PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Market Cap$10.71B
5Y Perf.+275.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PAC vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$132.71B
5Y Perf.+56.2%
PAC vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PAC | PLD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $10.71B | $132.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.53B | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10.36B | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 54.0% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 41.6x |
| Total Debt | $46.66B | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.45B | $1.32B |
PAC vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PAC
PLD
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (PAC) | 100 | 375.4 | +275.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAC vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PAC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Prologis, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
The Income Pick
PAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, current ratio 0.91x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 265.6% 10Y total return vs PAC's 215.5%
- 36.7% margin vs PAC's 31.9%
- +40.7% vs PAC's +23.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PAC | 21.4% revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% |
| Value | PAC | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 41.6x), PEG 0.03 vs 3.84 |
| Quality / Margins | PLD | 36.7% margin vs PAC's 31.9% |
| Stability / Safety | PAC | Beta 0.59 vs PLD's 0.73 |
| Dividends | PAC | 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PLD | +40.7% vs PAC's +23.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PAC | 11.8% ROA vs PLD's 3.3%, ROIC 21.9% vs 3.8% |
PAC vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
PAC vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPACLAGGINGPLD
PLDPrologis, Inc.
1leads
PACGrupo Aeroportuario d…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PLDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PLD4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PAC5/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PAC6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.5B annually — 3.7x PLD's $8.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 36.7% (PLD) to 31.9% (PAC). On growth, PLD holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32.5B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.3B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10.4B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.9B | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +54.0% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.8% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -24.1% |
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.8x trailing earnings, PAC trades at a 39% valuation discount to PLD's 35.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAC offers better value at 0.55x vs PLD's 3.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.7B | $132.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.8B | $162.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.80x | 35.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.04x | 41.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.55x | 3.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.38x | 23.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.70x | 16.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.78x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.66x | 27.02x |
PAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAC delivers a 41.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $6 for PLD. PLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAC's 1.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAC scores 8/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.7% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.8% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.9% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.5% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.88x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $36.2B | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.5B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46.7B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.99x | 5.27x |
PAC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PAC and PLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAC five years ago would be worth $26,451 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,980 for PLD. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +40.7% total return vs PAC's +23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAC at 15.2% vs PLD's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +40.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.7% | +21.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.5% | +265.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +6.6% |
Evenly matched — PAC and PLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAC and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PAC's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $300.41 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $204.24 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.0% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 3.1M |
Evenly matched — PAC and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PAC and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PAC as "Hold" and PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.3% upside for PAC (target: $260) vs 1.1% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, PAC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs PLD's 2.62%.
| Metric | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $260.00 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $168.40 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Evenly matched — PAC and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PLD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
Best OverallGrupo Aeroportuario del Pac… (PAC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PAC vs PLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAC or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC) offers the better valuation at 21. 8x trailing P/E (1. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prologis, Inc. (PLD) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAC or PLD?
On trailing P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the cheapest at 21. 8x versus Prologis, Inc. at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. wins at 0. 03x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAC or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) delivered a total return of +164. 5%, compared to +39. 8% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +265. 6% versus PAC's +215. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAC or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately 24% more volatile than PAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 188% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAC or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prologis, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAC or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 30. 7% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAC leads at 54. 0% versus 53. 8% for PLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAC leads at 77. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAC or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 03x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 41. 6x for Prologis, Inc. — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAC: 4. 3% to $260. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAC or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 6% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is PAC or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 3. 9% yield, +215. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAC: +215. 5%, PLD: +265. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAC and PLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (PAC (Industrials) and PLD (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PAC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PAC: -63.8% · PLD: 8.7%)Net Margin>
%
(PAC: 31.9% · PLD: 36.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PAC: 21.8x · PLD: 35.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.