Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OPK vs PRGO vs PAHC vs NKTR vs LH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
OPK vs PRGO vs PAHC vs NKTR vs LH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $861M | $1.62B | $1.62B | $1.66B | $20.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $581M | $4.18B | $1.46B | $56M | $14.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-213M | $-1.82B | $92M | $-158M | $942M |
| Gross Margin | 47.7% | 34.2% | 31.9% | 80.1% | 27.8% |
| Operating Margin | -17.4% | -4.1% | 11.6% | -226.3% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.5x | 13.1x | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $434M | $3.97B | $762M | $149M | $7.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $369M | $532M | $68M | $15M | $532M |
OPK vs PRGO vs PAHC vs NKTR vs LH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPKO Health, Inc. (OPK) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| Phibro Animal Healt… (PAHC) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Labcorp Holdings In… (LH) | 100 | 168.7 | +68.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPK vs PRGO vs PAHC vs NKTR vs LH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 34.2%, current ratio 3.97x
PRGO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.21, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 14.1x)
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs PAHC's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PAHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 27.4% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
- 6.7% ROA vs NKTR's -40.7%, ROIC 9.8% vs -57.2%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.8% vs PRGO's -52.0%
LH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 147.0% 10Y total return vs PAHC's 113.5%
- 6.7% margin vs NKTR's -284.2%
- Beta 0.49 vs NKTR's 1.80, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.7% margin vs NKTR's -284.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs NKTR's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs PAHC's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs PRGO's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs NKTR's -40.7%, ROIC 9.8% vs -57.2% |
OPK vs PRGO vs PAHC vs NKTR vs LH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OPK vs PRGO vs PAHC vs NKTR vs LH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAHC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • NKTR leads 1 • LH leads 1 • OPK leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAHC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LH is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.1B annually — 254.2x NKTR's $56M. LH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -2.8%. On growth, PAHC holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $581M | $4.2B | $1.5B | $56M | $14.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $58M | $220M | -$125M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$213M | -$1.8B | $92M | -$158M | $942M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$174M | $108M | $47M | -$160M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.7% | +34.2% | +31.9% | +80.1% | +27.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | -4.1% | +11.6% | -2.3% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.6% | -43.5% | +6.3% | -2.8% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.0% | +2.6% | +3.2% | -2.9% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.2% | -7.2% | +20.9% | +3.8% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.0% | -56.4% | +7.4% | +49.7% | +32.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.3x trailing earnings, LH trades at a 28% valuation discount to PAHC's 33.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAHC's 14.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $861M | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $20.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $925M | $5.1B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $27.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.80x | -1.14x | 33.61x | -8.42x | 24.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.53x | 13.10x | — | 14.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.50x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.43x | 14.83x | — | 12.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 0.38x | 1.25x | 30.09x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 0.55x | 5.70x | 15.38x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.17x | 38.76x | — | 17.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC delivers a 30.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-87 for NKTR. OPK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAHC's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LH scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.8% | -50.7% | +30.8% | -87.0% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.0% | -19.8% | +6.7% | -40.7% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.9% | +3.7% | +9.8% | -57.2% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.5% | +4.3% | +12.0% | -55.7% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 1.35x | 2.67x | 1.66x | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $65M | $3.4B | $694M | $134M | $6.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $369M | $532M | $68M | $15M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $434M | $4.0B | $762M | $149M | $7.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.10x | -7.20x | 3.64x | -6.23x | 6.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAHC five years ago would be worth $15,750 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,767 for NKTR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +782.4% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 92.1% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | -13.6% | +7.6% | +88.6% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.5% | -52.0% | +81.9% | +782.4% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | -58.1% | +188.4% | +609.0% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.8% | -60.3% | +57.5% | -72.3% | +11.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -77.7% | +113.5% | -59.8% | +147.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.1% | -25.2% | +42.3% | +92.1% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LH is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LH currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 1.21x | 1.35x | 1.80x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.60 | $28.44 | $60.08 | $109.00 | $293.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $9.23 | $19.17 | $7.99 | $239.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.3% | +41.2% | +66.6% | +75.1% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 53.1 | 32.0 | 50.5 | 42.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 3.3M | 315K | 977K | 578K |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPK as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", PAHC as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", LH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 22.5% for PAHC (target: $49). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.82% vs LH's 1.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.87 | $36.20 | $49.00 | $147.33 | $311.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 36 | 13 | 33 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +9.8% | +1.2% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | $0.48 | — | $2.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.2% |
PAHC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
OPK vs PRGO vs PAHC vs NKTR vs LH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the stronger pick with 27.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OPKO Health, Inc. (OPK) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH?
On trailing P/E, Labcorp Holdings Inc.
(LH) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus Phibro Animal Health Corporation at 33. 6x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH?
Over the past 5 years, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) delivered a total return of +57.
5%, compared to -72. 3% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LH returned +147. 0% versus OPK's -88. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Labcorp Holdings Inc.
(LH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 80β — meaning NKTR is approximately 270% more volatile than LH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OPKO Health, Inc. (OPK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 3% for Phibro Animal Health Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is pulling ahead at 27.
4% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phibro Animal Health Corporation grew EPS 1883% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAHC leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH?
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
(LH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LH leads at 10. 9% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Labcorp Holdings Inc. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), PAHC (1. 2% yield), LH (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. OPK, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPK or PRGO or PAHC or NKTR or LH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Labcorp Holdings Inc.
(LH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 1. 1% yield, +147. 0% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LH: +147. 0%, NKTR: -59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPK and PRGO and PAHC and NKTR and LH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OPK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PAHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO, PAHC, LH pay a dividend while OPK, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.