OTLY vs BYND

For growth investors, Oatly Group AB (OTLY) is the stronger pick with 4.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Analysts rate Oatly Group AB (OTLY) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Oatly Group AB (OTLY) delivered a total return of -97.

3%, compared to -99. 1% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OTLY returned -97. 3% versus BYND's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oatly Group AB (OTLY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

52β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BYND is approximately 10% more volatile than OTLY relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oatly Group AB (OTLY) is pulling ahead at 4.

7% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oatly Group AB grew EPS 25. 5% year-over-year, compared to 24. 7% for Beyond Meat, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OTLY leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Beyond Meat, Inc.

(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -17. 7% for Oatly Group AB — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OTLY leads at -7. 9% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OTLY leads at 32. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Oatly Group AB (OTLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OTLY: -97. 3%, BYND: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.