Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OSW vs REVG vs MNTN vs WNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Advertising Agencies
Agricultural - Machinery
OSW vs REVG vs MNTN vs WNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Agricultural - Machinery | Advertising Agencies | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $2.49B | $3.12B | $724M | $317M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $989M | $2.40B | $299M | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $78M | $108M | $23M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 14.4% | 80.0% | 2.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 7.1% | 13.8% | -3.1% |
| Forward P/E | 21.7x | 17.2x | 8.9x | 1.5x |
| Total Debt | $103M | $56M | $0.00 | $443M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $35M | $210M | $32M |
OSW vs REVG vs MNTN vs WNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneSpaWorld Holding… (OSW) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| REV Group, Inc. (REVG) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
| MNTN Inc. (MNTN) | 100 | 33.9 | -66.1% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSW vs REVG vs MNTN vs WNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 18.9%, current ratio 1.91x
- Beta 1.12, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.91x
- 7.9% margin vs WNC's -4.4%
REVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 174.2% 10Y total return vs OSW's 157.2%
- +80.3% vs MNTN's -65.2%
MNTN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.6%, EPS growth 79.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 28.6% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
WNC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 17.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.6% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 17.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs WNC's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs WNC's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WNC's 4.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.3% vs MNTN's -65.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs WNC's -5.0%, ROIC 10.6% vs 37.4% |
OSW vs REVG vs MNTN vs WNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OSW vs REVG vs MNTN vs WNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MNTN leads in 1 of 6 categories
REVG leads 1 • OSW leads 0 • WNC leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REVG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 8.0x MNTN's $299M. OSW is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNC's -4.4%. On growth, MNTN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $989M | $2.4B | $299M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $193M | $52M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $108M | $23M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $200M | $20M | -$38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +14.4% | +80.0% | +2.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +7.1% | +13.8% | -3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +4.5% | +7.8% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +8.3% | +6.5% | -2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +11.3% | +14.2% | -20.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | +68.6% | +137.9% | -120.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNTN and WNC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 96% valuation discount to OSW's 35.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WNC's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OSW's 22.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $3.1B | $724M | $317M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $3.1B | $514M | $728M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.62x | 33.81x | -105.52x | 1.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.68x | 17.18x | 8.94x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.87x | 14.35x | 15.16x | 1.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 1.27x | 2.50x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.70x | 7.73x | 15.28x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.43x | 16.41x | 12.83x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — REVG and MNTN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WNC. REVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WNC's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs WNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.1% | +27.9% | +8.3% | -17.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +8.9% | +6.6% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +29.9% | +18.9% | +37.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +27.0% | +12.2% | +32.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.13x | — | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $86M | $21M | -$210M | $411M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $35M | $210M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $103M | $56M | $0 | $443M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.88x | 6.03x | 14.94x | -0.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $36,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,483 for MNTN. Over the past 12 months, REVG leads with a +80.3% total return vs MNTN's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs MNTN's -29.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | +2.6% | -24.7% | -11.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | +80.3% | -65.2% | +0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.5% | +535.6% | -65.2% | -63.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.3% | +261.2% | -65.2% | -48.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.2% | +174.2% | -65.2% | -22.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +85.2% | -29.6% | -28.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSW and MNTN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OSW is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs MNTN's 28.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.48x | 1.17x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $69.92 | $32.49 | $12.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.19 | $34.96 | $7.71 | $7.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +91.4% | +28.3% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 50.6 | 42.2 | 37.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 842K | 1.6M | 644K | 598K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OSW and WNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSW as "Buy", REVG as "Hold", WNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.8% upside for MNTN (target: $21) vs -13.9% for REVG (target: $55). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs REVG's 0.40%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $55.00 | $20.64 | $8.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 12 | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.4% | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $0.26 | — | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +3.5% | +1.4% | +10.6% |
MNTN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). REVG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
OSW vs REVG vs MNTN vs WNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, MNTN Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC?
Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -65. 2% for MNTN Inc. (MNTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REVG returned +174. 2% versus MNTN's -67. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 85β — meaning WNC is approximately 58% more volatile than MNTN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 120% for Wabash National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -60. 0% for REV Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTN leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus -2. 2% for MNTN Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus 7. 8% for REVG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTN leads at 76. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNTN: 124. 8% to $20. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), OSW (0. 7% yield), REVG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. MNTN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OSW or REVG or MNTN or WNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
17), 0. 7% yield, +159. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OSW: +159. 6%, REVG: +174. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSW and REVG and MNTN and WNC?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSW (Consumer Cyclical) and REVG (Industrials) and MNTN (Communication Services) and WNC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNTN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock. OSW, WNC pay a dividend while REVG, MNTN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.