Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PDCC vs ECC vs JPM vs OXLC vs EIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
Asset Management
Asset Management - Income
PDCC vs ECC vs JPM vs OXLC vs EIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Asset Management | Asset Management - Income |
| Market Cap | $65M | $505M | $892.31B | $906M | $239M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $168M | $280.33B | $819M | $54M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-124M | $57.05B | $-537M | $-1M |
| Gross Margin | 78.9% | 81.6% | 60.0% | 70.9% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | -71.8% | -50.2% | 25.9% | -54.1% | 50.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.1x | 14.3x | 2.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $276M | $942.38B | $773M | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100K | $47M | $343.34B | $97M | $6M |
PDCC vs ECC vs JPM vs OXLC vs EIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearl Diver Credit … (PDCC) | 100 | 46.5 | -53.5% |
| Eagle Point Credit … (ECC) | 100 | 38.4 | -61.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 150.1 | +50.1% |
| Oxford Lane Capital… (OXLC) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
| Eagle Point Income … (EIC) | 100 | 63.8 | -36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDCC vs ECC vs JPM vs OXLC vs EIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDCC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.27 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
ECC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 475.6% 10Y total return vs ECC's 49.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs OXLC's 2.0% (lower = leaner)
- 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs OXLC's 49.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +20.3% vs OXLC's -33.9%
OXLC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 49.8%
- Rev growth 309.1%, EPS growth -12.3%
- NIM 22.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 309.1% NII/revenue growth vs ECC's 0.1%
EIC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.53, yield 18.0%, current ratio 9.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 309.1% NII/revenue growth vs ECC's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs OXLC's 2.0% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs OXLC's 49.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs OXLC's -33.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs OXLC's 2.0% |
PDCC vs ECC vs JPM vs OXLC vs EIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PDCC vs ECC vs JPM vs OXLC vs EIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
OXLC leads 1 • PDCC leads 0 • ECC leads 0 • EIC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — JPM and EIC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 12585.8x PDCC's $22M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDCC's -86.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $168M | $280.3B | $819M | $54M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$122M | $81.4B | -$444M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$124M | $57.0B | -$537M | -$1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $71M | $100.9B | $1.6B | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.9% | +81.6% | +60.0% | +70.9% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -71.8% | -50.2% | +25.9% | -54.1% | +50.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | -74.1% | +20.4% | -65.5% | -2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +124.8% | +42.4% | +36.0% | +189.3% | -5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.0% | +16.0% | -31.8% | -178.5% |
Valuation Metrics
OXLC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EIC's 34.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $65M | $505M | $892.3B | $906M | $239M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $72M | $734M | $1.49T | $1.6B | $378M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.07x | -3.64x | 15.93x | -1.55x | -206.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.11x | 14.34x | 2.75x | 7.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.32x | — | 34.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 4.35x | 3.19x | 2.31x | 4.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 0.65x | 2.46x | 0.88x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.34x | — | 8.85x | 1.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-33 for OXLC. PDCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PDCC scores 5/9 vs EIC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.5% | -11.7% | +15.9% | -33.2% | -0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.1% | -8.4% | +1.3% | -22.5% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.5% | -5.9% | +4.5% | -18.7% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.4% | -6.2% | +8.9% | -22.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.37x | 2.60x | 0.75x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $229M | $599.0B | $676M | $139M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99,688 | $47M | $343.3B | $97M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $276M | $942.4B | $773M | $145M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.78x | -4.11x | 0.74x | -4.77x | 3.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $22,071 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,404 for PDCC. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.3% total return vs OXLC's -33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.7% vs PDCC's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | -25.1% | -0.9% | -27.7% | -4.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.6% | -30.1% | +20.3% | -33.9% | -12.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.0% | -10.6% | +133.8% | -3.6% | +23.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.0% | -1.7% | +120.7% | -10.9% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.0% | +49.4% | +475.6% | +32.8% | +13.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.5% | -3.7% | +32.7% | -1.2% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PDCC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PDCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs OXLC's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.77x | 0.94x | 0.66x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.40 | $7.83 | $337.25 | $21.50 | $14.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.25 | $3.46 | $266.85 | $8.01 | $9.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.0% | +48.8% | +94.7% | +43.2% | +72.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.6 | 30.9 | 65.0 | 26.9 | 37.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 968K | 7.0M | 959K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and OXLC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ECC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", OXLC as "Buy", EIC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.7% upside for EIC (target: $18) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, OXLC offers the higher dividend yield at 49.77% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.75 | $339.75 | — | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 61 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +37.9% | +1.9% | +49.8% | +18.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.45 | $5.95 | $4.62 | $1.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.9% | +2.3% | +41.7% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). OXLC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PDCC vs ECC vs JPM vs OXLC vs EIC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLC) is the stronger pick with 309. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC?
On forward P/E, Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
is actually cheaper at 2. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +120. 7%, compared to -26. 0% for Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. (PDCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus PDCC's -26. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
(PDCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 244% more volatile than PDCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. (PDCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLC) is pulling ahead at 309. 1% versus 0. 1% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1230. 2% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -149. 4% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -135. 4% for OXLC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EIC leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLC) trades at 2. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EIC: 71. 7% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC?
In this comparison, OXLC (49.
8% yield), ECC (37. 9% yield), EIC (18. 0% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PDCC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PDCC or ECC or JPM or OXLC or EIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 18. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EIC: +13. 6%, PDCC: -26. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDCC and ECC and JPM and OXLC and EIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PDCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ECC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; OXLC is a small-cap high-growth stock; EIC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ECC, JPM, OXLC, EIC pay a dividend while PDCC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.