Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PASG vs ACAD vs PRAX vs KRYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PASG vs ACAD vs PRAX vs KRYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $18M | $3.70B | $8.15B | $10.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.10B | $0.00 | $417M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $376M | $-327M | $225M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% | — | 92.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.4% | — | 42.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 55.6x | — | 44.9x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $52M | $110K | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $178M | $357M | $496M |
PASG vs ACAD vs PRAX vs KRYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 46.5 | -53.5% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 809.6 | +709.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PASG vs ACAD vs PRAX vs KRYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PASG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 39.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ACAD is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 26.2% ROA vs PASG's -59.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -141.9%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.6% vs PASG's -28.4%
KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.89
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 128.0%
- 31.7% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -32.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs PASG's 3.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs PASG's -28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PASG's -59.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -141.9% |
PASG vs ACAD vs PRAX vs KRYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PASG vs ACAD vs PRAX vs KRYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • PASG leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACAD's 34.3%. On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $0 | $417M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | $96M | -$357M | $185M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $376M | -$327M | $225M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $212M | -$283M | $237M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.5% | — | +92.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% | — | +42.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +34.3% | — | +53.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +19.4% | — | +56.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% | — | +31.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | -81.8% | +2.7% | +52.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 81% valuation discount to KRYS's 50.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 25.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRYS's 58.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $3.7B | $8.2B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $3.6B | $7.8B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | 9.44x | -20.94x | 50.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 55.56x | — | 44.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.75x | — | 58.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.45x | — | 26.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 3.02x | 7.24x | 8.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.20x | — | 54.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACAD and KRYS each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-151 for PASG. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PASG's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs PASG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -150.9% | +35.6% | -43.0% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.8% | +26.2% | -40.2% | +17.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -141.9% | +10.0% | -65.0% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.6% | +10.1% | -49.3% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.04x | 0.00x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$126M | -$357M | -$487M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $178M | $357M | $496M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $52M | $110,000 | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PRAX and KRYS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $53,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $195 for PASG. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +557.0% total return vs PASG's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 157.7% vs PASG's -32.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.2% | -17.3% | -1.4% | +41.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | -5.8% | +557.0% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.8% | -9.3% | +1611.0% | +179.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -16.9% | -12.5% | +433.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -42.2% | -32.3% | +3171.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.9% | -3.2% | +157.7% | +40.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KRYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PASG's 3.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs PASG's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.30x | 1.08x | 1.49x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $27.81 | $366.52 | $356.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.94 | $19.69 | $37.19 | $127.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +77.7% | +77.0% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 51.4 | 42.5 | 71.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 1.4M | 407K | 276K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACAD as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 106.9% upside for PRAX (target: $584) vs -3.3% for KRYS (target: $336).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.67 | $584.00 | $336.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 16 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ACAD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PASG vs ACAD vs PRAX vs KRYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 50. 9x. On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 44. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +433. 0%, compared to -98. 1% for Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +31. 7% versus PASG's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Passage Bio, Inc. 's 3. 30β — meaning PASG is approximately 269% more volatile than KRYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 128% for Passage Bio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) trades at 44. 9x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 106. 9% to $584. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PASG or ACAD or PRAX or KRYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89)). Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) carries a higher beta of 3. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRYS: +31. 7%, PASG: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PASG and ACAD and PRAX and KRYS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PASG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.