Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PDEX vs NSYS vs LIQT vs OSIS vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
PDEX vs NSYS vs LIQT vs OSIS vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $184M | $35M | $22M | $3.97B | $4.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $117M | $17M | $1.81B | $446M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $-3M | $-9M | $152M | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 13.5% | 4.9% | 32.8% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | -1.0% | -50.0% | 12.1% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | — | — | 23.0x | 55.5x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $18M | $12M | $682M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $419K | $916K | — | $106M | $59M |
PDEX vs NSYS vs LIQT vs OSIS vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Dex, Inc. (PDEX) | 100 | 291.5 | +191.5% |
| Nortech Systems Inc… (NSYS) | 100 | 372.6 | +272.6% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) | 100 | 318.2 | +218.2% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDEX vs NSYS vs LIQT vs OSIS vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.33
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 345.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 45.3%, current ratio 3.23x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 3.23x
Among these 5 stocks, NSYS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +64.8% vs OSIS's +8.9%
OSIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 372.9% 10Y total return vs PDEX's 14.2%
- PEG 1.39 vs PDEX's 1.97
- Better valuation composite
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs NSYS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs POWI's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.8% vs OSIS's +8.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.3% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 17.0% vs -31.1% |
PDEX vs NSYS vs LIQT vs OSIS vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PDEX vs NSYS vs LIQT vs OSIS vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PDEX leads in 3 of 6 categories
NSYS leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • LIQT leads 0 • OSIS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PDEX and POWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 107.6x LIQT's $17M. PDEX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $117M | $17M | $1.8B | $446M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $166,000 | -$6M | $229M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | -$3M | -$9M | $152M | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$3M | -$7M | $77M | $85M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +13.5% | +4.9% | +32.8% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | -1.0% | -50.0% | +12.1% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | -2.3% | -53.3% | +8.4% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -2.5% | -39.3% | +4.2% | +18.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.6% | -2.9% | +53.6% | +2.0% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | +81.5% | +69.4% | -3.8% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NSYS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PDEX trades at a 88% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OSIS offers better value at 1.67x vs PDEX's 1.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $184M | $35M | $22M | $4.0B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $52M | $34M | $4.6B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.51x | -26.64x | -2.59x | 27.68x | 184.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.13x | — | — | 23.05x | 55.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.76x | — | — | 1.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.79x | 33.70x | — | 17.43x | 79.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 0.27x | 1.35x | 2.32x | 9.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.27x | 1.02x | 2.14x | 4.35x | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 70.85x | 45.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PDEX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PDEX delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. PDEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIQT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PDEX scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.1% | -7.9% | -70.0% | +16.7% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.3% | -3.5% | -29.5% | +6.3% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.0% | -0.3% | -31.1% | +11.5% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.8% | -0.4% | — | +16.3% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.53x | 1.17x | 0.72x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | $17M | $12M | $576M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $419,000 | $916,000 | — | $106M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $18M | $12M | $682M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.18x | -1.23x | -13.46x | 11.43x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PDEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSIS five years ago would be worth $24,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs OSIS's +8.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PDEX at 54.0% vs LIQT's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.2% | +68.5% | +54.9% | -5.7% | +93.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.4% | +29.7% | +64.8% | +8.9% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +265.5% | +25.5% | -31.3% | +103.9% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.1% | +103.2% | -96.1% | +149.9% | -8.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1423.1% | +233.9% | -90.9% | +372.9% | +232.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.0% | +7.9% | -11.8% | +26.8% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
PDEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PDEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDEX currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs LIQT's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.50x | 0.52x | 1.44x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.22 | $15.39 | $3.35 | $311.27 | $78.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.47 | $6.50 | $1.30 | $204.00 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +81.4% | +68.9% | +77.5% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 49.2 | 57.0 | 30.1 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 20K | 50K | 285K | 967K |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PDEX as "Buy", OSIS as "Buy", POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for OSIS (target: $294) vs 10.0% for POWI (target: $79). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $293.50 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | — | 17 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +2.5% |
PDEX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NSYS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PDEX vs NSYS vs LIQT vs OSIS vs POWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pro-Dex, Inc.
(PDEX) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS). Pro-Dex, Inc. (PDEX) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (24. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pro-Dex, Inc. (PDEX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI?
On trailing P/E, Pro-Dex, Inc.
(PDEX) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, OSI Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: OSI Systems, Inc. wins at 1. 39x versus Pro-Dex, Inc. 's 1. 97x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, OSI Systems, Inc.
(OSIS) delivered a total return of +149. 9%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDEX returned +1423% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pro-Dex, Inc.
(PDEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning POWI is approximately 541% more volatile than PDEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pro-Dex, Inc. (PDEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 117% for LiqTech International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pro-Dex, Inc.
(PDEX) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -8. 0% for Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pro-Dex, Inc. grew EPS 345. 0% year-over-year, compared to -119. 7% for Nortech Systems Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, PDEX leads at 16. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI?
Pro-Dex, Inc.
(PDEX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDEX leads at 16. 1% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 39x versus Pro-Dex, Inc. 's 1. 97x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 55. 5x for Power Integrations, Inc. — 32. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OSIS: 21. 7% to $293. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PDEX, NSYS, LIQT, OSIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PDEX or NSYS or LIQT or OSIS or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pro-Dex, Inc.
(PDEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +1423% 10Y return). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PDEX: +1423%, POWI: +232. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDEX and NSYS and LIQT and OSIS and POWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (PDEX (Healthcare) and NSYS (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and OSIS (Technology) and POWI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PDEX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OSIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while PDEX, NSYS, LIQT, OSIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.