Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PDYN vs KTOS vs AIOT vs BBAI vs AEYE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Communication Equipment
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
PDYN vs KTOS vs AIOT vs BBAI vs AEYE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Aerospace & Defense | Communication Equipment | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $239M | $10.68B | $463M | $19.73B | $100M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $1.42B | $436M | $127M | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $29M | $-32M | $-289M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 18.3% | 55.2% | 25.8% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 1.8% | 1.7% | -68.3% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.6x | 73.5x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $11M | $180M | $287M | $24M | $721K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $561M | $49M | $87M | $5M |
PDYN vs KTOS vs AIOT vs BBAI vs AEYE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN) | 100 | 384.4 | +284.4% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 284.9 | +184.9% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 74.4 | -25.6% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 276.2 | +176.2% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 45.9 | -54.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDYN vs KTOS vs AIOT vs BBAI vs AEYE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDYN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
KTOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs AIOT's -28.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.06x
- Beta 1.84, current ratio 4.06x
- 2.1% margin vs PDYN's -358.0%
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.70, yield 22.2%
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs PDYN's -32.6%
- 22.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
BBAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AEYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs PDYN's -32.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs PDYN's -358.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.84 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 22.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs AIOT's -32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.0% ROA vs BBAI's -35.3%, ROIC 1.4% vs -19.5% |
PDYN vs KTOS vs AIOT vs BBAI vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PDYN vs KTOS vs AIOT vs BBAI vs AEYE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KTOS leads in 3 of 6 categories
AIOT leads 1 • BBAI leads 1 • PDYN leads 0 • AEYE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 200.1x PDYN's $7M. KTOS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDYN's -3.6%. On growth, PDYN holds the edge at +106.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $1.4B | $436M | $127M | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $72M | $69M | -$75M | -$504,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $29M | -$32M | -$289M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | -$133M | $3M | -$56M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +18.3% | +55.2% | +25.8% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +1.8% | +1.7% | -68.3% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +2.1% | -7.4% | -2.3% | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -9.4% | +0.6% | -44.3% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.9% | +22.6% | +47.4% | -0.9% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -150.9% | +133.3% | -25.5% | +52.0% | +29.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.6x trailing earnings, PDYN trades at a 94% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AIOT's 44.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KTOS's 118.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $239M | $10.7B | $463M | $19.7B | $100M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $232M | $10.3B | $701M | $19.7B | $96M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.63x | 438.46x | -7.91x | -5.09x | -32.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.49x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 118.42x | 44.16x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 45.56x | 7.93x | 1.28x | 154.51x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | 4.94x | 0.91x | 24.45x | 20.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KTOS scores 4/9 vs AIOT's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.5% | +1.3% | -6.6% | -50.7% | -47.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.8% | +1.0% | -3.4% | -35.3% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -129.4% | +1.4% | -4.3% | -19.5% | -42.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -45.7% | +1.5% | -5.1% | -19.6% | -17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.09x | 0.64x | 0.04x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$381M | $238M | -$63M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $561M | $49M | $87M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $180M | $287M | $24M | $721,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.16x | 0.47x | -18.17x | -2.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KTOS five years ago would be worth $21,025 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,126 for PDYN. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +58.1% total return vs AIOT's -32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs AIOT's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | -28.1% | -35.2% | -28.6% | -18.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | +58.1% | -32.7% | +36.7% | -27.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.7% | +331.5% | -28.7% | +49.5% | +20.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +110.3% | -28.7% | -56.9% | -60.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +1231.8% | -28.7% | -57.6% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.8% | +62.8% | -10.7% | +14.3% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KTOS and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KTOS is the less volatile stock with a 1.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIOT currently trades 56.0% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.07x | 1.84x | 2.70x | 3.31x | 2.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.00 | $134.00 | $6.07 | $9.39 | $16.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.14 | $32.85 | $2.77 | $2.96 | $5.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.3% | +42.5% | +56.0% | +44.4% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 38.8 | 52.2 | 63.3 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 4.3M | 1.6M | 34.6M | 194K |
Analyst Outlook
BBAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PDYN as "Hold", KTOS as "Buy", AIOT as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 135.3% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 43.9% for BBAI (target: $6). AIOT is the only dividend payer here at 22.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $110.58 | $8.00 | $6.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 22 | 5 | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +22.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.75 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KTOS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AIOT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PDYN vs KTOS vs AIOT vs BBAI vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 6% for Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN). Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE?
On trailing P/E, Palladyne AI Corp.
(PDYN) is the cheapest at 25. 6x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE?
Over the past 5 years, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -88. 7% for Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1232% versus PDYN's -88. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 84β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 80% more volatile than KTOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 64% for PowerFleet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus -32. 6% for Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palladyne AI Corp. grew EPS 108. 7% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE?
Palladyne AI Corp.
(PDYN) is the more profitable company, earning 191. 4% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 191. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KTOS leads at 2. 1% versus -617. 7% for PDYN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIOT: 135.
3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE?
In this comparison, AIOT (22.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PDYN, KTOS, BBAI, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PDYN or KTOS or AIOT or BBAI or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1232% 10Y return). Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN) carries a higher beta of 3. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KTOS: +1232%, PDYN: -88. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDYN and KTOS and AIOT and BBAI and AEYE?
These companies operate in different sectors (PDYN (Technology) and KTOS (Industrials) and AIOT (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PDYN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT pays a dividend while PDYN, KTOS, BBAI, AEYE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.