Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OP
OceanPal Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$740M
5Y Perf.+94.2%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.10B
5Y Perf.+3.9%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+68.1%

OP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OP logoOP
SB logoSB
SBLK logoSBLK
GNK logoGNK
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$3M$740M$3.10B$1.13B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$275M$1.04B$114.70B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$46M$84M$9.32B
Gross Margin0.6%36.9%33.0%62.9%
Operating Margin-97.3%26.0%13.6%0.0%
Forward P/E12.8x7.2x14.0x
Total Debt$0.00$537M$1.07B$200M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$84M$500M$56M

OP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OP
SB
SBLK
GNK
StockNov 21May 26Return
OceanPal Inc. (OP)1000.0-100.0%
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)100194.2+94.2%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100127.7+27.7%
Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK)100168.1+68.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SB leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. OceanPal Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. SBLK also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OP
OceanPal Inc.
The Growth Play

OP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.

  • Rev growth 35.6%, EPS growth 31.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 168.1%
  • Beta 0.99, yield 64.5%, current ratio 2.77x
  • 35.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
  • 64.5% yield, vs SB's 3.9%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Income Pick

SB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 3.9%
  • 16.8% margin vs OP's -96.7%
  • +111.4% vs OP's -97.7%
  • 3.4% ROA vs OP's -21.3%, ROIC 6.6% vs -17.5%
Best for: income & stability
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs GNK's 411.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Lower P/E (7.2x vs 14.0x)
  • Beta 0.74 vs GNK's 1.03
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle

GNK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOP logoOP35.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
ValueSBLK logoSBLKLower P/E (7.2x vs 14.0x)
Quality / MarginsSB logoSB16.8% margin vs OP's -96.7%
Stability / SafetySBLK logoSBLKBeta 0.74 vs GNK's 1.03
DividendsOP logoOP64.5% yield, vs SB's 3.9%
Momentum (1Y)SB logoSB+111.4% vs OP's -97.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SB logoSB3.4% ROA vs OP's -21.3%, ROIC 6.6% vs -17.5%

OP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OPOceanPal Inc.
FY 2024
Tanker Segment
100.0%$934,000
SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited
FY 2025
Cargo and Freight
100.0%$342M

OP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSBLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 5901.7x OP's $19M. SB is the more profitable business, keeping 16.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OP's -96.7%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$275M$1.0B$114.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M$131M$311M$112M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M$46M$84M$9.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$20M$55M$209M-$173M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.6%+36.9%+33.0%+62.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-97.3%+26.0%+13.6%+0.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-96.7%+16.8%+8.1%+8.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-104.0%+19.9%+20.0%-0.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-54.3%-3.7%-2.7%+1604.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.1%-31.8%+58.3%+175.0%
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OP leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, SB trades at a 77% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SB's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.7x.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
Market CapShares × price$3M$740M$3.1B$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$5M$1.2B$3.7B$1.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.22x8.47x36.75x-259.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.78x7.17x14.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.02x11.88x14.73x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x2.41x2.97x3.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x0.91x1.26x1.25x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.74x
OP leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SB delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-23 for OP. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SB's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs OP's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.2%+5.6%+3.4%+4.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.3%+3.4%+2.2%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-17.5%+6.6%+3.2%+0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.4%+8.6%+4.0%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92753
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.65x0.44x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M$453M$572M$145M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$84M$500M$56M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$537M$1.1B$200M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-141.83x2.34x2.08x0.00x
SB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GNK five years ago would be worth $20,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $49 for OP. Over the past 12 months, SB leads with a +111.4% total return vs OP's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SB at 27.7% vs OP's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-63.4%+46.6%+40.4%+43.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.7%+111.4%+79.2%+98.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+108.5%+60.7%+108.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+78.3%+82.4%+100.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+775.6%+977.9%+411.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-85.1%+27.7%+17.1%+27.6%
SB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBLK and GNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GNK's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs OP's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.99x0.96x0.74x1.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1585.00$7.20$27.20$26.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.12$3.33$14.85$12.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.5%+97.6%+98.6%+99.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.861.471.560.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded307K562K1.4M408K
Evenly matched — SBLK and GNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — OP and SB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SB as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for GNK (target: $29) vs -40.3% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, OP offers the higher dividend yield at 64.53% vs SBLK's 1.11%.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.20$29.00$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts222422
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+64.5%+3.9%+1.1%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0300
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.48$0.27$0.30$0.76
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.9%+3.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — OP and SB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallSafe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OP or SB or SBLK or GNK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, OceanPal Inc.

(OP) is the stronger pick with 35. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OP or SB or SBLK or GNK?

On trailing P/E, Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OP or SB or SBLK or GNK?

Over the past 5 years, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) delivered a total return of +100.

2%, compared to -99. 5% for OceanPal Inc. (OP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 9% versus OP's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OP or SB or SBLK or GNK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Genco Shipping & Trading Limited's 1. 03β — meaning GNK is approximately 39% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 65% for Safe Bulkers, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OP or SB or SBLK or GNK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), OceanPal Inc.

(OP) is pulling ahead at 35. 6% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, OP leads at 168. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OP or SB or SBLK or GNK?

Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -69. 5% for OceanPal Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus -70. 2% for OP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SB leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OP or SB or SBLK or GNK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 0x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GNK: 11. 9% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OP or SB or SBLK or GNK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

OceanPal Inc. (OP) offers the highest yield at 64. 5%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).

09

Is OP or SB or SBLK or GNK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 1% yield, +977. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 9%, OP: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OP and SB and SBLK and GNK?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OP is a small-cap high-growth stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 25.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 80229%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OP and SB and SBLK and GNK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OP: -54.3% · SB: -3.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.