PAVS
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$70K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PAVS vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMT
Walmart Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+214.9%
PAVS vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PAVS | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $70K | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 11.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261K | $10.73B |
PAVS vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PAVS
WMT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paranovus Entertain… (PAVS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAVS vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WMT leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PAVS
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
PAVS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 1.12x
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 44.7x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Income Pick
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs PAVS's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WMT | 4.7% revenue growth vs PAVS's -98.9% |
| Value | PAVS | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 44.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | WMT | 3.3% margin vs PAVS's -211.2% |
| Stability / Safety | WMT | Beta 0.12 vs PAVS's 1.51 |
| Dividends | WMT | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +32.7% vs PAVS's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs PAVS's -94.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -27.1% |
PAVS vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
PAVS vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWMTLAGGINGPAVS
PAVSParanovus Entertainme…
1leads
WMTWalmart Inc.
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PAVSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WMT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PAVS4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WMT6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WMT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
WMT1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 55205.1x PAVS's $13M. WMT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAVS's -2.1%. On growth, PAVS holds the edge at +180.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $531,773 | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.5% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +180.3% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.9% | +35.1% |
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PAVS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70,061 | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.00x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x |
PAVS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-116 for PAVS. PAVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs PAVS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -116.2% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -94.4% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.5% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261,355 | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.83x | 11.85x |
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for PAVS. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs PAVS's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs PAVS's -93.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -94.8% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.2% | +37.6% |
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAVS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PAVS's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1488.00 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.02 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 17.2M |
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
WMT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
WMT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
WMT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAVS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallWalmart Inc. (WMT)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PAVS vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAVS or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 9% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 47. 7x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAVS or WMT?
On forward P/E, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAVS or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus PAVS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAVS or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. 's 1. 51β — meaning PAVS is approximately 1196% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAVS or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -98. 9% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. grew EPS 96. 4% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAVS or WMT?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -110. 3% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus -94. 8% for PAVS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAVS or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
(PAVS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 44. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAVS or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. PAVS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PAVS or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, PAVS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAVS and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT pays a dividend while PAVS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PAVS: 18033.4% · WMT: 5.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.