Financial - Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PACS vs CCRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
PACS vs CCRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $5.27B | $423M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.29B | $761M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $192M | $-99M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | -0.9% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 133.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.20B | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $109M |
PACS vs CCRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
| Cross Country Healt… (CCRN) | 100 | 74.4 | -25.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PACS vs CCRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PACS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
- Rev growth 29.3%, EPS growth 221.1%
- 46.2% 10Y total return vs CCRN's -10.5%
In this particular matchup, CCRN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.3% NII/revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 133.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs CCRN's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs CCRN's 0.78 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.6% vs CCRN's -5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 5.6% vs -0.9% |
PACS vs CCRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PACS vs CCRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PACS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 7.0x CCRN's $761M. PACS is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCRN's -13.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $761M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $365M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $192M | -$99M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $254M | $41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | -6.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CCRN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PACS's 22.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCRN's 23.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $423M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $317M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.56x | -4.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.24x | 133.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.63x | 23.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 0.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.53x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PACS delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-27 for CCRN. CCRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACS's 3.36x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.1% | -27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.36x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | -$106M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PACS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PACS five years ago would be worth $14,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,746 for CCRN. Over the past 12 months, PACS leads with a +219.6% total return vs CCRN's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PACS at 13.5% vs CCRN's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | +62.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +219.6% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.2% | -44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.2% | -22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.2% | -10.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | -17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PACS and CCRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PACS is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCRN's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCRN currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs PACS's 78.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.08 | $14.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.50 | $7.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 772K | 552K |
Analyst Outlook
CCRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PACS as "Buy" and CCRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for PACS (target: $45) vs -18.9% for CCRN (target: $11).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.67 | $10.61 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
PACS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCRN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PACS vs CCRN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PACS or CCRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is the stronger pick with 29. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PACS or CCRN?
On forward P/E, PACS Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PACS or CCRN?
Over the past 5 years, PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) delivered a total return of +46. 2%, compared to -22. 5% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PACS returned +46. 2% versus CCRN's -10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PACS or CCRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. 's 0. 78β — meaning CCRN is approximately 22% more volatile than PACS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for PACS Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PACS or CCRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is pulling ahead at 29. 3% versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PACS Group, Inc. grew EPS 221. 1% year-over-year, compared to -565. 9% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PACS or CCRN?
PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -9. 0% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PACS leads at 5. 9% versus -0. 3% for CCRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PACS leads at 21. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PACS or CCRN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 133. 8x for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — 117. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PACS: 32. 9% to $44. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — PACS or CCRN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PACS or CCRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PACS: +46. 2%, CCRN: -10. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PACS and CCRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (PACS (Financial Services) and CCRN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PACS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.