Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PAY vs IIIV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
PAY vs IIIV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.49B | $506M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $223M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 24.7% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 35.8x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $325M | $67M |
PAY vs IIIV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paymentus Holdings,… (PAY) | 100 | 91.3 | -8.7% |
| i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAY vs IIIV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 37.3%, EPS growth 48.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.0%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
- 11.3% ROA vs IIIV's 2.6%, ROIC 21.2% vs 0.6%
IIIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.92
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs PAY's -2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 1.95x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 35.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs PAY's 5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs PAY's 0.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -13.8% vs PAY's -21.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs IIIV's 2.6%, ROIC 21.2% vs 0.6% |
PAY vs IIIV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PAY vs IIIV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 5.8x IIIV's $223M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.3% (IIIV) to 5.8% (PAY). On growth, PAY holds the edge at +30.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $223M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | -14.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.5% | -78.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IIIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.9x trailing earnings, IIIV trades at a 24% valuation discount to PAY's 53.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IIIV's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAY's 27.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $506M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $447M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.56x | 40.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.77x | 20.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.23x | 14.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.43x | 1.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.56x | 134.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAY delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for IIIV. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAY's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAY scores 6/9 vs IIIV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.3% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.2% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.2% | +0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$313M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $325M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAY five years ago would be worth $9,734 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,236 for IIIV. Over the past 12 months, IIIV leads with a -13.8% total return vs PAY's -21.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAY at 51.3% vs IIIV's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.2% | -9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.1% | -13.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +246.4% | -2.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.7% | -27.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.7% | +24.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.3% | -0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAY and IIIV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IIIV is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAY's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.43 | $33.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.02 | $19.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 506K | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PAY as "Hold" and IIIV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for IIIV (target: $29) vs 19.7% for PAY (target: $33).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.33 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.4% |
PAY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IIIV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PAY vs IIIV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAY or IIIV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) is the stronger pick with 37. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) offers the better valuation at 40. 9x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAY or IIIV?
On trailing P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the cheapest at 40. 9x versus Paymentus Holdings, Inc. at 53. 6x. On forward P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAY or IIIV?
Over the past 5 years, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) delivered a total return of -2. 7%, compared to -27. 6% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIIV returned +24. 9% versus PAY's -2. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAY or IIIV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Paymentus Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning PAY is approximately 3% more volatile than IIIV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Paymentus Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAY or IIIV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) is pulling ahead at 37. 3% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Paymentus Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 48. 6% year-over-year, compared to -87. 9% for i3 Verticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAY leads at 34. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAY or IIIV?
i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 5. 6% for Paymentus Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAY leads at 6. 3% versus 1. 9% for IIIV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIIV leads at 55. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAY or IIIV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 35. 8x for Paymentus Holdings, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IIIV: 26. 6% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAY or IIIV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PAY or IIIV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIIV: +24. 9%, PAY: -2. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAY and IIIV?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.