Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PANL logo
PANL
CAT logo
CAT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PANL vs CAT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$502M
5Y Perf.+206.0%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$423.68B
5Y Perf.+619.8%

PANL vs CAT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PANL logoPANL
CAT logoCAT
IndustryMarine ShippingAgricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$502M$423.68B
Revenue (TTM)$680M$70.75B
Net Income (TTM)$35M$9.42B
Gross Margin11.7%32.5%
Operating Margin6.7%16.6%
Forward P/E6.3x36.9x
Total Debt$372M$43.33B
Cash & Equiv.$103M$9.98B

PANL vs CATLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PANL
CAT
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Pangaea Logistics S… (PANL)100306.0+206.0%
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)100719.8+619.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PANL vs CAT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PANL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Caterpillar Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇PANL emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
The Income Pick

PANL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 3.3%
  • Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 78.4%, current ratio 1.69x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CAT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 11.7% 10Y total return vs PANL's 250.6%
  • PEG 1.31 vs PANL's 2.16
  • 13.3% margin vs PANL's 5.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPANL logoPANL17.8% revenue growth vs CAT's 4.3%
ValuePANL logoPANLLower P/E (6.3x vs 36.9x)
Quality / MarginsCAT logoCAT13.3% margin vs PANL's 5.1%
Stability / SafetyPANL logoPANLBeta 1.30 vs CAT's 1.67, lower leverage
DividendsPANL logoPANL3.3% yield, vs CAT's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)CAT logoCAT+153.9% vs PANL's +65.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CAT logoCAT10.0% ROA vs PANL's 3.7%, ROIC 15.9% vs 3.7%

PANL vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
FY 2025
Voyage
93.6%$578M
Charter
6.4%$39M
CATCaterpillar Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Subsegments
66.6%$74.0B
Construction Industries
22.6%$25.1B
Resource Industries
11.2%$12.5B
Financial Products
3.8%$4.2B
Other Segments
0.3%$327M
Power & Energy
-4.6%$-5,058,000,000

PANL vs CAT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCATLAGGINGPANL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 104.1x PANL's $680M. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PANL's 5.1%. On growth, PANL holds the edge at +38.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPANL logoPANLPangaea Logistics…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$680M$70.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$90M$14.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$35M$9.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$56M$11.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.7%+32.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.7%+16.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.1%+13.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.2%+16.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+38.9%+22.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.8%+30.2%
CAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PANL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 25.6x trailing earnings, PANL trades at a 47% valuation discount to CAT's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.72x vs PANL's 8.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPANL logoPANLPangaea Logistics…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Market CapShares × price$502M$423.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$772M$457.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS25.60x48.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.26x36.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate8.82x1.72x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.59x33.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.79x6.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.05x20.03x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.63x41.24x
PANL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $7 for PANL. PANL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x.

MetricPANL logoPANLPangaea Logistics…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.3%+47.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.7%+10.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.7%+15.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.7%+19.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x2.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$269M$33.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$103M$10.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$372M$43.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.14x9.22x
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $42,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,101 for PANL. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +153.9% total return vs PANL's +65.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 57.4% vs PANL's 11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPANL logoPANLPangaea Logistics…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.5%+52.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.5%+153.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+38.5%+289.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+111.0%+327.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+250.6%+1168.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+11.5%+57.4%
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PANL and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PANL is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs PANL's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPANL logoPANLPangaea Logistics…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.30x1.67x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.39$946.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.46$355.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.8%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.352.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded553K2.4M
Evenly matched — PANL and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PANL and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates PANL as "Buy" and CAT as "Buy". For income investors, PANL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.28% vs CAT's 0.64%.

MetricPANL logoPANLPangaea Logistics…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$882.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts1253
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises032
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.25$5.86
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+1.2%
Evenly matched — PANL and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PANL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCaterpillar Inc. (CAT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PANL vs CAT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PANL or CAT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.

(PANL) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PANL or CAT?

On trailing P/E, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.

(PANL) is the cheapest at 25. 6x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 31x versus Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. 's 2. 16x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PANL or CAT?

Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) delivered a total return of +327. 7%, compared to +111. 0% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1169% versus PANL's +250. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PANL or CAT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.

(PANL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning CAT is approximately 28% more volatile than PANL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PANL or CAT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.

(PANL) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Caterpillar Inc. grew EPS -14. 6% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PANL or CAT?

Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 3. 1% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAT leads at 16. 6% versus 6. 0% for PANL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAT leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PANL or CAT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 31x versus Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 36. 9x for Caterpillar Inc. — 30. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PANL or CAT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).

09

Is PANL or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +1169% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAT: +1169%, PANL: +250. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PANL and CAT?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PANL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.