Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FANG | 36.3% revenue growth vs OVV's -4.5% |
| Value | OVV | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 17.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | OVV | 14.1% net margin vs FANG's 11.1% |
| Stability / Safety | FANG | Beta 1.14 vs OVV's 1.42, lower leverage |
| Dividends | OVV | 2.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | OVV | +19.2% vs FANG's +12.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OVV | 6.1% ROA vs FANG's 2.3%, ROIC 8.0% vs 6.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Ovintiv is an independent North American energy company that explores for, develops, and produces natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids. It generates revenue primarily from selling hydrocarbons produced from its core assets — roughly 60% from the Permian and Anadarko basins in the U.S. and 40% from Canadian operations like the Montney formation. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large, low-cost resource base across premier North American basins and its operational scale, which drives capital efficiency.
Diamondback Energy is an independent oil and natural gas company focused on unconventional resource development in the Permian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from crude oil production — roughly 70% of total revenue — with natural gas and natural gas liquids making up the remainder. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large, contiguous acreage position in the Permian's most productive formations, which enables efficient, low-cost development through scale and operational expertise.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
OVV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). FANG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.0B annually — 1.7x OVV's $8.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.1% (OVV) to 11.1% (FANG). On growth, OVV holds the edge at -5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OVVOvintiv Inc. | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.8B | $15.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | $10.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.6B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +35.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +32.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | -8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.8% | -2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, OVV trades at a 65% valuation discount to FANG's 30.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OVV's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.4x.
| Metric | OVVOvintiv Inc. | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.8B | $49.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.3B | $63.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.58x | 30.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.97x | 17.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 6.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.47x | 3.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.51x | 9.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OVV delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for FANG. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OVV's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OVV scores 6/9 vs FANG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OVVOvintiv Inc. | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.1% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.5B | $14.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.06x | 8.68x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $27,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,658 for OVV. Over the past 12 months, OVV leads with a +19.2% total return vs FANG's +12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 11.4% vs OVV's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OVVOvintiv Inc. | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.9% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.2% | +12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +38.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.6% | +178.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.7% | +191.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FANG is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OVV's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | OVVOvintiv Inc. | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.60 | $177.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.80 | $114.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OVV as "Buy" and FANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.7% upside for FANG (target: $184) vs 3.1% for OVV (target: $52). For income investors, OVV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.34% vs FANG's 2.30%.
| Metric | OVVOvintiv Inc. | FANGDiamondback Energ… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.14 | $184.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +4.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) | 100 | 371.65 | +271.7% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 255.29 | +155.3% |
Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) returned +178% over 5 years vs Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)'s +127%. A $10,000 investment in FANG 5 years ago would be worth $27,840 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) | $2.9B | $8.7B | +199.4% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | $527M | $15.0B | +2750.7% |
Ovintiv Inc.'s revenue grew from $2.9B (2016) to $8.7B (2025) — a 13.0% CAGR. Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s revenue grew from $527M (2016) to $15.0B (2025) — a 45.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) | -32.4% | 14.2% | +143.9% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | -31.3% | 11.1% | +135.4% |
Ovintiv Inc.'s net margin went from -32% (2016) to 14% (2025). Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s net margin went from -31% (2016) to 11% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) | 15.7 | 8.2 | -47.8% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 25.6 | 26.2 | +2.3% |
Ovintiv Inc. has traded in a 4x–26x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~11x. Diamondback Energy, Inc. has traded in a 6x–64x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~30x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) | -5.35 | 4.78 | +189.3% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | -2.2 | 5.73 | +360.5% |
Ovintiv Inc.'s EPS grew from $-5.35 (2016) to $4.78 (2025). Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-2.20 (2016) to $5.73 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Ovintiv Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2025 (-7% vs 2021). Diamondback Energy, Inc. generated $5B FCF in 2025 (+213% vs 2021).
OVV vs FANG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OVV or FANG a better buy right now?
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) offers the better valuation at 10.6x trailing P/E (12.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OVV or FANG?
On trailing P/E, Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) is the cheapest at 10.6x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 30.4x. On forward P/E, Ovintiv Inc. is actually cheaper at 12.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OVV or FANG?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) delivered a total return of +178.4%, compared to +126.6% for Ovintiv Inc. (OVV). A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth approximately $28K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FANG returned +191.4% versus OVV's +166.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OVV or FANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.14β versus Ovintiv Inc.'s 1.42β — meaning OVV is approximately 25% more volatile than FANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 67% for Ovintiv Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — OVV or FANG?
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) is the more profitable company, earning 14.2% net margin versus 11.1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32.7% versus 21.6% for OVV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FANG leads at 35.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OVV or FANG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) trades at 12.0x forward P/E versus 17.6x for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — 5.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FANG: 5.7% to $184.08.
07Which pays a better dividend — OVV or FANG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) offers the highest yield at 2.3%, versus 2.3% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
08Is OVV or FANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.14), 2.3% yield, +191.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FANG: +191.4%, OVV: +166.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OVV and FANG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: OVV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FANG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.