Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
OVLY logo
OVLY
WAFD logo
WAFD
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
ICE logo
ICE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OVLY vs WAFD vs JPM vs FIS vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OVLY
Oak Valley Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$294M
5Y Perf.+175.9%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.85B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%

OVLY vs WAFD vs JPM vs FIS vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OVLY logoOVLY
WAFD logoWAFD
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
ICE logoICE
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology ServicesFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$294M$2.85B$896.00B$20.26B$79.60B
Revenue (TTM)$92M$1.39B$280.33B$11.66B$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$243M$57.05B$2.67B$3.30B
Gross Margin88.3%52.8%60.0%37.6%61.9%
Operating Margin33.5%22.4%25.9%17.9%38.7%
Forward P/E12.1x11.4x14.4x6.2x17.3x
Total Debt$8M$1.82B$942.38B$4.01B$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$203M$657M$343.34B$599M$837M

OVLY vs WAFD vs JPM vs FIS vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OVLY
WAFD
JPM
FIS
ICE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY)100275.9+175.9%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100138.1+38.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OVLY vs WAFD vs JPM vs FIS vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS and ICE are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. OVLY also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OVLY
Oak Valley Bancorp
The Banking Pick

OVLY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 3.7%, current ratio 148.25x
  • Beta 0.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 148.25x
  • NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • +35.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
Best for: income & stability
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs OVLY's 303.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs WAFD's 3.69
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 17.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.95
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8%
  • 7.5% ROA vs WAFD's 0.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.9%
Best for: valuation efficiency
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
  • 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs OVLY's -8.6%
  • 26.1% margin vs WAFD's 17.5%
  • Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthICE logoICE7.5% NII/revenue growth vs OVLY's -8.6%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 17.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.95
Quality / MarginsICE logoICE26.1% margin vs WAFD's 17.5%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)OVLY logoOVLY+35.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs WAFD's 0.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.9%

OVLY vs WAFD vs JPM vs FIS vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
OVLYOak Valley Bancorp

Segment breakdown not available.

WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

OVLY vs WAFD vs JPM vs FIS vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOVLYLAGGINGWAFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3059.6x OVLY's $92M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 17.5%.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$92M$1.4B$280.3B$11.7B$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$277M$81.4B$4.1B$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$243M$57.0B$2.7B$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$25M$215M$100.9B$2.8B$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+88.3%+52.8%+60.0%+37.6%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.5%+22.4%+25.9%+17.9%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.1%+17.5%+20.4%+22.9%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+27.0%+15.5%+36.0%+23.9%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.1%+46.3%+16.0%+30.6%+23.1%
ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, OVLY trades at a 77% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$294M$2.9B$896.0B$20.3B$79.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$99M$4.0B$1.50T$23.7B$99.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.15x14.10x16.00x52.27x24.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.35x14.40x6.24x17.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.07x4.58x0.90x2.14x2.74x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.23x13.41x18.36x6.50x15.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.60x2.02x3.20x1.90x6.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x0.98x2.47x1.46x2.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.99x13.71x8.88x7.21x18.56x
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OVLY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. OVLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.3%+8.0%+15.9%+18.4%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+0.9%+1.3%+7.5%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.5%+3.9%+4.5%+6.0%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.7%+5.7%+8.9%+6.6%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967569
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.60x2.60x0.29x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$195M$1.2B$599.0B$3.4B$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$203M$657M$343.3B$599M$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$1.8B$942.4B$4.0B$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.30x0.48x0.74x21.16x6.53x
OVLY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, OVLY leads with a +35.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.1%+17.1%-0.5%-38.9%-11.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.1%+32.5%+21.8%-49.4%-20.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.4%+37.6%+138.2%-18.9%+34.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%+29.5%+118.2%-67.3%+30.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+303.2%+91.9%+465.8%-25.6%+195.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.8%+11.2%+33.6%-6.8%+10.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WAFD and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.55x0.66x0.94x0.61x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.85$37.10$337.25$82.74$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.25$26.31$262.71$37.91$136.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.6%+99.9%+95.1%+47.4%+74.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.063.859.130.831.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded48K525K7.0M5.6M3.2M
Evenly matched — WAFD and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WAFD and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WAFD as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs ICE's 1.38%.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$339.75$62.88$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11613736
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+2.8%+1.9%+4.2%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111615113
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.61$1.05$5.95$1.63$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.6%+3.9%+7.0%+1.7%
Evenly matched — WAFD and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallOak Valley Bancorp (OVLY)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OVLY vs WAFD vs JPM vs FIS vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 6% for Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY). Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE?

On trailing P/E, Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 168% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -8. 6% for Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE?

Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVLY leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is OVLY or WAFD or JPM or FIS or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OVLY and WAFD and JPM and FIS and ICE?

These companies operate in different sectors (OVLY (Financial Services) and WAFD (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OVLY is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.