Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $5.41B | $3.73B | $27.13B | $1.44B | $29.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.30B | $4.26B | $198.10B | $2.21B | $137.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $20M | $-6.44B | $-57M | $1.13B |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 9.0% | 14.9% | 42.5% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.8% | -3.7% | -2.6% | 1.0% |
| Forward P/E | 34.7x | 140.9x | 16.3x | 65.9x | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $430M | $338M | $18.78B | $0.00 | $12.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $578M | $17.89B | $78M | $4.20B |
OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Alignment Healthcar… (ALHC) | 100 | 83.2 | -16.8% |
| Centene Corporation (CNC) | 100 | 86.0 | -14.0% |
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
| Humana Inc. (HUM) | 100 | 58.9 | -41.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSCR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +22.6% vs CLOV's -25.2%
ALHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 46.1%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.2%
- 46.1% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1%
CNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39
- 81.2% 10Y total return vs OSCR's -40.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 93.6%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.68x
Among these 5 stocks, CLOV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Combined ratio 1.0 vs CLOV's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
- 1.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 2.2% ROA vs CLOV's -9.6%, ROIC 4.1% vs -34.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.1% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.3x vs 27.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 1.0 vs CLOV's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs OSCR's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.6% vs CLOV's -25.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs CLOV's -9.6%, ROIC 4.1% vs -34.0% |
OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
HUM leads 1 • OSCR leads 1 • ALHC leads 0 • CLOV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CLOV and HUM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $198.1B annually — 89.6x CLOV's $2.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.8% (HUM) to -3.3% (CNC). On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +62.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $4.3B | $198.1B | $2.2B | $137.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $66M | -$5.9B | -$55M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | $20M | -$6.4B | -$57M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.8B | $237M | $6.3B | $55M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +9.0% | +14.9% | +42.5% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +0.8% | -3.7% | -2.6% | +1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +0.5% | -3.3% | -2.6% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +5.6% | +3.2% | +2.5% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.6% | +33.3% | +7.1% | +62.0% | +23.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +125.0% | +2.1% | +18.3% | — | -4.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HUM's 16.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALHC's 77.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $3.7B | $27.1B | $1.4B | $29.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $3.5B | $28.0B | $1.4B | $38.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.35x | -4932.43x | -4.03x | -16.59x | 25.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.65x | 140.93x | 16.29x | 65.89x | 27.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 77.12x | — | — | 16.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.94x | 0.14x | 0.75x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.58x | 20.16x | 1.35x | 4.72x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.11x | 32.95x | 6.28x | — | 79.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALHC delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-29 for CNC. OSCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALHC's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALHC scores 6/9 vs CLOV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | +11.5% | -28.6% | -17.1% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +1.8% | -7.9% | -9.6% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -21.6% | -34.0% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.3% | +2.9% | -14.6% | -24.5% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 1.89x | 0.94x | — | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | -$240M | $889M | -$78M | $8.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $578M | $17.9B | $78M | $4.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $338M | $18.8B | $0 | $12.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.57x | 1.27x | -9.03x | — | 3.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSCR five years ago would be worth $9,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,271 for CLOV. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +22.6% total return vs CLOV's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.6% vs HUM's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | -9.7% | +31.5% | +17.0% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.6% | +17.6% | -12.7% | -25.2% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +177.5% | +152.4% | -19.5% | +221.7% | -51.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -22.7% | -22.0% | -67.3% | -43.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.0% | +5.4% | +81.2% | -72.4% | +59.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.5% | +36.2% | -7.0% | +47.6% | -21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSCR and CNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSCR currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs CLOV's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.75x | 0.39x | 1.22x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.80 | $23.87 | $64.15 | $3.92 | $315.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.69 | $11.63 | $25.08 | $1.58 | $163.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +76.5% | +85.7% | +71.9% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.5 | 37.3 | 83.5 | 69.5 | 76.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.5M | 3.6M | 5.8M | 5.6M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSCR as "Hold", ALHC as "Buy", CNC as "Buy", CLOV as "Hold", HUM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.1% upside for ALHC (target: $25) vs -19.7% for OSCR (target: $17). HUM is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | $24.83 | $51.00 | $3.33 | $246.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 16 | 43 | 9 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +3.8% | +0.5% |
CNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). HUM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
OSCR vs ALHC vs CNC vs CLOV vs HUM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
(ALHC) is the stronger pick with 46. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). Humana Inc. (HUM) offers the better valuation at 25. 1x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alignment Healthcare, Inc. (ALHC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?
On forward P/E, Centene Corporation is actually cheaper at 16.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?
Over the past 5 years, Oscar Health, Inc.
(OSCR) delivered a total return of -7. 3%, compared to -67. 3% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNC returned +81. 2% versus CLOV's -72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Centene Corporation (CNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 369% more volatile than CNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 189% for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
(ALHC) is pulling ahead at 46. 1% versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alignment Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?
Humana Inc.
(HUM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -4. 4% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUM leads at 1. 1% versus -4. 4% for CLOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLOV leads at 18. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Centene Corporation (CNC) trades at 16.
3x forward P/E versus 140. 9x for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — 124. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALHC: 36. 1% to $24. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM?
In this comparison, HUM (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. OSCR, ALHC, CNC, CLOV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OSCR or ALHC or CNC or CLOV or HUM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Humana Inc.
(HUM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 1. 4% yield). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUM: +59. 8%, OSCR: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSCR and ALHC and CNC and CLOV and HUM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUM pays a dividend while OSCR, ALHC, CNC, CLOV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.