Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PAVM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
PAVM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $466M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $1.92B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29K | $0.00 | $1.56B | $674M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6.32B | $-168M | $153M | $-173M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | -1729.1% | — | 65.4% | 75.2% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -167563.7% | — | 12.3% | -27.2% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | — | 24.8x | — | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $22M | $70M | $290M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $194M | $1.12B | $103M | $551M |
PAVM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAVmed Inc. (PAVM) | 100 | 24.0 | -76.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 163.9 | +63.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAVM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAVM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.86
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth 105.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 81.6%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- +8.7% vs NVCR's +1.1%
DBVT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ALKS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 94.9% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs PAVM's -218K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.7% vs NVCR's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs PAVM's -166.0%, ROIC 14.2% vs -232.4% |
PAVM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PAVM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 1 • PAVM leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAVM's -217914.6%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29,000 | $0 | $1.6B | $674M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4.8B | -$112M | $212M | -$165M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6.3B | -$168M | $153M | -$173M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$151M | $392M | -$48M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1729.1% | — | +65.4% | +75.2% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -167563.7% | — | +12.3% | -27.2% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -217914.6% | — | +9.8% | -25.7% | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -123.5% | — | +25.1% | -7.1% | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.5% | — | +28.2% | +12.3% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.1% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -100.0% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NVCR and INVA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 72% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INVA's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $466M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $497M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.39x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -13.80x | 6.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 7.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | — | 8.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 155.65x | — | 4.00x | 2.92x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x | 3.28x | 5.51x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | — | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-245 for PAVM. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -245.1% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -50.8% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -166.0% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -16.5% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | — | +18.9% | -16.4% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -145.7% | +14.2% | -28.9% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.85x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $187M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $194M | $1.1B | $103M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $22M | $70M | $290M | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -748.04x | -189.82x | 32.30x | -96.80x | 63.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, PAVM leads with a +871.3% total return vs NVCR's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.0% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | +4.9% | +25.3% | +28.3% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +871.3% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +1.1% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -75.7% | +95.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -91.3% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | -87.0% | -11.0% | +30.3% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -37.6% | +25.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and INVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PAVM's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.26x | 1.00x | 2.15x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.44 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $20.06 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $9.82 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +83.9% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.9 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 69.8 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 252K | 2.3M | 1.5M | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
PAVM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAVM as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 29.9% for ALKS (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $46.00 | $33.50 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 28 | 15 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
INVA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ALKS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
PAVM vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PAVmed Inc.
(PAVM) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PAVmed Inc. (PAVM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVA returned +95. 6% versus PAVM's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 1787% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PAVmed Inc.
(PAVM) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAVM leads at 81. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA?
PAVmed Inc.
(PAVM) is the more profitable company, earning 1329% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 1329% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -1485. 4% for PAVM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PAVM or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +95. 6%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAVM and DBVT and ALKS and NVCR and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAVM is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.