Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PBHC vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
PBHC vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $85M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | -5.2% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $107M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $185M |
PBHC vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathfinder Bancorp,… (PBHC) | 100 | 133.2 | +33.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBHC vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 26.41x
- Beta 0.20, yield 2.8%, current ratio 26.41x
- Better valuation composite
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs PBHC's 46.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs PBHC's -5.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs PBHC's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.0% vs PBHC's -3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
PBHC vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PBHC vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 11.0x PBHC's $79M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PBHC's -4.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PBHC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $181M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.70x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.20x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PBHC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PBHC's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs PBHC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.3% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $96M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $107M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.13x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBTB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,963 for PBHC. Over the past 12 months, NBTB leads with a +9.0% total return vs PBHC's -3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 15.5% vs PBHC's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.3% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.1% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.6% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.9% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.1% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBHC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs PBHC's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.06 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs PBHC's 2.79%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PBHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PBHC vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBHC or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PBHC or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to +9. 6% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus PBHC's +46. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PBHC or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
(PBHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 348% more volatile than PBHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 89% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PBHC or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -5. 2% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -228. 6% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PBHC or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -4. 3% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -5. 2% for PBHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PBHC or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 8% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC).
07Is PBHC or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
(PBHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PBHC: +46. 9%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PBHC and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PBHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.