Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PAGP vs MPLX vs EPD vs PAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
PAGP vs MPLX vs EPD vs PAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $4.68B | $57.12B | $81.56B | $15.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44.26B | $12.54B | $52.60B | $44.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $539M | $4.71B | $5.80B | $1.44B |
| Gross Margin | 5.3% | 60.0% | 13.6% | 3.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 44.9% | 13.5% | 3.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 12.7x | 13.1x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $7.93B | $26.16B | $34.93B | $7.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $349M | $2.14B | $1.25B | $348M |
PAGP vs MPLX vs EPD vs PAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plains GP Holdings,… (PAGP) | 100 | 236.5 | +136.5% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 197.5 | +97.5% |
| Plains All American… (PAA) | 100 | 227.7 | +127.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAGP vs MPLX vs EPD vs PAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 13.8x)
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 184.4% 10Y total return vs PAA's 54.1%
- 8.4% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4%
- 37.5% margin vs PAGP's 1.2%
EPD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06, yield 5.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06 vs MPLX's 0.18, lower leverage
PAA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +41.8% vs MPLX's +22.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs PAGP's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs MPLX's 0.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs MPLX's +22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs PAGP's 1.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs 4.0% |
PAGP vs MPLX vs EPD vs PAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PAGP vs MPLX vs EPD vs PAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
PAGP leads 2 • EPD leads 0 • PAA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPD is the larger business by revenue, generating $52.6B annually — 4.2x MPLX's $12.5B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAGP's 1.2%. On growth, MPLX holds the edge at +5.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44.3B | $12.5B | $52.6B | $44.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.4B | $7.0B | $9.7B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $539M | $4.7B | $5.8B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.4B | $5.0B | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +60.0% | +13.6% | +3.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +44.9% | +13.5% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +37.5% | +11.0% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +39.8% | +5.6% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.1% | +5.2% | -2.9% | -19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | -17.3% | +2.7% | +14.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PAGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 74% valuation discount to PAGP's 45.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAGP's 5.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPLX's 13.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $57.1B | $81.6B | $15.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.3B | $81.1B | $115.2B | $23.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 45.44x | 11.67x | 14.18x | 30.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.50x | 12.71x | 13.14x | 13.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.58x | 13.27x | 12.10x | 10.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 4.83x | 1.55x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 3.95x | 2.70x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.54x | 13.93x | 27.51x | 8.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $2 for PAGP. PAGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPLX's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPLX scores 6/9 vs PAA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +32.8% | +19.3% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +11.3% | +7.5% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +9.9% | +8.3% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +12.9% | +10.9% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 1.80x | 1.14x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.6B | $24.0B | $33.7B | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $349M | $2.1B | $1.2B | $348M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $26.2B | $34.9B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.30x | 5.85x | 5.21x | 7.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAGP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAGP five years ago would be worth $30,402 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,572 for EPD. Over the past 12 months, PAA leads with a +41.8% total return vs MPLX's +22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAGP at 28.0% vs EPD's 20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.1% | +6.4% | +20.7% | +25.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.1% | +22.5% | +31.7% | +41.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.6% | +95.7% | +73.8% | +107.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.0% | +157.2% | +105.7% | +195.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.9% | +184.4% | +119.8% | +54.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.0% | +25.1% | +20.2% | +27.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPD and PAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPLX's 0.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 0.18x | 0.06x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.75 | $59.98 | $39.73 | $23.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.68 | $47.80 | $29.90 | $15.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +93.8% | +95.0% | +95.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 46.5 | 47.0 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.8M | 4.1M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MPLX and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAGP as "Buy", MPLX as "Buy", EPD as "Buy", PAA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.1% upside for MPLX (target: $60) vs -3.7% for PAGP (target: $23). For income investors, MPLX offers the higher dividend yield at 7.01% vs PAGP's 5.39%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.75 | $60.25 | $37.00 | $22.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 28 | 45 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +7.0% | +5.7% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $3.94 | $2.14 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
MPLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAGP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
PAGP vs MPLX vs EPD vs PAA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the stronger pick with 8.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plains GP Holdings, L. P. (PAGP) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Plains GP Holdings, L. P. at 45. 4x. On forward P/E, Plains GP Holdings, L. P. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA?
Over the past 5 years, Plains GP Holdings, L.
P. (PAGP) delivered a total return of +204. 0%, compared to +105. 7% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPLX returned +184. 4% versus PAGP's +51. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus MPLX Lp's 0. 18β — meaning MPLX is approximately 188% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Plains GP Holdings, L. P. (PAGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 180% for MPLX Lp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MPLX Lp (MPLX) is pulling ahead at 8.
4% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MPLX Lp grew EPS 14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -49. 0% for Plains GP Holdings, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAGP leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus 0. 2% for Plains GP Holdings, L. P. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPLX leads at 40. 3% versus 2. 3% for PAGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPLX leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Plains GP Holdings, L.
P. (PAGP) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPLX: 7. 1% to $60. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 5. 4% for Plains GP Holdings, L. P. (PAGP).
09Is PAGP or MPLX or EPD or PAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 5. 7% yield, +119. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPD: +119. 8%, PAA: +54. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAGP and MPLX and EPD and PAA?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAGP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PAA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.