Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $18M | $24.60B | $435M | $1.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.39B | $160M | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $853M | $-129M | $-395M |
| Gross Margin | — | 67.1% | 37.1% | -31.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.9% | -101.7% | -6.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $24M | $2.55B | $759M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $1.42B | $64M | $155M |
PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| Pacific Biosciences… (PACB) | 100 | 40.6 | -59.4% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PASG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 39.6% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.02
- 18.9% 10Y total return vs NTLA's -43.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 93.8%, current ratio 2.08x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 2.08x
PACB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NTLA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 27.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.6% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs NTLA's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs PASG's 3.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.4% vs PASG's -28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs PASG's -59.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -141.9% |
PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 4 of 6 categories
PASG leads 0 • PACB leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN and PASG operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.0%. On growth, ILMN holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.4B | $160M | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | $1.1B | -$151M | -$411M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $853M | -$129M | -$395M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $989M | -$116M | -$364M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +67.1% | +37.1% | -31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +20.9% | -101.7% | -6.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +19.4% | -80.3% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +22.5% | -72.6% | -5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% | +0.1% | -9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | +6.1% | +97.9% | +26.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PASG and PACB and NTLA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $24.6B | $435M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $25.7B | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | 29.71x | -0.77x | -4.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.01x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.02x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.69x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.67x | 2.72x | 25.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 9.28x | 78.51x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.42x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-5 for PACB. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs PASG's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -150.9% | +32.8% | -4.9% | -57.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.8% | +13.4% | -16.1% | -46.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -141.9% | +16.8% | -45.8% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.6% | +17.6% | -58.0% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.94x | 141.98x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $1.1B | $696M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $1.4B | $64M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $2.6B | $759M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 12.09x | -44.67x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,653 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $195 for PASG. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +79.4% total return vs PASG's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILMN at -6.2% vs PACB's -52.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.2% | +20.5% | -23.9% | +70.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | +79.4% | +6.9% | +63.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.8% | -17.6% | -89.3% | -64.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -63.5% | -95.2% | -79.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +18.9% | -84.3% | -43.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.9% | -6.2% | -52.6% | -28.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PASG's 3.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs PASG's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.30x | 1.02x | 2.61x | 2.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $177.22 | $2.73 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.94 | $88.00 | $1.09 | $7.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +91.4% | +51.3% | +55.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 54.2 | 45.2 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 1.7M | 6.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ILMN as "Buy", PACB as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.8% upside for NTLA (target: $26) vs -28.6% for PACB (target: $1).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $151.40 | $1.00 | $26.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 50 | 18 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ILMN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is the stronger pick with 16. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 29. 7x trailing P/E (31. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) delivered a total return of -63. 5%, compared to -98. 1% for Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ILMN returned +18. 9% versus PASG's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Passage Bio, Inc. 's 3. 30β — meaning PASG is approximately 225% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is pulling ahead at 16. 9% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -70. 1% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTLA leads at 9. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTLA: 66.
8% to $26. 13.
07Which pays a better dividend — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02)). Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) carries a higher beta of 3. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +18. 9%, PASG: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PASG and ILMN and PACB and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PASG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.