Silver
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PAAS vs CDE vs HL vs EXK vs NEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Other Precious Metals
Gold
PAAS vs CDE vs HL vs EXK vs NEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Silver | Gold | Gold | Other Precious Metals | Gold |
| Market Cap | $24.36B | $11.63B | $12.13B | $2.99B | $125.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.02B | $2.57B | $1.57B | $330M | $17.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.27B | $799M | $559M | $-94M | $5.26B |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 35.4% | 50.9% | 9.3% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.9% | 39.4% | 44.1% | -1.7% | 49.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 9.1x | 19.1x | 14.3x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $935M | $365M | $299M | $120M | $474M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.21B | $554M | $242M | $106M | $7.65B |
PAAS vs CDE vs HL vs EXK vs NEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pan American Silver… (PAAS) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 528.6 | +428.6% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAAS vs CDE vs HL vs EXK vs NEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 13.4%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.74 vs CDE's 1.81
- 0.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NEM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
CDE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- PEG 0.17 vs NEM's 0.85
- 96.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x)
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs PAAS's 326.1%
- 35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
- +271.0% vs NEM's +112.0%
- 16.3% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs 1.5%
EXK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NEM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs CDE's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NEM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs NEM's +112.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs 1.5% |
PAAS vs CDE vs HL vs EXK vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PAAS vs CDE vs HL vs EXK vs NEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NEM leads in 2 of 6 categories
CDE leads 1 • HL leads 1 • PAAS leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 52.2x EXK's $330M. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $2.6B | $1.6B | $330M | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $1.2B | $853M | $49M | $12.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $799M | $559M | -$94M | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $915M | $472M | -$129M | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +35.4% | +50.9% | +9.3% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +39.4% | +44.1% | -1.7% | +49.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +31.1% | +35.6% | -28.4% | +30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +35.6% | +30.0% | -39.1% | +75.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.2% | +137.8% | +57.4% | +154.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +134.8% | +4.9% | -160.0% | -97.5% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CDE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.7x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 52% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs NEM's 1.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.4B | $11.6B | $12.1B | $3.0B | $125.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.1B | $11.4B | $12.2B | $3.0B | $118.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.15x | 20.13x | 36.92x | -78.08x | 17.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.39x | 9.10x | 19.07x | 14.34x | 10.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | 0.39x | — | — | 1.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.00x | 11.19x | 17.25x | 76.02x | 9.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.61x | 5.62x | 8.53x | 13.72x | 5.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.16x | 3.56x | 4.58x | 5.07x | 3.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.52x | 17.48x | 39.11x | — | 17.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs EXK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.6% | +15.2% | +22.5% | -18.4% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.0% | +11.2% | +16.3% | -9.2% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.7% | +23.5% | +15.3% | +1.5% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.4% | +23.9% | +16.8% | +1.6% | +20.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.11x | 0.12x | 0.25x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$277M | -$188M | $57M | $14M | -$7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $554M | $242M | $106M | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $935M | $365M | $299M | $120M | $474M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.79x | 47.33x | 19.04x | -39.17x | 50.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,111 for EXK. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs NEM's +112.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 72.6% vs NEM's 34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +3.2% | -4.1% | +12.5% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.5% | +216.1% | +271.0% | +193.4% | +112.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.9% | +414.6% | +194.9% | +144.0% | +142.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.4% | +96.0% | +150.3% | +61.1% | +80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +326.1% | +149.9% | +360.6% | +182.7% | +293.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.9% | +72.6% | +43.4% | +34.6% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAAS and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEM currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.81x | 1.26x | 1.71x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.99 | $27.77 | $34.17 | $15.15 | $134.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.08 | $5.55 | $4.68 | $3.14 | $48.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +65.2% | +52.9% | +67.0% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 49.3 | 46.6 | 47.6 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 22.2M | 15.4M | 9.4M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PAAS and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAAS as "Buy", CDE as "Buy", HL as "Hold", EXK as "Buy", NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 21.2% for NEM (target: $138). For income investors, NEM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.88% vs PAAS's 0.81%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $75.00 | $29.00 | $23.83 | $12.75 | $137.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 21 | 26 | 14 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — | +0.1% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | — | $0.01 | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.1% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
NEM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CDE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PAAS vs CDE vs HL vs EXK vs NEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM?
On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.
7x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 17x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to +61. 1% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus CDE's +149. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 146% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM?
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
1% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 3. 8% for EXK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEM leads at 49. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM?
In this comparison, NEM (0.
9% yield), PAAS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CDE, HL, EXK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PAAS or CDE or HL or EXK or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +326. 1% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +326. 1%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAAS and CDE and HL and EXK and NEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAAS, NEM pay a dividend while CDE, HL, EXK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.