Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OSS vs AEIS vs VICR vs ACMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
OSS vs AEIS vs VICR vs ACMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $374M | $13.38B | $11.79B | $3.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $1.91B | $453M | $901M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $191M | $119M | $94M |
| Gross Margin | 76.0% | 38.7% | 57.3% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | -10.6% | 11.2% | 18.1% | 12.1% |
| Forward P/E | 68.6x | 40.4x | 94.3x | 29.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $679M | $13M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $791M | $403M | $766M |
OSS vs AEIS vs VICR vs ACMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| One Stop Systems, I… (OSS) | 100 | 888.2 | +788.2% |
| Advanced Energy Ind… (AEIS) | 100 | 526.6 | +426.6% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 297.0 | +197.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSS vs AEIS vs VICR vs ACMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.37, Low D/E 3.2%, current ratio 9.13x
- 33.0% margin vs AEIS's 10.0%
AEIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 168.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- Beta 2.18, yield 0.1%, current ratio 1.59x
- 21.4% revenue growth vs OSS's -41.1%
- Beta 2.18 vs ACMR's 3.24
VICR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs AEIS's 9.3%
- +5.4% vs ACMR's +195.6%
- 16.6% ROA vs ACMR's 3.9%, ROIC 8.9% vs 7.0%
ACMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.24, yield 0.2%
- PEG 0.84 vs AEIS's 21.57
- Lower P/E (29.7x vs 40.4x), PEG 0.84 vs 21.57
- 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AEIS's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs OSS's -41.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.7x vs 40.4x), PEG 0.84 vs 21.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.0% margin vs AEIS's 10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.18 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AEIS's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs ACMR's +195.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs ACMR's 3.9%, ROIC 8.9% vs 7.0% |
OSS vs AEIS vs VICR vs ACMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OSS vs AEIS vs VICR vs ACMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 2 • OSS leads 0 • AEIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 95.5x OSS's $20M. OSS is the more profitable business, keeping 33.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEIS's 10.0%. On growth, AEIS holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $1.9B | $453M | $901M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $244M | $103M | $126M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $191M | $119M | $94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $68M | $119M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.0% | +38.7% | +57.3% | +44.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +11.2% | +18.1% | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +10.0% | +26.2% | +10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +3.6% | +26.3% | -7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +26.3% | +11.5% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.8% | +143.1% | +3.4% | -76.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 57% valuation discount to VICR's 100.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs AEIS's 48.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $374M | $13.4B | $11.8B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $344M | $13.3B | $11.4B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 68.64x | 91.65x | 100.13x | 43.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.36x | 94.31x | 29.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 48.97x | 2.23x | 1.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 51.60x | 197.81x | 27.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.61x | 7.44x | 28.91x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.62x | 9.97x | 16.50x | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 106.31x | 98.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for ACMR. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEIS's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEIS scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.3% | +14.3% | +18.7% | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.1% | +7.7% | +16.6% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +12.2% | +8.9% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.9% | +11.1% | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.50x | 0.02x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$112M | -$390M | -$463M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $791M | $403M | $766M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $679M | $13M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -127.34x | 19.62x | — | 20.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OSS and VICR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEIS five years ago would be worth $39,274 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,344 for ACMR. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs ACMR's +195.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSS at 83.7% vs AEIS's 59.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +122.1% | +58.6% | +123.6% | +31.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +526.6% | +220.9% | +535.7% | +195.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +520.1% | +308.8% | +507.9% | +487.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.2% | +292.7% | +201.3% | +133.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | +928.9% | +2704.1% | +3065.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +83.7% | +59.9% | +82.5% | +80.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSS and AEIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEIS is the less volatile stock with a 2.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSS currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs ACMR's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.37x | 2.18x | 2.79x | 3.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.95 | $397.00 | $293.95 | $71.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.33 | $107.29 | $40.27 | $19.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +88.6% | +88.9% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.6 | 49.1 | 68.2 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 650K | 864K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSS as "Buy", AEIS as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -6.3% upside for VICR (target: $245) vs -40.4% for OSS (target: $9). For income investors, ACMR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.19% vs AEIS's 0.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $310.00 | $245.00 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 24 | 7 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 | — | $0.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACMR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
OSS vs AEIS vs VICR vs ACMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -41. 1% for One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus Vicor Corporation at 100. 1x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 's 21. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR?
Over the past 5 years, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) delivered a total return of +292. 7%, compared to +133. 4% for ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus OSS's +209. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 18β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 49% more volatile than AEIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 50% for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus -41. 1% for One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for ACM Research, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus 8. 2% for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -10. 5% for OSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 's 21. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 64. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VICR: -6. 3% to $245. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield), AEIS (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. OSS, VICR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OSS or AEIS or VICR or ACMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+928. 9% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEIS: +928. 9%, VICR: +27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSS and AEIS and VICR and ACMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSS (Technology) and AEIS (Industrials) and VICR (Technology) and ACMR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEIS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.