Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.41B
5Y Perf.-22.4%
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.73B
5Y Perf.-16.8%
CNC
Centene Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$27.13B
5Y Perf.-14.0%
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.44B
5Y Perf.-62.7%
HUM
Humana Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.67B
5Y Perf.-41.1%

OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OSCR logoOSCR
ALHC logoALHC
CNC logoCNC
CLOV logoCLOV
HUM logoHUM
IndustryMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare Plans
Market Cap$5.41B$3.73B$27.13B$1.44B$29.67B
Revenue (TTM)$13.30B$4.26B$198.10B$2.21B$137.20B
Net Income (TTM)$-39M$20M$-6.44B$-57M$1.13B
Gross Margin17.4%9.0%14.9%42.5%14.0%
Operating Margin0.1%0.8%-3.7%-2.6%1.0%
Forward P/E34.7x140.9x16.3x65.9x27.7x
Total Debt$430M$338M$18.78B$0.00$12.94B
Cash & Equiv.$2.77B$578M$17.89B$78M$4.20B

OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OSCR
ALHC
CNC
CLOV
HUM
StockMar 21May 26Return
Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR)10077.6-22.4%
Alignment Healthcar… (ALHC)10083.2-16.8%
Centene Corporation (CNC)10086.0-14.0%
Clover Health Inves… (CLOV)10037.3-62.7%
Humana Inc. (HUM)10058.9-41.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HUM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Centene Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. OSCR and ALHC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

OSCR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +22.6% vs CLOV's -25.2%
Best for: momentum
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ALHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 46.1%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.2%
  • 46.1% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1%
Best for: growth exposure
CNC
Centene Corporation
The Insurance Pick

CNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39
  • 81.2% 10Y total return vs OSCR's -40.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 93.6%, current ratio 1.68x
  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.68x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
The Insurance Play

Among these 5 stocks, CLOV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
HUM
Humana Inc.
The Insurance Pick

HUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • Combined ratio 1.0 vs CLOV's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
  • 1.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 2.2% ROA vs CLOV's -9.6%, ROIC 4.1% vs -34.0%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALHC logoALHC46.1% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1%
ValueCNC logoCNCLower P/E (16.3x vs 27.7x)
Quality / MarginsHUM logoHUMCombined ratio 1.0 vs CLOV's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyCNC logoCNCBeta 0.39 vs OSCR's 1.84
DividendsHUM logoHUM1.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OSCR logoOSCR+22.6% vs CLOV's -25.2%
Efficiency (ROA)HUM logoHUM2.2% ROA vs CLOV's -9.6%, ROIC 4.1% vs -34.0%

OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OSCROscar Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALHCAlignment Healthcare, Inc.
FY 2023
Health Care, Premium
92.6%$1.7B
Health Care Capitation
7.4%$133M
CNCCentene Corporation
FY 2025
Medicaid Segment
75.8%$147.6B
Commercial Segment
21.6%$42.0B
Other Operating Segment
2.6%$5.1B
CLOVClover Health Investments, Corp.
FY 2025
Insurance Segment
100.0%$50M
HUMHumana Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Segment
84.7%$124.6B
CenterWell Segment
15.3%$22.5B

OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCNCLAGGINGCLOV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CLOV and HUM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $198.1B annually — 89.6x CLOV's $2.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.8% (HUM) to -3.3% (CNC). On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +62.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13.3B$4.3B$198.1B$2.2B$137.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$40M$66M-$5.9B-$55M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$39M$20M-$6.4B-$57M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.8B$237M$6.3B$55M$1.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+17.4%+9.0%+14.9%+42.5%+14.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.1%+0.8%-3.7%-2.6%+1.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.3%+0.5%-3.3%-2.6%+0.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.0%+5.6%+3.2%+2.5%+0.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+52.6%+33.3%+7.1%+62.0%+23.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+125.0%+2.1%+18.3%-4.6%
Evenly matched — CLOV and HUM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, HUM's 16.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALHC's 77.1x.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5.4B$3.7B$27.1B$1.4B$29.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.1B$3.5B$28.0B$1.4B$38.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-12.35x-4932.43x-4.03x-16.59x25.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.65x140.93x16.29x65.89x27.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple77.12x16.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.46x0.94x0.14x0.75x0.23x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.58x20.16x1.35x4.72x1.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.11x32.95x6.28x79.13x
CNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HUM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALHC delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-29 for CNC. OSCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALHC's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALHC scores 6/9 vs CLOV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.3%+11.5%-28.6%-17.1%+6.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%+1.8%-7.9%-9.6%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.6%-34.0%+4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-25.3%+2.9%-14.6%-24.5%+4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946625
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x1.89x0.94x0.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.3B-$240M$889M-$78M$8.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.8B$578M$17.9B$78M$4.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$430M$338M$18.8B$0$12.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.57x1.27x-9.03x3.08x
HUM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OSCR five years ago would be worth $9,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,271 for CLOV. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +22.6% total return vs CLOV's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.6% vs HUM's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+39.4%-9.7%+31.5%+17.0%-6.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+22.6%+17.6%-12.7%-25.2%-1.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+177.5%+152.4%-19.5%+221.7%-51.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.3%-22.7%-22.0%-67.3%-43.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.0%+5.4%+81.2%-72.4%+59.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+40.5%+36.2%-7.0%+47.6%-21.7%
OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — OSCR and CNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSCR currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs CLOV's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.84x0.75x0.39x1.22x0.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.80$23.87$64.15$3.92$315.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.69$11.63$25.08$1.58$163.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.7%+76.5%+85.7%+71.9%+78.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10078.537.383.569.576.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.5M3.6M5.8M5.6M1.6M
Evenly matched — OSCR and CNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: OSCR as "Hold", ALHC as "Buy", CNC as "Buy", CLOV as "Hold", HUM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.1% upside for ALHC (target: $25) vs -19.7% for OSCR (target: $17). HUM is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…CNC logoCNCCentene Corporati…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…HUM logoHUMHumana Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.75$24.83$51.00$3.33$246.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts111643944
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.56
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.8%+3.8%+0.5%
CNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). HUM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallCentene Corporation (CNC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is the stronger pick with 46. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). Humana Inc. (HUM) offers the better valuation at 25. 1x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alignment Healthcare, Inc. (ALHC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?

On forward P/E, Centene Corporation is actually cheaper at 16.

3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?

Over the past 5 years, Oscar Health, Inc.

(OSCR) delivered a total return of -7. 3%, compared to -67. 3% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNC returned +81. 2% versus CLOV's -72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Centene Corporation (CNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

39β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 369% more volatile than CNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 189% for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is pulling ahead at 46. 1% versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alignment Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?

Humana Inc.

(HUM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -4. 4% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUM leads at 1. 1% versus -4. 4% for CLOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLOV leads at 18. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Centene Corporation (CNC) trades at 16.

3x forward P/E versus 140. 9x for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — 124. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALHC: 36. 1% to $24. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?

In this comparison, HUM (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. OSCR, ALHC, CNC, CLOV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Humana Inc.

(HUM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 1. 4% yield). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUM: +59. 8%, OSCR: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OSCR and ALHC and CNC and CLOV and HUM?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUM pays a dividend while OSCR, ALHC, CNC, CLOV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OSCR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALHC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLOV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 31%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OSCR and ALHC and CNC and CLOV and HUM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OSCR: 52.6% · ALHC: 33.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.