Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OPXS vs TDY vs HII vs KTOS vs GD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
OPXS vs TDY vs HII vs KTOS vs GD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $71M | $28.78B | $12.45B | $10.86B | $93.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $6.27B | $12.85B | $1.42B | $53.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $950M | $605M | $29M | $4.34B |
| Gross Margin | 19.0% | 37.7% | 12.4% | 18.3% | 15.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 19.1% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 25.8x | 18.2x | 76.4x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.64B | $3.15B | $180M | $9.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $352M | $774M | $561M | $2.33B |
OPXS vs TDY vs HII vs KTOS vs GD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optex Systems Holdi… (OPXS) | 100 | 582.9 | +482.9% |
| Teledyne Technologi… (TDY) | 100 | 166.1 | +66.1% |
| Huntington Ingalls … (HII) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 312.1 | +212.1% |
| General Dynamics Co… (GD) | 100 | 236.0 | +136.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPXS vs TDY vs HII vs KTOS vs GD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPXS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.85, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.64x
- PEG 0.35 vs GD's 2.96
- 21.6% revenue growth vs TDY's 7.9%
TDY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 15.1% margin vs OPXS's -0.7%
HII is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 1.7%
- Beta 0.62, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.13x
- 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs GD's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs OPXS's 382.6%
- +69.2% vs TDY's +28.9%
GD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and efficiency is your priority.
- Beta 0.54 vs KTOS's 1.87
- 7.5% ROA vs OPXS's -0.1%, ROIC 12.5% vs 26.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% revenue growth vs TDY's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 20.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 2.96 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs OPXS's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs KTOS's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs GD's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.2% vs TDY's +28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs OPXS's -0.1%, ROIC 12.5% vs 26.1% |
OPXS vs TDY vs HII vs KTOS vs GD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OPXS vs TDY vs HII vs KTOS vs GD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OPXS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDY leads 1 • KTOS leads 1 • GD leads 1 • HII leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GD is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.8B annually — 1217.8x OPXS's $44M. TDY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPXS's -0.7%. On growth, OPXS holds the edge at +491.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $6.3B | $12.8B | $1.4B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $1.5B | $953M | $72M | $6.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $950M | $605M | $29M | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$544M | $1.1B | $1.1B | -$134M | $6.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +37.7% | +12.4% | +18.3% | +15.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +19.1% | +4.9% | +1.8% | +10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +15.1% | +4.7% | +2.1% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +16.9% | +8.2% | -9.5% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +491.4% | +7.6% | +13.4% | +22.6% | +10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +21.6% | 0.0% | +133.3% | +12.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OPXS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.8x trailing earnings, OPXS trades at a 97% valuation discount to KTOS's 445.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OPXS offers better value at 0.35x vs GD's 3.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $28.8B | $12.5B | $10.9B | $93.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $31.1B | $14.8B | $10.5B | $101.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.78x | 32.91x | 20.55x | 445.31x | 22.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.78x | 18.22x | 76.41x | 20.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | 2.69x | — | — | 3.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.66x | 20.91x | 15.82x | 120.40x | 16.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.71x | 4.71x | 1.00x | 8.06x | 1.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 2.80x | 2.45x | 5.02x | 3.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.01x | 26.80x | 15.69x | — | 23.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPXS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GD delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-0 for OPXS. OPXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HII's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HII scores 9/9 vs KTOS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +8.9% | +12.0% | +1.3% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +6.2% | +4.9% | +1.0% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.1% | +7.0% | +6.2% | +1.4% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.0% | +8.7% | +6.4% | +1.5% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.25x | 0.62x | 0.09x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $2.3B | $2.4B | -$381M | $7.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $352M | $774M | $561M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.6B | $3.1B | $180M | $9.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 24.51x | 8.86x | 6.16x | 18.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OPXS five years ago would be worth $64,557 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,384 for TDY. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +69.2% total return vs TDY's +28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 63.6% vs TDY's 14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.1% | +19.8% | -9.2% | -27.0% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.2% | +28.9% | +38.1% | +69.2% | +29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +248.7% | +50.3% | +71.0% | +338.2% | +72.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +545.6% | +43.8% | +55.7% | +125.0% | +92.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +382.6% | +563.4% | +131.7% | +1252.6% | +174.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.6% | +14.5% | +19.6% | +63.6% | +20.0% |
Risk & Volatility
GD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GD is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTOS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GD currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 0.93x | 0.62x | 1.87x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.76 | $693.38 | $460.00 | $134.00 | $369.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.56 | $480.61 | $215.05 | $32.85 | $267.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.4% | +89.6% | +68.8% | +43.2% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 46.1 | 20.9 | 33.8 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 303K | 479K | 4.4M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
HII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDY as "Buy", HII as "Hold", KTOS as "Buy", GD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.3% upside for KTOS (target: $110) vs 14.7% for TDY (target: $713). For income investors, HII offers the higher dividend yield at 1.71% vs GD's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $713.00 | $420.00 | $109.58 | $408.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 27 | 24 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 13 | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.42 | — | $5.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
OPXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TDY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
OPXS vs TDY vs HII vs KTOS vs GD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Optex Systems Holdings, Inc (OPXS) is the stronger pick with 21.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY). Optex Systems Holdings, Inc (OPXS) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD?
On trailing P/E, Optex Systems Holdings, Inc (OPXS) is the cheapest at 13.
8x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 445. 3x. On forward P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teledyne Technologies Incorporated wins at 2. 11x versus General Dynamics Corporation's 2. 96x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD?
Over the past 5 years, Optex Systems Holdings, Inc (OPXS) delivered a total return of +545.
6%, compared to +43. 8% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1253% versus HII's +131. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KTOS is approximately 246% more volatile than GD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Optex Systems Holdings, Inc (OPXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 62% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Optex Systems Holdings, Inc (OPXS) is pulling ahead at 21.
6% versus 7. 9% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Optex Systems Holdings, Inc grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to 9. 7% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPXS leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD?
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDY leads at 18. 8% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDY leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 11x versus General Dynamics Corporation's 2. 96x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 76. 4x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 58. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 89. 3% to $109. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD?
In this comparison, HII (1.
7% yield), GD (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. OPXS, TDY, KTOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPXS or TDY or HII or KTOS or GD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 1. 7% yield, +174. 7% 10Y return). Optex Systems Holdings, Inc (OPXS) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GD: +174. 7%, OPXS: +382. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPXS and TDY and HII and KTOS and GD?
These companies operate in different sectors (OPXS (Industrials) and TDY (Technology) and HII (Industrials) and KTOS (Industrials) and GD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OPXS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HII is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HII, GD pay a dividend while OPXS, TDY, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.