%+411.9%+283.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-85.1%-2.4%+17.1%+27.6%+49.1%
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GNK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DSX's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs OP's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.DSX logoDSXDiana Shipping In…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.99x1.46x0.74x1.03x0.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1585.00$2.77$27.20$26.09$77.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.12$1.38$14.85$12.66$35.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.5%+97.8%+98.6%+99.3%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.861.771.560.252.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded307K666K1.4M408K166K
Evenly matched — GNK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — OP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DSX as "Hold", SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy", NMM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs 8.1% for SBLK (target: $29). For income investors, OP offers the higher dividend yield at 64.53% vs NMM's 0.27%.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.DSX logoDSXDiana Shipping In…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.00$29.00$29.00$85.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts27242214
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+64.5%+9.0%+1.1%+2.9%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.48$0.24$0.30$0.76$0.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.2%0.0%+1.2%
Evenly matched — OP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, OceanPal Inc.

(OP) is the stronger pick with 35. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 3x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 3x versus Diana Shipping Inc. at 46. 1x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -99. 5% for OceanPal Inc. (OP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 9% versus OP's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Diana Shipping Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning DSX is approximately 105% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 126% for Diana Shipping Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), OceanPal Inc.

(OP) is pulling ahead at 35. 6% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OceanPal Inc. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, OP leads at 168. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 5% net margin versus -69. 5% for OceanPal Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMM leads at 33. 6% versus -70. 2% for OP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) trades at 4. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 0x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 13. 4% to $85. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

OceanPal Inc. (OP) offers the highest yield at 64. 5%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).

09

Is OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK or NMM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 1% yield, +977. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 9%, DSX: +60. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OP and DSX and SBLK and GNK and NMM?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OP is a small-cap high-growth stock; DSX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock. OP, DSX, SBLK, GNK pay a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 25.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DSX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 80229%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NMM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OP and DSX and SBLK and GNK and NMM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OP: -54.3% · DSX: -9.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.