Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OTLK vs REPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
OTLK vs REPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $14M | $266M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | -5.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -286.8% | — |
| Total Debt | $247.70B | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8.08T | $111M |
OTLK vs REPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outlook Therapeutic… (OTLK) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| Replimune Group, In… (REPL) | 100 | 21.7 | -78.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OTLK vs REPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OTLK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.8%, EPS growth 55.9%
- 20.8% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
- -0.0% ROA vs REPL's -94.4%
REPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.83
- -78.0% 10Y total return vs OTLK's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 18.3%, current ratio 7.95x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.8% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs OTLK's -500.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs OTLK's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -53.4% vs OTLK's -84.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs REPL's -94.4% |
OTLK vs REPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REPL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OTLK and REPL operate at a comparable scale, with $205,535 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $205,535 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$59M | -$323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14.94T | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -286.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -500.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -999999.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -152.8% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
REPL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $266M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$7.84T | $231M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.12x | -1.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.85x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OTLK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OTLK scores 4/9 vs REPL's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -149.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | -94.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -51.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7.84T | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8.08T | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $247.7B | $76M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -182.41x | -48.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REPL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REPL five years ago would be worth $932 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for OTLK. Over the past 12 months, REPL leads with a -53.4% total return vs OTLK's -84.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REPL at -43.0% vs OTLK's -78.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.3% | -62.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.7% | -53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -81.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -90.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -78.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.9% | -43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
REPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OTLK's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REPL currently trades 25.2% from its 52-week high vs OTLK's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.39 | $13.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $1.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.4% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
REPL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OTLK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
OTLK vs REPL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OTLK or REPL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Replimune Group, Inc.
(REPL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OTLK or REPL?
Over the past 5 years, Replimune Group, Inc.
(REPL) delivered a total return of -90. 7%, compared to -99. 5% for Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. (OTLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REPL returned -73. 2% versus OTLK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OTLK or REPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Replimune Group, Inc.
(REPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning OTLK is approximately 83% more volatile than REPL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — OTLK or REPL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Outlook Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 55. 9% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for Replimune Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OTLK or REPL?
Replimune Group, Inc.
(REPL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -44. 2% for Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REPL leads at 0. 0% versus -47. 4% for OTLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OTLK leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OTLK or REPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OTLK or REPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Replimune Group, Inc.
(REPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REPL: -73. 2%, OTLK: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OTLK and REPL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.