Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PDYN vs ISRG vs NVDA vs SYK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Semiconductors
Medical - Devices
PDYN vs ISRG vs NVDA vs SYK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Semiconductors | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $239M | $161.07B | $5.14T | $112.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $10.58B | $215.94B | $25.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $2.98B | $120.07B | $3.25B |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 66.3% | 71.1% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 30.5% | 60.4% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 25.6x | 43.8x | 25.6x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $303M | $11.41B | $14.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $3.37B | $10.61B | $4.01B |
PDYN vs ISRG vs NVDA vs SYK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1020.7 | +920.7% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDYN vs ISRG vs NVDA vs SYK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDYN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ISRG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs ISRG's 5.5%
- PEG 0.27 vs ISRG's 2.01
- 65.5% revenue growth vs PDYN's -32.6%
SYK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.55, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.89x
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 43.8x), PEG 1.32 vs 2.01
- Beta 0.55 vs PDYN's 3.07
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs PDYN's -32.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 43.8x), PEG 1.32 vs 2.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs PDYN's -358.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs PDYN's 3.07 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.7% vs SYK's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs PDYN's -29.8%, ROIC 81.8% vs -129.4% |
PDYN vs ISRG vs NVDA vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PDYN vs ISRG vs NVDA vs SYK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
SYK leads 2 • PDYN leads 0 • ISRG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 30525.6x PDYN's $7M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDYN's -3.6%. On growth, PDYN holds the edge at +106.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $10.6B | $215.9B | $25.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $3.8B | $133.2B | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $3.0B | $120.1B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $2.8B | $96.7B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +66.3% | +71.1% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +30.5% | +60.4% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +28.2% | +55.6% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +26.8% | +44.8% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.9% | +23.0% | +73.2% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -150.9% | +18.8% | +97.8% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.6x trailing earnings, PDYN trades at a 56% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs ISRG's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $239M | $161.1B | $5.14T | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $232M | $158.0B | $5.14T | $123.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.63x | 57.62x | 43.16x | 35.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.84x | 25.55x | 19.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.65x | 0.45x | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 43.62x | 38.59x | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 45.56x | 16.00x | 23.80x | 4.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | 9.17x | 32.85x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.67x | 53.17x | 26.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-40 for PDYN. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYK's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs PDYN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.5% | +16.9% | +76.3% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.8% | +14.8% | +58.1% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -129.4% | +15.0% | +81.8% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -45.7% | +16.5% | +97.2% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.02x | 0.07x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$3.1B | $807M | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $3.4B | $10.6B | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $303M | $11.4B | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 545.03x | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,126 for PDYN. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs SYK's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs SYK's 1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | -19.3% | +12.0% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | -15.4% | +80.7% | -22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.7% | +49.6% | +625.9% | +5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +58.7% | +1328.9% | +21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +554.2% | +23902.3% | +187.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.8% | +14.4% | +93.6% | +1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVDA and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PDYN's 3.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs PDYN's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.07x | 1.02x | 1.73x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.00 | $603.88 | $216.80 | $404.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.14 | $427.84 | $112.28 | $289.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.3% | +75.1% | +97.6% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 42.4 | 60.7 | 24.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 1.8M | 164.5M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SYK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PDYN as "Hold", ISRG as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.5% upside for PDYN (target: $10) vs 31.8% for NVDA (target: $279). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $622.60 | $278.83 | $403.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 55 | 79 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.04 | $3.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SYK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PDYN vs ISRG vs NVDA vs SYK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 6% for Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN). Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK?
On trailing P/E, Palladyne AI Corp.
(PDYN) is the cheapest at 25. 6x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Stryker Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -88.
7% for Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus PDYN's -88. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Palladyne AI Corp. 's 3. 07β — meaning PDYN is approximately 461% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 66% for Stryker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -32. 6% for Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palladyne AI Corp. grew EPS 108. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Stryker Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK?
Palladyne AI Corp.
(PDYN) is the more profitable company, earning 191. 4% net margin versus 12. 9% for Stryker Corporation — meaning it keeps 191. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -617. 7% for PDYN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Stryker Corporation (SYK) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 43. 8x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 24. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PDYN: 54. 5% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. PDYN, ISRG, NVDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PDYN or ISRG or NVDA or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN) carries a higher beta of 3. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, PDYN: -88. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDYN and ISRG and NVDA and SYK?
These companies operate in different sectors (PDYN (Technology) and ISRG (Healthcare) and NVDA (Technology) and SYK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PDYN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK pays a dividend while PDYN, ISRG, NVDA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.