Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ORGO vs MDXG vs NVCR vs TELA vs APOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Construction
ORGO vs MDXG vs NVCR vs TELA vs APOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Construction |
| Market Cap | $325M | $544M | $1.88B | $40M | $784M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $564M | $389M | $674M | $77M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $31M | $-173M | $-39M | $54M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 81.0% | 75.2% | 67.2% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 10.2% | -27.2% | -46.0% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.1x | 292.8x | — | — | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $82M | $23M | $290M | $43M | $286M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94M | $166M | $103M | $53M | $40M |
ORGO vs MDXG vs NVCR vs TELA vs APOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organogenesis Holdi… (ORGO) | 100 | 62.0 | -38.0% |
| MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) | 100 | 101.9 | +1.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
| TELA Bio, Inc. (TELA) | 100 | 7.2 | -92.8% |
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 176.4 | +76.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORGO vs MDXG vs NVCR vs TELA vs APOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORGO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.
- 10.1% margin vs TELA's -50.6%
- 3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs APOG's 2.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MDXG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.32x
- 20.0% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2%
- 9.7% ROA vs TELA's -53.1%, ROIC 42.3% vs -151.6%
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TELA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 34.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 5.01x
- Beta 0.57 vs NVCR's 2.20
- +2.6% vs ORGO's -50.8%
APOG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- 9.1% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 31.0%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs TELA's -50.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs NVCR's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs APOG's 2.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.6% vs ORGO's -50.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs TELA's -53.1%, ROIC 42.3% vs -151.6% |
ORGO vs MDXG vs NVCR vs TELA vs APOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ORGO vs MDXG vs NVCR vs TELA vs APOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDXG leads in 2 of 6 categories
ORGO leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • TELA leads 0 • APOG leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 18.2x TELA's $77M. ORGO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TELA's -50.6%. On growth, ORGO holds the edge at +78.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $564M | $389M | $674M | $77M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $53M | -$165M | -$34M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | $31M | -$173M | -$39M | $54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $66M | -$48M | -$32M | $95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +81.0% | +75.2% | +67.2% | +22.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +10.2% | -27.2% | -46.0% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +7.9% | -25.7% | -50.6% | +3.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +17.0% | -7.1% | -40.9% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.1% | -33.1% | +12.3% | +9.1% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | -2.4% | -100.0% | +54.8% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MDXG and APOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 33% valuation discount to ORGO's 17.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APOG's 21.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $325M | $544M | $1.9B | $40M | $784M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $400M | $2.1B | $30M | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.07x | 11.44x | -13.52x | -0.74x | 14.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 292.80x | — | — | 10.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.01x | 5.08x | — | — | 21.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 1.30x | 2.86x | 0.58x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 2.14x | 5.40x | 0.99x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.45x | — | — | 8.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORGO delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TELA. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TELA's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APOG scores 7/9 vs ORGO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +12.9% | -50.8% | -2.7% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | +9.7% | -16.5% | -53.1% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +42.3% | -16.4% | -151.6% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +25.7% | -28.9% | -51.4% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.09x | 0.85x | 1.51x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$144M | $187M | -$10M | $247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94M | $166M | $103M | $53M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82M | $23M | $290M | $43M | $286M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.24x | 25.32x | -96.80x | -6.99x | 5.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ORGO and NVCR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APOG five years ago would be worth $11,332 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $744 for TELA. Over the past 12 months, TELA leads with a +2.6% total return vs ORGO's -50.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORGO at 6.0% vs TELA's -53.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.8% | -43.5% | +25.7% | -13.2% | -1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.8% | -44.6% | +1.0% | +2.6% | -5.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | -37.1% | -76.2% | -90.0% | -0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -62.3% | -91.5% | -92.6% | +13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.7% | -48.4% | +31.0% | -92.6% | +9.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | -14.3% | -38.1% | -53.6% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and TELA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TELA is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 82.2% from its 52-week high vs ORGO's 36.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.22x | 2.20x | 0.57x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.08 | $7.99 | $20.06 | $2.20 | $49.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.21 | $3.02 | $9.82 | $0.50 | $30.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.2% | +45.8% | +82.2% | +45.0% | +72.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 48.7 | 67.5 | 75.7 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.4M | 1.6M | 186K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ORGO and APOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ORGO as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", APOG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 251.6% upside for ORGO (target: $9) vs 93.5% for APOG (target: $71). For income investors, ORGO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.41% vs APOG's 2.84%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $10.00 | $33.50 | — | $70.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 15 | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | — | — | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — | — | — | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.9% |
MDXG leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
ORGO vs MDXG vs NVCR vs TELA vs APOG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (292. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Organogenesis Holdings Inc. (ORGO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG?
On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Organogenesis Holdings Inc. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG?
Over the past 5 years, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) delivered a total return of +13. 3%, compared to -92. 6% for TELA Bio, Inc. (TELA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +31. 0% versus TELA's -92. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TELA Bio, Inc.
(TELA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 287% more volatile than TELA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 151% for TELA Bio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Organogenesis Holdings Inc. grew EPS 1600% year-over-year, compared to -35. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TELA leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG?
MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -54. 6% for TELA Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDXG leads at 15. 3% versus -49. 2% for TELA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 292. 8x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 282. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORGO: 251. 6% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG?
In this comparison, ORGO (3.
4% yield), APOG (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MDXG, NVCR, TELA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORGO or MDXG or NVCR or TELA or APOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TELA Bio, Inc.
(TELA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TELA: -92. 6%, NVCR: +31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORGO and MDXG and NVCR and TELA and APOG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ORGO (Healthcare) and MDXG (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and TELA (Healthcare) and APOG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ORGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TELA is a small-cap high-growth stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock. ORGO, APOG pay a dividend while MDXG, NVCR, TELA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.