OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$16.17B
5Y Perf.-9.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OWL vs BX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BX
Blackstone Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$95.85B
5Y Perf.+88.7%
OWL vs BX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OWL | BX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $16.17B | $95.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.87B | $13.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $3.02B |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | 51.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.86B | $13.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $195M | $2.63B |
OWL vs BX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OWL
BX
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Owl Capital In… (OWL) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OWL vs BX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OWL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Blackstone Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
The Banking Pick
OWL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -40.0%
- Beta 1.64, yield 7.9%, current ratio 0.95x
- 25.0% NII/revenue growth vs BX's 21.6%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
BX
Blackstone Inc.
The Banking Pick
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 6.3%
- 476.1% 10Y total return vs OWL's 29.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 60.8%, current ratio 0.91x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OWL | 25.0% NII/revenue growth vs BX's 21.6% |
| Value | OWL | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | OWL | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BX's 0.3% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety | BX | Beta 1.53 vs OWL's 1.64, lower leverage |
| Dividends | OWL | 7.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BX's 6.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BX | -6.5% vs OWL's -37.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OWL | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BX's 0.3% |
OWL vs BX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
OWL vs BX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBXLAGGINGOWL
OWLBlue Owl Capital Inc.
1leads
BXBlackstone Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OWLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BX3/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OWL4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BX7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BX2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.8B annually — 4.8x OWL's $2.9B. BX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OWL's 2.7%.
| Metric | OWLBlue Owl Capital … | BXBlackstone Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $13.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +51.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.7% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +41.3% |
BX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OWL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.5x trailing earnings, BX trades at a 63% valuation discount to OWL's 86.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BX's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OWL's 19.6x.
| Metric | OWLBlue Owl Capital … | BXBlackstone Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.2B | $95.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.8B | $106.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 86.21x | 31.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.68x | 20.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.55x | 14.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.63x | 6.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 4.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.50x | 54.93x |
OWL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $1 for OWL. BX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OWL's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BX scores 5/9 vs OWL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OWLBlue Owl Capital … | BXBlackstone Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $195M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.45x | 14.12x |
BX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BX five years ago would be worth $15,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,241 for OWL. Over the past 12 months, BX leads with a -6.5% total return vs OWL's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BX at 18.4% vs OWL's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OWLBlue Owl Capital … | BXBlackstone Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.0% | -21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.8% | -6.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.7% | +65.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.4% | +59.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.6% | +476.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +18.4% |
BX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BX is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OWL's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BX currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs OWL's 49.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OWLBlue Owl Capital … | BXBlackstone Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.08 | $190.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.96 | $101.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.1% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32.4M | 7.1M |
BX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OWL and BX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OWL as "Buy" and BX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for OWL (target: $16) vs 27.8% for BX (target: $156). For income investors, OWL offers the higher dividend yield at 7.95% vs BX's 6.30%.
| Metric | OWLBlue Owl Capital … | BXBlackstone Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.78 | $156.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.9% | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $7.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.3% |
Evenly matched — OWL and BX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OWL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallBlackstone Inc. (BX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OWL vs BX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OWL or BX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Owl Capital Inc.
(OWL) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 6% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the better valuation at 31. 5x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OWL or BX?
On trailing P/E, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the cheapest at 31. 5x versus Blue Owl Capital Inc. at 86. 2x. On forward P/E, Blue Owl Capital Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OWL or BX?
Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) delivered a total return of +59. 0%, compared to +32. 4% for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BX returned +476. 1% versus OWL's +29. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OWL or BX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus Blue Owl Capital Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning OWL is approximately 7% more volatile than BX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 64% for Blue Owl Capital Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OWL or BX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Owl Capital Inc.
(OWL) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus 21. 6% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -40. 0% for Blue Owl Capital Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OWL or BX?
Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 2. 7% for Blue Owl Capital Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 21. 9% for OWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OWL or BX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Blue Owl Capital Inc.
(OWL) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Blackstone Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OWL: 52. 5% to $15. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — OWL or BX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 6. 3% for Blackstone Inc. (BX).
09Is OWL or BX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6. 3% yield, +476. 1% 10Y return). Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BX: +476. 1%, OWL: +29. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OWL and BX?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OWL: 25.0% · BX: 21.6%)Net Margin>
%
(OWL: 2.7% · BX: 21.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(OWL: 86.2x · BX: 31.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.