Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OPTT vs WAVE vs NRGV vs HYAC vs AMRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Renewable Utilities
Shell Companies
Engineering & Construction
OPTT vs WAVE vs NRGV vs HYAC vs AMRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Shell Companies | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $69M | $48M | $716M | $318M | $1.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $168K | $217M | $197M | $1.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $-3M | $-115M | $15M | $31M |
| Gross Margin | -56.4% | 75.0% | 22.1% | 70.5% | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | -9.8% | -15.3% | -35.8% | -0.5% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 28.3x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $1M | $95M | $400K | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $6M | $58M | $101K | $72M |
OPTT vs WAVE vs NRGV vs HYAC vs AMRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ocean Power Technol… (OPTT) | 100 | 90.2 | -9.8% |
| Eco Wave Power Glob… (WAVE) | 100 | 288.1 | +188.1% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 162.4 | +62.4% |
| Haymaker Acquisitio… (HYAC) | 100 | 113.5 | +13.5% |
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 77.0 | -23.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPTT vs WAVE vs NRGV vs HYAC vs AMRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPTT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WAVE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.25, current ratio 2.49x
NRGV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs HYAC's -145.0%
- +447.1% vs OPTT's -25.8%
HYAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.03
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.36x
- 5.7% margin vs WAVE's -17.6%
- Beta 0.03 vs NRGV's 3.08, lower leverage
AMRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs HYAC's 5.7%
- Lower P/E (25.0x vs 28.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs HYAC's -145.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 28.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs WAVE's -17.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs NRGV's 3.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs OPTT's -25.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.9% ROA vs OPTT's -97.4%, ROIC -0.3% vs -80.3% |
OPTT vs WAVE vs NRGV vs HYAC vs AMRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OPTT vs WAVE vs NRGV vs HYAC vs AMRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HYAC leads in 3 of 6 categories
WAVE leads 1 • OPTT leads 0 • NRGV leads 0 • AMRC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HYAC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 11790.2x WAVE's $168,000. HYAC is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAVE's -17.6%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $168,000 | $217M | $197M | $2.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$2M | -$72M | $8M | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | -$3M | -$115M | $15M | $31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $0 | -$98M | $29M | -$251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -56.4% | +75.0% | +22.1% | +70.5% | +15.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | -15.3% | -35.8% | -0.5% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | -17.6% | -53.0% | +5.7% | +1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -86.2% | -45.2% | -0.2% | -12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.8% | — | +156.4% | — | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | -177.8% | -42.9% | +115.6% | -2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WAVE and HYAC and AMRC each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.3x trailing earnings, HYAC trades at a 21% valuation discount to AMRC's 35.8x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $69M | $48M | $716M | $318M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64M | $43M | $752M | $318M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.07x | -12.83x | -6.37x | 28.29x | 35.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 25.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 15.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.70x | 1254.97x | 3.52x | 1.61x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 8.74x | 7.50x | 1.32x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HYAC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HYAC delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-154 for OPTT. HYAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HYAC scores 6/9 vs WAVE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -154.5% | -40.9% | -146.8% | +4.8% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.4% | -30.7% | -40.3% | +13.9% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -80.3% | -2.1% | -49.5% | -0.3% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -88.8% | -46.1% | -53.7% | -0.4% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.24x | 1.07x | 0.00x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$5M | $36M | $298,874 | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $6M | $58M | $101,126 | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $1M | $95M | $400,000 | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.11x | -48.45x | -10.33x | -0.47x | 1.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HYAC five years ago would be worth $10,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,536 for OPTT. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs OPTT's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAVE at 45.4% vs OPTT's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.9% | +36.4% | -15.3% | -5.7% | -3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.8% | +35.0% | +447.1% | -2.7% | +134.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.6% | +207.5% | +140.7% | +5.7% | -29.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | -56.3% | -57.7% | +5.7% | -44.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -56.3% | -57.1% | +5.7% | +542.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | +45.4% | +34.0% | +1.9% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
HYAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HYAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HYAC currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs OPTT's 39.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.99x | 1.25x | 3.08x | 0.03x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.90 | $9.87 | $6.35 | $12.54 | $44.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $4.41 | $0.65 | $9.67 | $12.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.1% | +83.2% | +65.2% | +85.7% | +66.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 67.5 | 53.3 | 15.2 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 15K | 3.7M | 245K | 507K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", HYAC as "Buy", AMRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for AMRC (target: $43) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $2.75 | — | $43.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 7 | 2 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HYAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAVE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OPTT vs WAVE vs NRGV vs HYAC vs AMRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III (HYAC) offers the better valuation at 28. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC?
On trailing P/E, Haymaker Acquisition Corp.
III (HYAC) is the cheapest at 28. 3x versus Ameresco, Inc. at 35. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC?
Over the past 5 years, Haymaker Acquisition Corp.
III (HYAC) delivered a total return of +5. 7%, compared to -84. 6% for Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (OPTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +542. 4% versus OPTT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Haymaker Acquisition Corp.
III (HYAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately 10486% more volatile than HYAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III (HYAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III grew EPS 137. 5% year-over-year, compared to -73. 0% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ). Over a 3-year CAGR, OPTT leads at 49. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC?
Haymaker Acquisition Corp.
III (HYAC) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -97. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMRC leads at 6. 5% versus -84. 2% for WAVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HYAC leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMRC: 45.
5% to $43. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OPTT or WAVE or NRGV or HYAC or AMRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Haymaker Acquisition Corp.
III (HYAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03)). Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (OPTT) carries a higher beta of 2. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HYAC: +5. 7%, OPTT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPTT and WAVE and NRGV and HYAC and AMRC?
These companies operate in different sectors (OPTT (Industrials) and WAVE (Utilities) and NRGV (Utilities) and HYAC (Financial Services) and AMRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OPTT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WAVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; HYAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.