Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PACH vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
PACH vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $56K | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-165.00 | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $1.35B |
Quick Verdict: PACH vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.01
- 1.7% 10Y total return vs PSFE's -92.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 0.11x
In this particular matchup, PSFE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PSFE's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.7% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.1% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8% |
PACH vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PACH vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and PACH operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -183.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PACH and PSFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PACH's 9999.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55,990 | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30,898 | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -338.21x | -2.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9999.00x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PACH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSFE scores 4/9 vs PACH's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25,092 | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,092 | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PACH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PACH five years ago would be worth $10,170 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, PACH leads with a +1.7% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PACH at 0.6% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.7% | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | -34.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | -94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.6% | -13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
PACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PACH is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PACH currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.20 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.94 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% |
PACH leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 1 category is tied.
PACH vs PSFE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PACH or PSFE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PACH or PSFE?
Over the past 5 years, Pioneer Acquisition I Corp.
(PACH) delivered a total return of +1. 7%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PACH returned +1. 7% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PACH or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pioneer Acquisition I Corp.
(PACH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 19610% more volatile than PACH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — PACH or PSFE?
Pioneer Acquisition I Corp.
(PACH) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus 0. 0% for PACH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSFE leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — PACH or PSFE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is PACH or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pioneer Acquisition I Corp.
(PACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PACH: +1. 7%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between PACH and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (PACH (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.