Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ORKT vs CLPS vs APPS vs CODA vs MGNI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ORKT
Orangekloud Technology Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-94.9%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.+7.2%
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$477M
5Y Perf.+69.7%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+54.5%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.-2.8%

ORKT vs CLPS vs APPS vs CODA vs MGNI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ORKT logoORKT
CLPS logoCLPS
APPS logoAPPS
CODA logoCODA
MGNI logoMGNI
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - ApplicationAerospace & DefenseAdvertising Agencies
Market Cap$5M$25M$477M$134M$2.01B
Revenue (TTM)$10M$299M$532M$28M$723M
Net Income (TTM)$-10M$-4M$-42M$4M$159M
Gross Margin38.7%22.8%60.1%66.3%63.4%
Operating Margin-99.1%-1.4%0.1%17.4%14.8%
Forward P/E10.1x22.5x13.4x
Total Debt$504K$34M$418M$395K$279M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$28M$40M$29M$553M

ORKT vs CLPS vs APPS vs CODA vs MGNILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ORKT
CLPS
APPS
CODA
MGNI
StockJul 24May 26Return
Orangekloud Technol… (ORKT)1005.1-94.9%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)100107.2+7.2%
Digital Turbine, In… (APPS)100169.7+69.7%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100154.5+54.5%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)10097.2-2.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ORKT vs CLPS vs APPS vs CODA vs MGNI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CODA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. APPS and MGNI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ORKT
Orangekloud Technology Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ORKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27 vs APPS's 1.72, lower leverage
  • 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.
The Value Play

APPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (10.1x vs 22.5x)
Best for: value
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
  • 8.4% 10Y total return vs MGNI's -4.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
  • Beta 1.00, current ratio 8.86x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

MGNI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 22.0% margin vs ORKT's -98.3%
Best for: quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCODA logoCODA30.7% revenue growth vs ORKT's -33.6%
ValueAPPS logoAPPSLower P/E (10.1x vs 22.5x)
Quality / MarginsMGNI logoMGNI22.0% margin vs ORKT's -98.3%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs APPS's 1.72, lower leverage
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+78.9% vs ORKT's -36.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CODA logoCODA6.6% ROA vs ORKT's -62.1%, ROIC 11.2% vs -167.1%

ORKT vs CLPS vs APPS vs CODA vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ORKTOrangekloud Technology Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
APPSDigital Turbine, Inc.
FY 2022
On Device Media
100.0%$503M
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ORKT vs CLPS vs APPS vs CODA vs MGNI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGMGNI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MGNI is the larger business by revenue, generating $723M annually — 71.3x ORKT's $10M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ORKT's -98.3%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAPPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$299M$532M$28M$723M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M-$1M$70M$6M$145M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10M-$4M-$42M$4M$159M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M$0$19M$7M$44M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.7%+22.8%+60.1%+66.3%+63.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-99.1%-1.4%+0.1%+17.4%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-98.3%-1.3%-7.9%+14.8%+22.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.1%-2.3%+3.5%+24.6%+6.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-39.1%+15.3%+12.4%+28.8%+5.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-15.0%+75.8%+113.6%+3.0%+142.9%
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CLPS and APPS and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 54% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPS's 29.7x.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAPPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5M$25M$477M$134M$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$694,871$31M$855M$106M$1.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.78x-3.48x-4.48x32.16x14.74x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.10x22.45x13.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.66x17.85x11.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.68x0.15x0.97x5.05x2.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.50x0.43x2.69x2.30x2.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.20x12.11x
Evenly matched — CLPS and APPS and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-73 for ORKT. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APPS's 2.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAPPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-73.4%-6.1%-21.5%+7.2%+18.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-62.1%-3.2%-4.9%+6.6%+5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-167.1%-7.9%-7.4%+11.2%+9.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-105.9%-9.8%-8.9%+8.1%+7.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932476
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.59x2.72x0.01x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M$6M$378M-$28M-$275M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$28M$40M$29M$553M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$503,579$34M$418M$394,932$279M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-533.17x-1.83x4.03x
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $469 for ORKT. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs ORKT's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs ORKT's -63.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAPPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+48.4%-10.3%-16.5%+25.1%-12.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.7%-5.4%+10.5%+78.9%+12.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%+0.5%-66.5%+34.5%+58.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%-69.3%-93.9%+49.7%-60.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%-78.5%+353.4%+844.4%-4.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-63.9%+0.2%-30.6%+10.4%+16.7%
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APPS's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs ORKT's 30.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAPPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.56x0.27x1.61x1.00x1.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.55$1.88$8.28$17.28$26.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.62$0.80$2.74$5.98$10.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.1%+48.2%+48.2%+68.9%+52.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.649.862.948.655.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded114K15K2.1M256K2.1M
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: APPS as "Hold", CODA as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 150.6% upside for APPS (target: $10) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAPPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$14.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11131
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises130
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.3%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ORKT vs CLPS vs APPS vs CODA vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 6% for Orangekloud Technology Inc. (ORKT). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI?

On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Digital Turbine, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI?

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -95. 3% for Orangekloud Technology Inc. (ORKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus ORKT's -95. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Digital Turbine, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning APPS is approximately 494% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -33. 6% for Orangekloud Technology Inc. (ORKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -565. 4% for Orangekloud Technology Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGNI leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI?

Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -213. 9% for Orangekloud Technology Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -214. 9% for ORKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Digital Turbine, Inc.

(APPS) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APPS: 150. 6% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. ORKT, APPS, CODA, MGNI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ORKT or CLPS or APPS or CODA or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). Orangekloud Technology Inc. (ORKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, ORKT: -95. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ORKT and CLPS and APPS and CODA and MGNI?

These companies operate in different sectors (ORKT (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and APPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ORKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; APPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. CLPS pays a dividend while ORKT, APPS, CODA, MGNI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ORKT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APPS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGNI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ORKT and CLPS and APPS and CODA and MGNI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ORKT: -39.1% · CLPS: 15.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.